From Open Door Policy to Restriction: The Cases of Sweden and Germany : Changing State Policies as a Response to EU's Dysfunctional Asylum Law
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 722049
- Danışmanlar: Belirtilmemiş.
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Siyasal Bilimler, Kamu Yönetimi, Political Science, Public Administration
- Anahtar Kelimeler: EU Asylum Law, CEAS, Sweden, Germany, radical extremism, xenophobia, policy-making, social movements
- Yıl: 2017
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Unıversıty Of Warwıck
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
The function of the EU Asylum Law is questioned commonly since the EU system has been shattered by the solidarity crisis with the inability to cope with the flow of asylum seekers from Mediterranean. The Member States chose to take their own routes rather than following the international law. With no effective sanctions against the Member States that do not comply with the agreed requirements, the EU could not support the Member States that want to contribute the solidarity by managing the refugee crisis in a humanitarian way. The internal consequences varied in each country according to their unique method of dealing with this issue, but some countries have seen harsher impacts and the purpose of this article is to present the cases as such. The current climate in Sweden and Germany as the central figures known for the open-border policies in the initial phases of the crisis, has been changed with the reforms in their domestic law, administrative policies, and social structures. The rise of nationalist and radical extremist movements accelerated which are fought by the pro-foreigner movements. Interestingly, while the radical extremist political parties attract higher number of supporters from the public, the social tensions are overlooked. The politics behind such social issues in relation to the administrative and legislative areas will be discussed throughout this paper with an interdisciplinary perspective.
Benzer Tezler
- Kitle iletişim özgürlüğünün sınırı olarak Türk Hukukunda adil yargılanma hakkına karşı suçlar
The offences against the right to a fair trial in Turkish Law as the restriction of freedom of mass communication
DİLEK EKMEKÇİ
- Türk ve Avrupa Topluluğu Rekabet Hukukunda pazar paylaşımı ve pazara girişin engellenmesine yönelik anlaşmalar
Market sharing and the agreements on prevention of entry to the market according to the Turkish and European Community's Competition Law
ARZU ÖZGEN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2023
HukukGalatasaray ÜniversitesiKamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. HALİL ERCÜMENT ERDEM
- Para piyasasında banka dışı mali kesimde finansal farklılaşma: Factoring, forfaiting, leasing ve özel finans kurumları
Başlık çevirisi yok
MÜGEHAN ACARASLAN
- Muhafazakâr siyasi partilerin karşılaştırmalı göç politikası analizi: CDU, Muhafazakâr Parti ve AK Parti örnekleri
Comparative migration policy analysis of conservative political parties: CDU, Conservative Party and AK Party samples
MEHMET ÖZÇELİK
Doktora
Türkçe
2024
Kamu YönetimiNecmettin Erbakan ÜniversitesiSiyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. MEHMET KOCAOĞLU