Geri Dön

2012-2019 yılları arasında ülkemizde acil servis çalışanları hakkında ve acil servis çalışanları tarafından açılmış ve yargıtay tarafından karara bağlanmış davalar ve sonuçlarının incelenmesi

Examination of the results of the lawsuits filed against and filed by the emergency department workers in our country between the years of 2012-2019

  1. Tez No: 643122
  2. Yazar: ELİF SİNANOĞLU DOĞAN
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. BEHÇET AL
  4. Tez Türü: Tıpta Uzmanlık
  5. Konular: Adli Tıp, İlk ve Acil Yardım, Forensic Medicine, Emergency and First Aid
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2020
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Gaziantep Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Tıp Fakültesi
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Acil Tıp Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 186

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

AIM: In this study, we examined the malpractice and white code cases faced by emergency service workers between 2012 and 2019 and investigated how these cases were concluded by the Supreme Court. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In order to examine the results of the cases opened by Emergency Service Employees and against Emergency Service Employees between 01.01.2012 and 31.12.2019, the results of the lawsuits were reached through the link of 'yargıtay.gov.tr' and the results were analyzed retrospectively. FINDINGS: In this regard, 37 court results were submitted to the Supreme Court and concluded. Under the title of malpractice, the most frequent lawsuit was filed for misconduct (77.8%) and 77.8% of the lawsuits were filed against physicians. When the content of the case was read, the healthcare workers were mostly (55.6%) accused of causing death. 77.7 % of the malpractice cases were reversed by the Supreme Court and the remaining 22.2% was approved by the Supreme Court. In the lawsuits filed due to violence against healthcare professionals, the most common subject was the resistance (46.4%). It was followed by insulting healthcare workers (25%), damage to public property (17.9%) and deliberate injury (7.1%), and threatening employees (3.6%) was the subject of lawsuit. While the patient himself (64.3%) used violence the most, his relatives (35.7%) used violence in the second place. The healthcare workers who activated the white code system were determined as physicians (64.3%), security guards (21.4%), assistant health personnel (7.1%) and nurses (7.1%), respectively. 46.4% of these cases were sent back to the first court after being deemed incorrect in terms of procedure; 42.9% was repaired and 10.7% was deteriorated. RESULTS: Most of the lawsuits brought against healthcare professionals are under the title of misconduct. The most important reason for giving a white code is“resistance to duty”Approximately half of the cases in this group are deemed incorrect by the Court of Cassation in terms of procedure and are sent back to local courts. KEYWORDS: White code, Healthcare workers, Violence, Malpractice, Emergency department

Benzer Tezler

  1. Penetran yaralanmaya bağlı ölüm olgularında anatomik travma skorlarının değerlendirilmesi

    Evaluation of anatomical trauma scores in penetrating trauma deaths

    GİZEM MURATOĞLU

    Tıpta Uzmanlık

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    Adli TıpHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi

    Adli Tıp Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ADNAN ÇELİKEL

  2. Assessment of urbanization history of Addis Ababa city, Ethiopia

    Addıs Ababa cıty, Ethıopıa'nın kentleşme tarihinin değerlendirilmesi

    ABDURAHMAN HUSSEN YIMER

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2023

    Şehircilik ve Bölge PlanlamaMersin Üniversitesi

    Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ALİ CENAP YOLOĞLU

  3. Finansal tablo hilelerinin tespit edilmesinde kullanılan veri madenciliği yöntemleri ve Borsa İstanbul'da bir uygulama

    Data mining methods used to determine financial statement frauds and an application in Borsa Istanbul

    İSA KILIÇ

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    İşletmeOsmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi

    İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ SERVET ÖNAL

  4. Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi ve Anayasa Mahkemesi kararları ışığında mahkemeye erişim hakkı

    The right to access to court in the light of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkey

    FUNDA GÖRGÜLÜ ERGENÇ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    HukukKocaeli Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. MÜSLÜM AKINCI

  5. Türkiye'deki ulusal atık verilerinin değerlendirilmesi

    Evaluation of national waste data in Turkey

    BATUHAN AŞCI

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    Çevre MühendisliğiHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Çevre Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. SELİM LATİF SANİN