Geri Dön

From Open Door Policy to Restriction: The Cases of Sweden and Germany : Changing State Policies as a Response to EU's Dysfunctional Asylum Law

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 722049
  2. Yazar: MAVERA KAYMAKCI
  3. Danışmanlar: Belirtilmemiş.
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Kamu Yönetimi, Siyasal Bilimler, Public Administration, Political Science
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: EU Asylum Law, CEAS, Sweden, Germany, radical extremism, xenophobia, policy-making, social movements
  7. Yıl: 2017
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: University of Warwick
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 54

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

The function of the EU Asylum Law is questioned commonly since the EU system has been shattered by the solidarity crisis with the inability to cope with the flow of asylum seekers from Mediterranean. The Member States chose to take their own routes rather than following the international law. With no effective sanctions against the Member States that do not comply with the agreed requirements, the EU could not support the Member States that want to contribute the solidarity by managing the refugee crisis in a humanitarian way. The internal consequences varied in each country according to their unique method of dealing with this issue, but some countries have seen harsher impacts and the purpose of this article is to present the cases as such. The current climate in Sweden and Germany as the central figures known for the open-border policies in the initial phases of the crisis, has been changed with the reforms in their domestic law, administrative policies, and social structures. The rise of nationalist and radical extremist movements accelerated which are fought by the pro-foreigner movements. Interestingly, while the radical extremist political parties attract higher number of supporters from the public, the social tensions are overlooked. The politics behind such social issues in relation to the administrative and legislative areas will be discussed throughout this paper with an interdisciplinary perspective.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Kitle iletişim özgürlüğünün sınırı olarak Türk Hukukunda adil yargılanma hakkına karşı suçlar

    The offences against the right to a fair trial in Turkish Law as the restriction of freedom of mass communication

    DİLEK EKMEKÇİ

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2013

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ÜMİT KOCASAKAL

  2. Uluslararası yatırım hukukunda adil ve hakkaniyetli muamele

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    ÖZGÜR OCAKHAN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2025

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. AKİF EMRE ÖKTEM

  3. Göç politikası: Afganistan-Pakistan ve Suriye-Türkiye göçleri karşılaştırması

    Migration policy: A comparison of Afghanistan-Pakistan and Syria-Turkey migration

    TAHA MERT ÇUBUK

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2025

    Siyasal Bilimlerİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ŞENOL ARSLANTAŞ

  4. Muhafazakâr siyasi partilerin karşılaştırmalı göç politikası analizi: CDU, Muhafazakâr Parti ve AK Parti örnekleri

    Comparative migration policy analysis of conservative political parties: CDU, Conservative Party and AK Party samples

    MEHMET ÖZÇELİK

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    Kamu YönetimiNecmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi

    Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. MEHMET KOCAOĞLU

  5. 1984 by George Orwell from different aspects

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    VEDAT ŞAFAK YAMI

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    1993

    İngiliz Dili ve EdebiyatıSelçuk Üniversitesi

    Batı Dilleri ve Edebiyatları Ana Bilim Dalı

    Y.DOÇ.DR. HASAN İNAL