Geri Dön

Confiscation by the ruler: A study of the Ottoman practice of Musadere, 1700s-1839

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 542242
  2. Yazar: YASİN ARSLANTAŞ
  3. Danışmanlar: Dr. TIRTHANKAR ROY
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Siyasal Bilimler, Tarih, Political Science, History
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2017
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: University of London - London School of Economics and Political Science
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 272

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

This thesis examines the practice of confiscation in the Ottoman Empire during the long-eighteenth century. It investigates what enabled, guided and motivated the sovereign to confiscate the property of elites, and how and to what extent this occurred. The contribution of this thesis is twofold. First, it provides the first systematic analysis of the practice of confiscation in the Ottoman Empire, highlighting the basis of selectivity in its application. Second, it contributes to a broader line of literature by analysing the drivers, informal constraints and persistence of historical state predation. One of the strengths of the thesis is its combination of theory and a rich variety of archival evidence, using both qualitative and quantitative techniques. The thesis finds that müsadere was a selective institution targeting mainly office-holders and private tax contractors. However, some were less likely to face or more capable of avoiding confiscation than others mainly due to factors related to time and location of confiscation, the bargaining position of the wealth-holder and the attributes of their wealth. Although confiscation was costly and time-consuming to enforce, the sultans were continuously interested in it because of its political and redistributive functions such as monitoring the behaviour of their agents and protecting their share in the fiscal revenue from fiscal intermediaries. They had power to do so primarily because of many disincentives of collective action among the targets of confiscation. Through the study of this practice, this thesis shows how an early modern monarch, who was not formally constrained, could and did confiscate the elite property in a time of crisis.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Konya Etnografya Müzesinde bulunan imparator Traianus ve Hadrianus dönemine ait imparatorluk sikkeleri

    Konya Ethnography Museum in the imperial coins belonging to the emperor Trajan and Hadrian period

    NURİYE ÇAKMAKCI

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2009

    ArkeolojiSelçuk Üniversitesi

    Arkeoloji Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. AHMET A. TIRPAN

  2. Mülkiyet hakkı bağlamında gümrük kaçakçılığı suçlarına uygulanan tedbir ve yaptırımlar

    Measures and sanctions applied to crimes of customs smuggling within the context of the right to property

    TARIK MAVİLİ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2022

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ÖZEN ÜLGEN ADADAĞ

  3. Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununda bir koruma tedbiri olarak el koyma

    Confiscation as a protective measure at Criminal Adjudication Law

    MAKSUT YILDIZ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2010

    HukukErciyes Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. HAYRETTİN EREN

  4. Kazakistan'da Sovyet siyaseti

    Soviet policy in Kazakhstan

    LAZZAT AUYESSOVA

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2010

    Tarihİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Tarih Bölümü

    DOÇ. DR. HALİL BAL

  5. Türk Ceza Hukukunda müsadere kurumu

    Confiscation institution in Turkish Criminal Code

    HÜSEYİN ACAR

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    HukukÇankaya Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. DOĞAN SOYASLAN