Geri Dön

Dolaylı vergiler ve Türkiye'nin AB'ye giriş sürecinde dolaylı vergiler uyumlaştırma çalışmaları

İndirect taxes and the harmonization studies og these taxes in Turkey during the integration of Turkey to The European Union

  1. Tez No: 210925
  2. Yazar: MEHMET ASLAN
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. MUHAMMET AKDİŞ
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Maliye, Finance
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2005
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Pamukkale Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Maliye Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 188

Özet

AB'nin ekonomik bütünlesmesinin bugünkü durumuna çesitli asamalardan geçilerek ulasılmıstır. 1957 yılında Roma Anlasması ile baslayan AB bütünlesme hareketi, üretim faktörlerinin serbest dolasımını içeren Tek Pazarın yürürlüge konmasıyla sürmüstür. Türkiye ise 1959 yılında AB'ye katılma istegini bildirmistir. AB bütünlesmesi, Maastrich Anlasmasının öngördügü gibi 1 Ocak 1999 tarihinde Euro'nun yürürlüge girmesiyle önemli bir asamaya ulasmıstır. Tüm bu hedeflerin gerçeklestirilebilmesi, kurucu anlasmalarda öngörülen ortak politikaların uygulanması ile mümkün olmustur. Bu konulardan bir tanesi de Roma Anlasması?nın ?Toplulugun Politikaları? baslıklı üçüncü kısımda yazılı olan“Vergilendirme Alanında Ortak”Politika konusudur.

Özet (Çeviri)

Economic integration of European Union gets its current position after some important stages. EU integration process had started with Treaty of Rome in 1957 and continued with Single Market that provides free movement of production factors. Turkey made its first application to join EEC in 1959. European integration came to important process with becoming operative of Euro as a currency at January 1st 1999 as of stated in Maastricht Treaty. Success of reaching for the goals was provided by implementing common policies that were projected in the Founding Treaties. One of the common policies is about taxation that is mentioned in the third part of the Treaty of Rome under the heading of ?Policies of Community The common policies about taxation also called tax adjustment is very important to attain the goals of EU. Since taxes are part of the national sovereignty and important tool that determine competitive conditions by effecting overall economic and social life. However taxes should not be taken as a competitive tool in Common Market in which competitive conditions are basically equal. In the foundation of the arrangement about common taxation policies of EU, taxes should be neutral that is not to harm free competition. In EU with the effect of Customs Union, the customs duties and charges having equivalent effect were discharged together with providing the consistency. Thus, the customs taxes were got rid of being a major problem. However, since the discrepancies among the member countries? internal legislations cause unfair competition in international trade, the elimination of these discrepancies was at the agenda. For the elimination aim of these differentiations, the member countries transferred their sovereignties concerning the taxes to the Union. Indirect taxes prevent the goods, capital and people from being freely moving and damage the competition by affecting the prices of goods entering the costs. As a result of this, the union foresaw the indirect taxes as an area of being harmonized. From that point of view, Value added tax and Private Consumption Tax (ÖTV), which can be assigned as union taxes, have exclusive significance. In this direction, Turkey has introduced the Value added tax (KDV) starting from the date of 1985 by taking the 6. Directive issued by EU Council as a model. In June 2002, the so-called law of Private Consumption tax numbered 4760 constituted the second major reconciliation with the Union. Turkey achieved important successes in the field of reconciliation of indirect taxes since 1980, which is the beginning date of reconciliation. The reconciliation of Customs taxes between the EU and Turkey has been almost completed. The reconciliation of KDV and ÖTV is still at the agenda. There are some articles about KDV & ÖTV both in and out of harmony with the EU applications. There are important stages been achieved but still not reached the full reconciliation yet.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Gümrük Birliği sürecinde Türkiye'nin demir çelik ticareti performansı: 1996 - 2014

    Iron and steel trade performance of Turkey in the Customs Union process: 1996 - 2014

    YASİN BIYIK

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    Ekonometriİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    İşletme Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. NEDİME LERZAN ÖZKALE

  2. The individual application to Turkey's Constitutional Court and its role in the development of human rights in Turkey

    Türkiye Anayasa Mahkemesi'ne bireysel başvuru ve bireysel başvurunun Türkiye'de insan haklarının gelişimi üzerindeki rolü

    TUĞÇE AYHAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2018

    HukukOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. NECATİ POLAT

  3. Türkiye ile Körfez ülkeleri arasında dış ticaret ilişkisinin incelenmesi -Çekim modeli yaklaşımı-

    An investigation on trade relations between Turkey and Gulf countries - Gravity model approach

    OSMAN ERK

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2015

    EkonometriGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. MUSTAFA BURAK GÜRBÜZ

  4. Türk Vergi Hukukunda ve Avrupa Birliğinde gümrük vergisi uyuşmazlıkları ve analizi

    Customs Duty Conflict in The Turkish Law and the European Union and its analysis

    TAYFUN ERCAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2010

    HukukGazi Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ŞÜKRÜ KIZILOT

  5. Demir çelik sektörü ve demir çelik sektöründe sermaye maliyeti

    Iron and steel sector and cost of capital in iron and steel sector

    ALİ DİKMEN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2002

    İşletmeMarmara Üniversitesi

    Sermaye Piyasası ve Borsa Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. MAHMUT HAYATİ ERİŞ