Geri Dön

Strategies of EFL teachers and students in correcting and revising composition errors

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 15338
  2. Yazar: ŞAHİN GÖK
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. LİONEL KAUFMAN
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Eğitim ve Öğretim, Education and Training
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Yabancı dil öğretimi, İngilizce, Foreign language teaching, English
  7. Yıl: 1991
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

ABSTRACT STRATEGIES OF EFL TEACHERS AND STUDENTS IN CORRECTING AND REVISING COMPOSITION ERRORS Since EFL teachers are traditionally interested more in the form than in the content of student compositions and spend more time correcting syntactic and mechanical errors than content ones, this study investigates how EFL teachers correct errors and how their students revise them. Four hypotheses were tested and observations were made concerning strategies of teacher correction and student revision. In the first part, it was hypothesized that EFL teachers are interested more in the form than in the content of student compositions and that the students, *?-??? following the teachers' instructions, consequently will revise more form-based errors than content or organizational ones. The results of two independent t-tests indicate that teachers marked significantly more (p<.001) syntactic and mechanical errors than content and organizational errors while students revised significantly more (p<.001) syntactic and -meehan-ieal- errors-than -content and organizational ones. Thus, these results have confirmed the validity of the hypothesis that EFL teachers focus more on the form than on the content of the student compositions and that students do the same in the revision process.In the first part, it was also hypothesized that there would be no significant difference between the types and numbers of errors corrected by the teacher and those revised by the students. The results have confirmed this hypothesis. A Chi-Square test has shown (X2=0.34) no significant difference between teachers and students in their correcting and revision strategies, respectively. In the second part, it was hypothesized that since teachers are more interested in syntactic and mechanical errors than in content and organizational ones, consequently they will be more satisfied with revisions of the former than with those of the latter. Although the teachers were more satisfied with the revisions of syntactic and mechanical errors than with content and organizational ones (80% to 72%), the Chi- Square Test shows no significant difference (X2=1.40) between the two categories of teacher satisfaction. Thus, this hypothesis was rejected. With regard to the teachers' correction strategies, teachers were found correcting student composition errors by simply writing the correct version of errors (55%) or using correcting code letters (29.2%) rather than explaining errors or giving clues to the students (15.7%) to draw their attention to errors. While correcting the errors by“writingcorrect version of errors”it was observed that some teachers made their own grammatical mistakes in correcting and confused the students. As a result, this study revealed Turkish EFL teachers' lack of concern for content and organization of student compositions and their over-emphasis on syntax and mechanics. Many of the examples confirm these hypotheses in question. Finally, some suggestions were made for further research in order to solve these problems.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Tez No

    89919

    Strategies on EFL teachers evaluation and students progress in writing by means of free writing approach

    İngilizce öğretmenlerinin değerlendirme kriterleri ve serbest yazma metodunda öğrenci gelişimi

    CEM KELEŞOĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    1999

    İngiliz Dili ve EdebiyatıAtatürk Üniversitesi

    İngiliz Dili Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. ŞAHİN GÖK

  2. Tez No

    21524

    The Relationship between teachers and students preferences for error correction strategies in classroom conversation

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    ŞENOL KUL

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    1992

    Eğitim ve Öğretimİhsan Doğramacı Bilkent Üniversitesi

    DR. LİONEL KAUFMAN

  3. Tez No

    148169

    Biçim ve anlam odaklı derslerde yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin kullandıkları yanlış düzeltme yolları ve öğrencilerin verdikleri karşılıklar

    The error correction strategies EFL teachers use and learner uptakes in form-focused and meaning-focused lessons

    BAHAR HELVACI

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2004

    Eğitim ve ÖğretimYıldız Teknik Üniversitesi

    Eğitim Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. NESRİN TOKSÖZ

  4. Tez No

    730643

    The perceptions and preferences of teachers and learners towards corrective feedback in EFL speaking class in Turkey

    Türkiye'de İngilizce'nin yabancı dil olarak öğretildiği konuşma sınıflarındaki öğretmenlerin ve öğrencilerin düzeltici dönüte yönelik görüşleri ve tercihleri

    ALI HASHEMI

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2022

    İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatıİstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi

    İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. VEYSEL KILIÇ

  5. Tez No

    831792

    The relationship between EFL teachers' literacy of writing assessment and students' writing achievement in portfolio assessment

    İngilizce öğretmenlerinin yazma değerlendirme okuryazarlığı ile portfolyo değerlendirmesinde öğrencilerin yazma başarısı arasındaki ilişki

    ESRA SEFERİNOĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2023

    Eğitim ve ÖğretimYeditepe Üniversitesi

    İngiliz Dili Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ YAVUZ KURT

Geri Dön