Critically evaluate the effect of a jurisdiction clause in determining whether court proceedings will be stayed on the ground of Lis Pendens
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 518212
- Danışmanlar: Dr. JONATHAN HARRIS
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Hukuk, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2016
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: King's College London
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 67
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
Current developments in international trade gave rise to an increase in transnational litigation. Parties who wish to achieve the most optimal outcome are inclined to forum shop and such an inclination gave rise to the risk of parallel actions. In addition to that, the general desire of the parties of an international commercial litigation is to remove the ambiguity concerning the determination of the competent court that has the authority to resolve the dispute. By virtue of the principal of party autonomy, the parties have been given the opportunity to choose the competent court, as they deem appropriate. However, such autonomy in the designation of the competent court does not always entirely remove jurisdictional conflicts. Common law jurisdictions use discretionary mechanisms such as anti-suit injunctions and forum non conveniens to preclude the risk of conflicting actions. On the contrary, civil law countries, particularly the EU jurisdictional regime, have adopted strict mechanical rules to prevent parallel actions. For this regard, this paper will concentrate on the effects of a jurisdiction agreement in granting a stay to court proceedings on grounds of lis pendens. In brief, this study will primarily analyse the principle of lis pendens and its application amongst the Brussels regime, common law and Turkish law. Thereafter, the choice-of-court agreements and their scope of application in different jurisdictions will be thoroughly examined and lastly by determining the competing situations arising out of the relationship between jurisdiction agreements and parallel actions, possible problematic scenarios and solution proposals will tried to be presented.
Benzer Tezler
- Hukuk güvenliği bakımından mülkiyet hakkına vergisel müdahaleler: AİHM kararları ışığında bir inceleme
Tax interventions on right to property in terms of legal security: An examination in the light of ECHR decisions
AYŞE NUR YAYLA
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2023
HukukGalatasaray ÜniversitesiKamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ BALCA ÇELENER
- Mülkiyet hakkına konu olmayan gayrimenkullerde gayrimenkule bağlı devredilebilen hakların değer tespiti
Appraisal of transferable partial property ownership rights
ZEYNEP POYRAZ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2018
Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlamaİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiGayrimenkul Geliştirme Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. FUNDA YİRMİBEŞOĞLU
- Kişisel verilerin sözleşmeye konu olması
Başlık çevirisi yok
MUHAMMET EMİRHAN HAVAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2023
HukukGalatasaray ÜniversitesiÖzel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. HÜSEYİN MURAT DEVELİOĞLU
- Seyir emniyetinde insan hatası risk analizi ve insan faktörleri temelinde köprüüstü dizaynına yönelik kural önerileri
Human error risk analysis in navigational safety and human factors based rule recommendations on bridge design
RİFAT BURKAY ALAN
Doktora
Türkçe
2021
Denizcilikİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiGemi İnşaatı ve Gemi Makineleri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. OĞUZ SALİM SÖĞÜT
- Birinci Meclis Döneminde siyasal rejim ve yürütme erki 1920-1923
Political regime and the executive power in the First Term of The Assembly 1920-1923
SİNEM ŞİRİN