Jurisprudential regulations disagreed upon between the three Hanafiimams and their impact on jurisprudential subsections specificallysections of ablution and prayer: Collecting, studying and application
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 841487
- Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. ABDALLAH IBRAHIM AL KAYLANI
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Din, Religion
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2022
- Dil: Arapça
- Üniversite: University of Jordan (Al-Jami'ah Al-Urdunia)
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 152
Özet
This study aimed to identify jurisprudential regulations disagreed upon between the Three Hanafi Imams (Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam Abu Youssef and Imam Muhammad) in the sections of ablution and prayer, and show the extent of their impact on the branches of jurisprudence, and mention their jurisprudential subsections with its clarification. In the study, the researcher followed the inductive approach to collect the different jurisprudential regulations disagreed upon between the Three Hanafi Imams in the sections of ablution and prayer, the descriptive approach to explain the regulations and their impact on the jurisprudential subsections, the comparative approach to compare the evidences of the three imams with each other in their regulations, and the deductive approach to extract the relationship between these different jurisprudential regulations and their impact on the jurisprudential subsections. The study presented an explanation of the meaning of the jurisprudential regulation with a narration of its wordings and conditions of its cornerstones and the 140 difference between it and the related terms, and summarized the biography of the Three Hanafi Imams, after which it defined the different jurisprudential regulations of them, and explained under them the subject of dispute until it becomes clear where the disagreement and agreement is, and their evidence is listed in it with a delay of the most preferred statement - if any - to respond to the unpreferred saying, then the impact of those regulations on jurisprudential subsections was presented. Then the study reached ten different regulations in the section of ablution with thirty-four jurisprudential subsections falling under it, and seventeen different regulations in the section of prayer with ninety-one jurisprudential subsections falling under it; then explained them and concluded through all these that many of the disagreements in the jurisprudential subsections among the Three Hanafi Imams derives from the different regulations they have.
Özet (Çeviri)
Özet çevirisi mevcut değil.
Benzer Tezler
- Urisprudential regulations disagreed upon by hanafi imams and their impact on İmam's disagreements in section of selling
Başlık çevirisi yok
SELİM KARAKAŞ
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2022
DinUniversity of Jordan (Al-Jami'ah Al-Urdunia)PROF. DR. ALI MOHAMMED AL HUSSAIN AL MOUSA AL SAWA
- القواعد والضوابط الفقهية في كتاب المعاملات من كتاب الهداية
El-kavâid ve'd-Davâbıt el-Fıkhiyye fi'l-buyû' min Kitâbi'l- Hidâye li'l-Merginânî
SAMER RİHAN
Yüksek Lisans
Arapça
2018
DinYalova ÜniversitesiTemel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ PEHLÜL DÜZENLİ
- Execution of the European Human Rights Court's decisions and their effects in Turkish Domestic Law
Başlık çevirisi yok
MEHMET CEMİL BİLGİÇ
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2000
HukukFatih ÜniversitesiUluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ASLAN GÜNDÜZ
- Zekeriyya el-Ensâri' nin Esne'l-metâlib adlı eserinde fikhî kâideler (Muâmelât bölümü)
القواعد الفقهية في كتاب آسنى المطالب للشيخ زكريا الأنصاري (قسم المعاملات)
OMAR ABDULMEED AHMED AHMED
Yüksek Lisans
Arapça
2023
DinBingöl ÜniversitesiTemel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. İSMAİL NARİN
- Ahkâm ayeti kavramsallaştırması ve Ahkâmu'l-Kur'an literatürünün fıkhî değeri
Conceptualizing of ahkam verses and jurisprudential value of Ahkām al-Qur'ān literature
MUHAMMET KURTULUŞ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2021
DinBursa Uludağ ÜniversitesiTemel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. MEHMET SALİH KUMAŞ