Is the practice of border closure compatible with international refugee obligations and which international body is able to assess the legality of this practice?
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 724849
- Danışmanlar: Belirtilmemiş.
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Kamu Yönetimi, Siyasal Bilimler, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Public Administration, Political Science, International Relations
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2016
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: The University of Reading
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 75
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
Persons who have been subjected to unwanted persecution in their country of origin or habitual residence might ultimately flee their country of origin or habitual residence and seek asylum to live in other countries in Europe, America or Australia for decades, to enjoy international protection from war and/or persecution. To this end, for persons trying to cross borders, some States are applying, inter alia, the practice of border closure for security reasons. The concept of“border”is a key element for a country concerned with identity and security. However, International Refugee Law protects refugees' rights at the international level. The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees includes the principle of nonrefoulement, which forbids States from sending individuals back to their country of origin or any other country where they would be exposed to persecution. For this reason, interpretation of the scope of the principle of non-refoulement is crucial to determining the legal rights of refugees as well as the obligations of States. Even though the principle of non-refoulement prohibits States from expelling or returning a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where there would be a risk of persecution, this issue is frequently ignored by States through the practice of border closure. The purpose of this paper is to argue that the principle of non-refoulement, as laid down in the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol, as well as other international and regional refugee and human rights instruments dealing with the principle of non-refoulement, does indeed apply beyond the territory of the Contracting States. We analyse the contemporary phenomenon of the practice of border closure concerning its compatibility with the principle of non-refoulement, and highlight judicial organisations in terms of assessing the legality of the border closure practice
Benzer Tezler
- Çek valflerinin dinamik davranışlarının analizi
Dynamic behaviour analysis of reflux valves
LEVENT KAVURMACIOĞLU
- Yunanistan Kumçiftliği (Orestiada) Gagauzları (tarih, dil ve kültür)
Gagauzes of Greece in Kumçiftliği (Orestiada) (history, language and culture)
EVRİM KAŞIKÇI
Doktora
Türkçe
2021
Halk Bilimi (Folklor)Trakya ÜniversitesiBalkan Çalışmaları Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. AHMET GÜNŞEN
- Çankırı yöresi ormandan stebe geçiş zonundaki orman kuruluşları ve silvikültürel özellikleri
Forest structures and silvicultural characteristics of forest-steppe transition zone in Çankiri
FİGEN ÇAKIR
Doktora
Türkçe
2014
Ormancılık ve Orman Mühendisliğiİstanbul ÜniversitesiOrman Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. H.FERHAT BOZKUŞ
- Osmanlı Döneminde Erzurum Polis Mektebi (1911-1917)
Erzurum Police School of the Ottoman Period (1911-1917)
NURİ ENGİN