Geri Dön

The ethnobotany of wilf food plant use in the Konya Basin: A quantitative and ethnoarchaeological approach

Konya Ovası'nda yenilebilen yabani bitki kullanımlarının etnobotanisi: Nitel ve etnoarkeolojik bir yaklaşım

  1. Tez No: 181031
  2. Yazar: AYLAN ERKAL TSETSEKOS
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. MUSA DOĞAN, Y.DOÇ.DR. GEOFFREY SUMMERS
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Arkeometri, Archaeometry
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Neolithic, Central Anatolia, Ethnobotany, Ethnoarchaeology, Neolithic, Central Anatolia, Ethnobotany, Ethnoarchaeology
  7. Yıl: 2006
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Arkeometri Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

ABSTRACTTHE ETHNOBOTANY OF WILD FOOD PLANT USE IN THE KONYABASIN:A QUANTITATIVE AND ETHNOARCHAEOLOGICAL APPROACHErkal Tsetsekos, AylanM.Sc., Department of ArchaeometrySupervisor : Prof. Musa DoğanCo-Supervisor: Asst. Prof. Dr. Geoffrey SummersSeptember 2006, 231 pagesIn this ethnobotanical study, an ethnoarchaeological approach was adopted for thearchaeological implications of the importance of wild food plants and their dietary usesin the Neolithic and Chalcolithic Periods in Central Anatolia by exploring the dietaryuses of these plants by the modern villagers of Konya Basin. The study was based onthe indigenous knowledge of the modern villagers of Konya of managing wild foodplant resource in their surroundings for the dietary uses. This knowledge was exploredthrough ethnobotanical research strategies. The study was limited by both the researchsubject and the area for a better focus on the research. The geographical borders werelimited to Central Anatolia as it included Neolithic and Chalcolithic sites with detailedarchaeological investigations and it made a comparison available between differentgeographical zones. Because it was possible to study similar environments today in theKonya Basin, nine modern villages to collect ethnobotanical data were chosen fromthree different environmental zones in this area, which included wetland, forest andsteppe zones. The wild fruit, nut and tuber species recovered from the archaeologicalexcavations were selected for study in their current natural environments. The differentstrategies of harvesting, processing and storage local people used for the consumptionof each plant species provided useful implications to archaeological recoveries.

Özet (Çeviri)

ABSTRACTTHE ETHNOBOTANY OF WILD FOOD PLANT USE IN THE KONYABASIN:A QUANTITATIVE AND ETHNOARCHAEOLOGICAL APPROACHErkal Tsetsekos, AylanM.Sc., Department of ArchaeometrySupervisor : Prof. Musa DoğanCo-Supervisor: Asst. Prof. Dr. Geoffrey SummersSeptember 2006, 231 pagesIn this ethnobotanical study, an ethnoarchaeological approach was adopted for thearchaeological implications of the importance of wild food plants and their dietary usesin the Neolithic and Chalcolithic Periods in Central Anatolia by exploring the dietaryuses of these plants by the modern villagers of Konya Basin. The study was based onthe indigenous knowledge of the modern villagers of Konya of managing wild foodplant resource in their surroundings for the dietary uses. This knowledge was exploredthrough ethnobotanical research strategies. The study was limited by both the researchsubject and the area for a better focus on the research. The geographical borders werelimited to Central Anatolia as it included Neolithic and Chalcolithic sites with detailedarchaeological investigations and it made a comparison available between differentgeographical zones. Because it was possible to study similar environments today in theKonya Basin, nine modern villages to collect ethnobotanical data were chosen fromthree different environmental zones in this area, which included wetland, forest andsteppe zones. The wild fruit, nut and tuber species recovered from the archaeologicalexcavations were selected for study in their current natural environments. The differentstrategies of harvesting, processing and storage local people used for the consumptionof each plant species provided useful implications to archaeological recoveries.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Ayvacık (B1, Çanakkale) ve çevresinin etnobotaniği

    The Ethnobotany of Ayvacık (B1, Çanakkale) and its environs

    TÜLAY TÜTENOCAKLI

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2002

    BiyolojiÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi

    Biyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı

    Y.DOÇ.DR. İSMET UYSAL

  2. Reşadiye (A6, Tokat, Türkiye) ve çevresinin etnobotaniği

    The ethnobotany of Reşadiye (A6, Tokat, Turkey) and it?s environs

    ERKAN YÜZBAŞIOĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2010

    BotanikÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi

    Biyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. İSMET UYSAL

  3. Lapseki (A1/A), Çanakkale, Türkiye) ve çevresinin etnobotaniği

    The ethnobotany of Lapseki (A1/A), Canakkale, Turkey) and its environs

    BAHAR KÖKÇÜ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2015

    BotanikÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi

    Biyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. İSMET UYSAL

  4. Suşehri (Sivas) bölgesinin etnobotanik açıdan değerlendirilmesi

    The evaluation of ethnobotany on the area of Suşehri (Sivas)

    FERDA KURNAZ KARAGÖZ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2013

    BotanikAfyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi

    Biyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. AHMET SERTESER

  5. Akçakoca (Düzce) ilçesinin florası ve etnobotanik özellikleri

    Flora and ethnobotany of the Akçakoca district (Düzce)

    ASLI KOCA

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2003

    BiyolojiHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Biyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ŞİNASİ YILDIRIMLI