Geri Dön

Confiscation by the ruler: A study of the Ottoman practice of Musadere, 1700s-1839

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 542242
  2. Yazar: YASİN ARSLANTAŞ
  3. Danışmanlar: Dr. TIRTHANKAR ROY
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Tarih, Siyasal Bilimler, History, Political Science
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2017
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Unıversıty Of London - London School Of Economıcs And Polıtıcal Scıence
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

This thesis examines the practice of confiscation in the Ottoman Empire during the long-eighteenth century. It investigates what enabled, guided and motivated the sovereign to confiscate the property of elites, and how and to what extent this occurred. The contribution of this thesis is twofold. First, it provides the first systematic analysis of the practice of confiscation in the Ottoman Empire, highlighting the basis of selectivity in its application. Second, it contributes to a broader line of literature by analysing the drivers, informal constraints and persistence of historical state predation. One of the strengths of the thesis is its combination of theory and a rich variety of archival evidence, using both qualitative and quantitative techniques. The thesis finds that müsadere was a selective institution targeting mainly office-holders and private tax contractors. However, some were less likely to face or more capable of avoiding confiscation than others mainly due to factors related to time and location of confiscation, the bargaining position of the wealth-holder and the attributes of their wealth. Although confiscation was costly and time-consuming to enforce, the sultans were continuously interested in it because of its political and redistributive functions such as monitoring the behaviour of their agents and protecting their share in the fiscal revenue from fiscal intermediaries. They had power to do so primarily because of many disincentives of collective action among the targets of confiscation. Through the study of this practice, this thesis shows how an early modern monarch, who was not formally constrained, could and did confiscate the elite property in a time of crisis.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Ebû Saîd Muhammed El Hâdimî'nin kelâmi görüşleri

    Ebû Saîd Muḥammad al-Ḥādimī's kalām views

    KADİR DEMİRLENK

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2025

    DinÇukurova Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. İSMAİL ŞIK

  2. Yüzey aktif maddelerin ve detarjanların biyolojik parçalanbilirliği

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    HASAN ZOR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1988

    Çevre MühendisliğiDokuz Eylül Üniversitesi

    Çevre Teknolojileri Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. FÜSUN ŞENGÜL

  3. Effect of electrode type, reactor configuration and substrate temperature on the plasma polymers of acrylonitrile and hexamethydisiloxane

    Elektrod türü reaktör konfigürasyonu ve yüzey sıcaklığının hekzametildisiloksan ve akrilonitril plazma polimerleri üzerindeki etkileri

    NURSEL DİLSİZ

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    1989

    KimyaOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    PROF. DR. GÜNERİ AKOVALI

  4. İmalat işletmelerinde yabancı kaynak kullanımı analizi ve Eti Şirketler Grubu'nda bir uygulama

    Analsis of using foreing source in prodictive constitutions and a practice in the proup of Eti companies

    HÜSEYİN SÖNMEZER

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1989

    İşletmeAnadolu Üniversitesi

    PROF.DR. FERRUH ÇÖMLEKÇİ