Geri Dön

Kant's response to hume in the second analogy

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 403455
  2. Yazar: SANİYE VATANSEVER
  3. Danışmanlar: Dr. DANIEL SUTHERLAND
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Felsefe, Philosophy
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2015
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: University of Illinois at Chicago
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 151

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

My dissertation aims to solve what I call Kant's“problem of empirical laws,”a problem concerning the coherence of Kant's claims that empirical laws as laws express a kind of necessity, and as empirical they are contingent. In the literature, this issue is usually framed in the context of Kant's relation to Hume and formulated as a question of whether Kant agrees with Hume that empirical laws are mere contingent generalizations. According to those who argue that Kant's main disagreement with Hume concerns the status of the Causal Principle, Kant agrees with Hume that empirical laws are contingent empirical generalizations. The defenders of this view, to which I refer as the“modest reading,”maintain that Kant's argument in the Second Analogy of Experience (henceforth, Second Analogy) aims to respond to Hume's“problem of causation,”a problem that questions the apriority and necessity of the Causal Principle alone. On the modest reading, Kant's Second Analogy argument proves neither the existence nor the necessity of empirical laws. Others who claim that Kant disagrees with Hume on the status of empirical laws, on the other hand, argue that Kant's Second Analogy argument proves not only the necessity of the Causal Principle but also the existence and the necessity of empirical laws. Proponents of this“strong reading”of the Second Analogy argue that by proving that there are necessary empirical laws, Kant aims solve Hume's“problem of induction,”a problem that questions the validity of our belief in the uniformity of nature. After I demonstrate the textual and philosophical problems with both of these readings, I present a novel account of what Kant establishes in the Second Analogy. While the modest and the strong readings agree that in the Second Analogy Kant responds to Hume, they disagree on the nature of the Humean problem Kant wants to solve. In order to understand the nature of these problems and identify the requirements for their solution, I first examine Hume's formulation of the problems of causation and induction. Then, I closely examine Kant's perception of these problems by closely analyzing the texts, where Kant refers to Hume and Hume's problem. Textual evidence reveals that Hume, on Kant's view, focused mainly on the validity of a single metaphysical concept and principle, namely the concept of causation and the Causal Principle. Hence, the Humean problem that Kant aims to solve in the Second Analogy requires a demonstration that the concept of causation and the Causal Principle are justified a priori. Having identified the Humean problem, I focus on Kant's Second Analogy argument where Kant proves the apriority of the Causal Principle. Contra the modest reading, I argue that in the Second Analogy Kant proves the validity of the Causal Principle by proving the existence of law-governed causal relations, which requires the demonstration that all causal relations are subsumed under some necessary empirical law. Thus, even if we cannot have insight into the necessity of individual empirical laws, Kant's Second Analogy argument shows that if empirical laws are true, they are necessarily true. In contrast with the strong reading, however, I argue that the existence of empirical laws does not guarantee the uniformity of nature. Hence, even though Kant's Second Analogy argument lays the ground for a satisfactory solution to Hume's problem of induction, Kant undertakes that task beyond the Second Analogy. In this respect, my dissertation contributes to the literature by (i) demonstrating the false dichotomy between the weak and the strong readings, which respectively assume that in the Second Analogy Kant is either concerned only with the Causal Principle or he is concerned with Hume's problem of induction and (ii) offering a middle ground that fits better in Kant's overall project both textually and philosophically.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Hume ve Kant'ta nedensellik

    Hume's and Kant's causality

    SERAP ELDERE

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2008

    FelsefeMuğla Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Bölümü

    DOÇ. DR. ŞAHABETTİN YALÇIN

  2. Kant felsefesinde özgürlük kavramının prusya feodalitesindeki politik temelleri

    Political origins of the kant's concept of freedom in prussian feudalism

    FERHAT TOKYÜREK

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    Siyasal BilimlerHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ÖRSAN ÖCAL AKBULUT

  3. Klasik İslam ahlâk felsefesi ile Kant'ın ödev ahlâkı arasında Ali Kemal'in İlm-i Ahlâk adlı eseri

    Between classical Islamic ethic and Kant's duty ethic: Ali Kemal's book titled Ilm-i Ahlak

    AYŞENUR DEMİRHAN KÜÇÜKALİ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    Felsefeİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ İLKER KÖMBE

  4. John Hick'in dinî çoğulculuk anlayışının Kantçı temeli ve problemleri

    The Kantian basis and problems of John Kick's understanding of religious pluralism

    FATMA GÜLER

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2023

    DinMarmara Üniversitesi

    Felsefe ve Din Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. RAHİM ACAR

  5. Uçurumun iki yakası: Hannah Arendt'te siyaset ve felsefe

    Two sides of the abyss: Politics and philosophy of Hannah Arendt

    SELEN NAMUR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2018

    FelsefeMaltepe Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. AHU TUNÇEL