Istiḥsān (juristic preference): The forgotten principle of Islamic Law
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 402647
- Danışmanlar: DR. COLIN P. TURNER
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Din, Hukuk, Religion, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2006
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: University of Durham
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 342
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
The research work embodied in this thesis constitutes a critical analysis of classical and modern aspects of the concept of istiḥsān (juristic preference) in Islamic law, an important principle in Islamic legal legislation throughout history. This area of legislation has been investigated by many researchers and scholars; however, the research work conducted to evaluate the true nature and role of istiḥsān with regard a combination of classical and modern approaches still requires further investigation. The thesis consists of four chapters. The introductory chapter is the theoretical basis of the study and comprises a brief understanding of some general principles of Islamic law; the Qur'ān, the Sunnah, ijmā' (consensus), qiyās (analogy), maṣlaḥah mursalah (consideration of public interest), istiṣḥāb (presumption of continuity), qawl al- Ṣaḥābī (the saying of the Companion of the Prophet), 'urf (custom), sadd al-dharā'i' (blocking the means), shar' man qablanā (revealed laws preceding to the sharī'ah of Islam) and istiqrā' and so on. Chapter II deals with the development of ra'y and ijtihād in the context of istiḥsān. This chapter introduces the concept of ra'y and ijtihād as related to historical background and implementation, with their methods of development where istiḥsān originated from. Istiḥsān was practiced well before the formation of the Islamic legal schools of thought and can be referred back to the time of the Prophet, the Companions and the Successors. Chapter III begins with definitions of the term of istiḥsān, identifying its true nature with an extensive analysis both linguistically and technically. Historical development is investigated, and then the viewpoints of the scholars and their discourses ii that form the main cornerstone of this study. Also in this chapter the validity of istiḥsān is discussed and explained with special reference to the reason behind the disagreement over istiḥsān as the scholars introduce their evidences to justify the claims of those who consider it a valid source of law and those who do not recognize it as such. Consideration of istiḥsān and its implementation in the early Ḥanafī school of thought by eminent scholars is also elaborated. Chapter IV is devoted to the types of istiḥsān and the division among the scholars with practical examples. Other related terms as iḥtiyāj (need), ḍarar (harm), raf' al- ḥaraj (avoiding hardship), mashaqqah (hardship), ḍarūrah (necessity).
Benzer Tezler
- Hanefî mezhebinin genel karakteristiği, (Yüksek lisans tezi)
General characteristics of Hanafi sect, (Master thesis)
MUHAMMED TAMİR
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2019
DinHitit ÜniversitesiTemel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. FERHAT KOCA
- İmam Şâfiî'nin İbtâlü'l-İstihsan'ı ve ona karşı erken dönem Hanefî usulcülerinin verdiği cevaplar
Shafii's rejection of istihsan and responses of early hanafi jurists to him
AHMET ÖZTÜRK
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2015
DinDokuz Eylül ÜniversitesiTemel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
YRD. DOÇ. DR. İSMAİL ACAR
- İmam Serahsî'nin el-Mebsût isimli eserinde ibâdât ve ukûbât konularında istihsân delilinin uygulanması
The implemention of istiḥsān principle in the issues of al-ibadat and al-uqubat in İmam Serahsi's al- Mebsut
ESMA ŞAHİN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2019
DinBursa Uludağ ÜniversitesiTemel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ALİ KAYA
- موجبات العدول عن القول المعتمد في المذهب المالكي: فتاوى دار الإفتاء الليبية أُنموذجاً
Mâlikî mezhebinde mutemed görüşün terk edilme gerekçeleri: Dârü'l- İftâ el-Libiyye fetvâları örneği
OSAMAH ABDULAZİZ OMAR ALQADDARI
Yüksek Lisans
Arapça
2024
Dinİstanbul ÜniversitesiTemel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. NECMETTİN KIZILKAYA
- İbn Hazm'ın Hanefîlere yönelik kıyas eleştirisi
Ibn Hazm's criticism of analogy (qiyās) against Hanafīts
MUHAMMET ALİ ACAR
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2018
DinSakarya ÜniversitesiTemel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. HACI MEHMET GÜNAY