Geri Dön

Evaluation of Financial Assistance Prohibition on Leveraged Buyouts: IsProhibition in Turkish Law avoidable through Merger LBO's as in some EU countries?

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 708619
  2. Yazar: BATUHAN ALTINTAŞ
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. JONATHAN HARDMAN
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Hukuk, Law
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2022
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: The University of Glasgow
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 60

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

The financial assistance prohibition owes its existence in today's company law to leveraged buyouts (LBOs). The main reason for the emergence of the prohibition is, in the past, LBOs were considered as harmful transactions that must be prevented. Actually, when the prohibition is evaluated on its own, it is not clear exactly what or who it intends to protect, and whether it can effectively fulfill this function is highly controversial. For this reason, it is even claimed that the prohibition is unnecessary. Nonetheless there is one thing that prohibition can certainly achieve: it can prevent LBO transactions. But, whilst the only substantial achievement of the prohibition is to prevent LBOs, what would happen if LBO transactions are no longer considered harmful, or even on the contrary, if they are considered beneficial? The answer to this question is simple: in this case the financial assistance prohibition itself will be considered as harmful. This is exactly what is happening in today's company law. Nowadays, LBOs are considered as beneficial and value creating transactions. As a result, the prohibition on financial assistance is significantly discredited by the literature and its mere presence in the modern company law started to be questioned. So much so that LBOs, which have given life to the prohibition in the past, now seem to bring an end to prohibition. Consequently, the first part of our dissertation focuses on this“Toxic”relationship between the financial assistance prohibition and LBOs. With the recent developments of LBO transactions, it has been shown that the prohibition has no place in the modern company law. We said that the only thing that the prohibition can achieve is to prevent LBOs. But is the prohibition intact? Not so much, as we put forward in our dissertation. The prohibition entered into force in Turkey in 2012. But in the post-2012 period while the prohibition is effective, private equity which uses LBOs as an instrument for their investments has continued to increase its share in the Turkish buyout market. A similar situation has been observed in EU. Especially In the early 2000s, the EU buyout market has flourished despite the prohibition. This is because II the market has developed methods to circumvent the prohibition. Merger Leveraged Buyout (MLBO) is one of these methods. They are widely used specially in countries such as Germany and Netherlands. The last part of our thesis is devoted entirely to MLBOs and we argued that MLBOs are valid transactions which can also be used in Turkey. In this context, we believe there are three ways for Turkey to handle this situation: firstly, abolishing the prohibition entirely which can be legally avoided by using MLBOs; secondly, making legal arrangements to prevent market actors from using MLBOs; and finally, laying down conditions under which the MLBOs are valid.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Türkiye'de su hakkı

    The right to water in Turkey

    YILDIZ AKEL ÜNAL

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ERDOĞAN BÜLBÜL

  2. Türkiye'deki katılım bankalarının islami sosyal finans kavramı çerçevesinden değerlendirilmesi

    Evaluation of participation banks in Türkiye within the concept of islamic social finance

    MUAMMER DEMİR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    BankacılıkMarmara Üniversitesi

    İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ SAİME KAVAKCI

  3. Yargıtay'ın anonim ve limited şirket faaliyetleri kapsamında işlenen vergi kaçakçılığı suçlarında kanuni temsilcinin sorumluluğuna ilişkin yaklaşımının değerlendirilmesi

    Evaluation of the Court of cassation's approach to the liability of the legal representative for tax evasion crimes committed within the scope of corporation and limited liability company activities

    MERT ANIL GÜLER

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ BALCA ÇELENER

  4. Finansal destek yasağının birleşme ve devralmalar bakımından değerlendirilmesi

    Evaluation of financial assistance restrictions in terms of mergers and acquisitions

    CEREN HAZAL TUNÇAY

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2017

    Hukukİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi

    Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. GÜL OKUTAN NİLSSON

  5. Avrupa Birliği bölgesel politikaları ve Türkiye'de uygulanabilirliği: Serhat Kalkınma Ajansı üzerne bir inceleme

    Regional development agencies in the European Union and applicability in Turkey: An evaluation of Serhat Development Agency

    ZEYNEP CEYLİN ECER

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    Kamu YönetimiArdahan Üniversitesi

    Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ ONUR AKÇAKAYA