Geri Dön

Guideliner for establishing criteria for the assessment of translation tests at YADİM Çukurova University

Çukurova Üniversitesi YADİM'de çeviri sınavlarının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılacak kriter oluşturma dayanakları

  1. Tez No: 89712
  2. Yazar: MELEK TÜRKMEN
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. NECMİ AKŞİT
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Eğitim ve Öğretim, İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı, Education and Training, English Language and Literature
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Değerlendirme, Dil öğretimi, Notlama sistemleri, Sınav, Yabancı dil öğretimi, Çeviri, İngilizce, Evaluation, Language teaching, Grading system, Examination, Foreign language teaching, Translation, English
  7. Yıl: 1999
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Öğretimi Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

translation process and formative evaluation and the problems perceived in summative evaluation were asked. In the observations, the teaching stages and then- sequencing and the distribution of teachers' feedback on various aspects of students' translations were observed. In the mock-exam markings, the same teachers marked eight student translations. To analyse the data collected through interviews, a coding technique was used. The frequencies and percentages of the themes under each category were quantified for each teacher and teachers' priorities were identified individually. The frequencies of teachers' feedback on various aspects of students' translations in the observed courses were quantified. The mock-exam papers marked by teachers were analysed, error categories were identified and teachers' priorities regarding the errors were determined. The results revealed that teachers differed in the ways they approached translation. Four teachers favoured information translation which took contextual elements of the source texts into consideration and six teachers favoured literal translation which mainly took the structures in the source text into consideration to the exclusion of contextual elements. In accordance with the methods they favoured, their materials selection criteria and evaluation priorities also differed. To minimise the discrepancies among teachers in the marking of the translation tests, an analytic scoring scale and guidelines for testing and marking were suggested.translation process and formative evaluation and the problems perceived in summative evaluation were asked. In the observations, the teaching stages and then- sequencing and the distribution of teachers' feedback on various aspects of students' translations were observed. In the mock-exam markings, the same teachers marked eight student translations. To analyse the data collected through interviews, a coding technique was used. The frequencies and percentages of the themes under each category were quantified for each teacher and teachers' priorities were identified individually. The frequencies of teachers' feedback on various aspects of students' translations in the observed courses were quantified. The mock-exam papers marked by teachers were analysed, error categories were identified and teachers' priorities regarding the errors were determined. The results revealed that teachers differed in the ways they approached translation. Four teachers favoured information translation which took contextual elements of the source texts into consideration and six teachers favoured literal translation which mainly took the structures in the source text into consideration to the exclusion of contextual elements. In accordance with the methods they favoured, their materials selection criteria and evaluation priorities also differed. To minimise the discrepancies among teachers in the marking of the translation tests, an analytic scoring scale and guidelines for testing and marking were suggested.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Determining the barriers and opportunities for the integration of extended reality in disaster management using MCDM methods

    Afet yönetiminde genişletilmiş gerçeklik teknolojilerinin entegrasyonu önündeki engeller ve fırsatların ÇKKV yöntemleriyle belirlenmesi

    EREN MERT KAŞ

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2025

    Bilim ve Teknolojiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı (disiplinlerarası)

    DOÇ. DR. ÖMER EKMECİOĞLU

  2. Türkiye'ye özgü içme suyu arıtma tesisleri skorlama sistemi modelinin oluşturulması ve tesislerin değerlendirilmesi

    Creating a scoring system model for drinking water treatment plants specific to Turkey and evaluation of the facilities

    CANSU BAYHAN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2025

    Çevre MühendisliğiAtatürk Üniversitesi

    Çevre Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ERGÜN YILDIZ

  3. Türkiye'nin farklı iklim bölgeleri için ilköğretim dersliklerinin doğal aydınlatma sistemi tasarımına ilişkin bir yaklaşım

    An approach to the natural lighting system design of primary school classrooms for different climate regions in Türkiye

    GÖKÇE ERDEMİR ŞENDUR

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2025

    Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Mimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. ALPİN KÖKNEL YENER

  4. A data-driven approach to identifying and selecting temporary disaster debris management sites: The case of Istanbul

    Geçici afet moloz yönetim alanlarının belirlenmesi ve seçimi için veri odaklı bir yaklaşım: İstanbul örneği

    BURAK KABAKLI

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2025

    Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Endüstri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ŞEYDA SERDAR ASAN

  5. Sürdürülebilir yapım kavramının uygulamaya aktarılmasındaki araç, yöntem ve yaklaşımlara ilişkin bir değerlendirme

    Evaluation of tools, methods and approaches conveying sustainable construction concept to the practice

    PINAR YORGANCIOĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2004

    Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Mimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ALAATTİN KANOĞLU