Türk Hukuku ve uygulamasında banka yönetim kurulu üyelerinin hukuki sorumluluğu
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 41597
- Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. CELAL GÖLE
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Hukuk, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 1995
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 124
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
116 SUMMARY In our thesis we anal i zed the legal responsibilities of bank board of directors with respect to Turkish Law. Our thesis has three main chapters. In the first chapter, the membership of bank board of directors is explained with an emphasis on their numbers and their qualities. After the basic concept of“membership”is explained, the responsibilities of the members are anal i zed mainly by taking into the consideration of Turkish Commercial Code. In addition to Turkish Commercial Code, the responsibilities of the members of the bank board of directors are also regulated by Turkish Banking Code. As a general principle, the members of bank board of directors have not personal liabilities from the transactions which they had made on behalf of the bank. However, according to article 336 of Turkish Commercial Code, the members have joint responsibility against the company, the shareholders and the creditors. Although it seems to be a personal responsibility, it is in fact an indemnity responsibility which stems from the faults of the members. The only exception of the irresponsibility of the members which act on behalf of the bank is the“personal responsibility”which is explained in the article 69 of Turkish Banking Code. If the members of the bank board of directors weaken the financial condition of the bank by their illegal decisions and transactions, it is possible to demand their personal bankruptcy because of the debts of the bank by this article.117 Although it is against the general rules of Turkish Commercial Code and Execution and Bankrupt Law, and although the members are not merchants themselves, according to this exceptional responsibility the members could bankrupt because of a debt which is not their personal debt. However this article did not explain the time schedule and the procedure of this personal bankruptcy, although it is a really heavy responsibility for the members. The“personal responsibility”concept, stems from the need to regulate the banking sector and to protect the right of the depositors. Hence, the conditions of this responsibility should be explained in detail and we recommend an alternative regulation to protect the financial conditions of the banks without a need to finally asking the personal bankruptcy of the members of the bank board of directors.
Benzer Tezler
- Anonim şirket yönetim kurulu üyelerinin farklılaştırılmış müteselsil sorumluluğu
Differantiated joint liability of board of directors
RUVEYDA GÜLMİSAL AKKALE
- Türkiye iktisat politikalarının belirlenmesinde iktisadi kurum-kural ve kuruluşların rolleri
Başlık çevirisi yok
İBRAHİM GÜRAN YUMUŞAK
- Mevduat rehni
Pledge on bank accounts
MERVE ARDIÇ TÜKEN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2023
HukukGalatasaray ÜniversitesiÖzel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. HÜSEYİN MURAT DEVELİOĞLU
- İşverenin yönetim hakkı ve sınırları
Le droit et les limites de gestion de l'employeur
MAKBULE AYMELEK ERDEMİR
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2014
HukukGalatasaray ÜniversitesiÖzel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ENVER MURAT ENGİN
- Uluslararası boyutuyla vergi incelemeleri
Tax examinations with international aspects
CANSU DAĞ BEREKET