Bertrand Russell'a göre kötülük problemi
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 30539
- Danışmanlar: YRD. DOÇ. DR. TURAN KOÇ
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Felsefe, Philosophy
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 1994
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Erciyes Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 82
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
SUMMARY This research is prepared to examine opinions of parents' child's toys and games(between three to six years old) and whether these opinions differentiate according to different kind of variables. To apply this research, researcher is prepared 'inquiry' which has got experts' practical applications and also is enriched by the researcher's point of view. The environment of this research constituted by Ankara 's city center institutions and children private kindergardens leveled by parts of the city. All the illustrations are chosen by using the simple ittustriation methods. 250 children are selected among chosen kindergarden related with the number of children of these schools. To create the illustration, these children's mothers and also fathers are used. This illustration is determined 250 parents which being 250 fathers and 250 mothers. According to this results: A ccording to parents ' opinion games play important factor to development of child. Parents consider their child's self care more important J Parents, when they play with their children, consider different kind of factors such as j child's sex, age, and their own age. Most of them do not want to direct by themselves child's role which child can choose freely. Wliile child is selecting his or her game partner by himself for this concept mothers give more permission than fathers. Parents show a tendency to interrupt their child's game to do something by themselves. According to the research; mothers make this more than fathers. Again mothers show an interest their child's productivity in the games more than fathers show. Parents purchase toys to their child before their birth and generally in first 5 months. To the parents toys ' are important factor to their child 's development Generally toy selection being done together with parents and child and according to child's wish. Hlien the child, especially in 5-6 ages and male children, whether chosen toy is not matched with his or her sex, most of the parents do not want to accept it, then want their child to choose another on which is suit for him or he.sex.îzutsu, T., İslam Düşüncesinde İman Kavramı, çev. Selahaddin Ayaz, îst., 1984. Leaman, Oliver, İslam Felsefesine Giri§, çev. Turan Koç, Kayseri, 1992 Maturidi, Kitabu't-Tevhid, Nşn R Huleyf, 1st 1979. Ormsby, EX., Theodicy in Islamic Thought, (The Dispute Over al-Ghazalî's“Best of all Possible Worlds”), University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1984. Özcan, Hanefi, Maturîdide Bilgi Problemi, Mar. Ü.Î.F. Vak. Yay., 1st., 1993. Russell, B., A History of Western Phil. Unwin Paperbacks, London, 1984. Why I'm Not A Chiristian, ed. P. Edwards, Unwin Books, Lon don, 1967. The Problems of Phil. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 1983. Bilimden Beklediğimiz, çev. Avni Yakalıoğlu, îst., 1969. Felsefede İlmi Metod, çev. Hamdi Akverdi, 1st., 1940. Mistisizm ve Mantık, çev. Ayseli Usluata, 1st., 1972. Evlilik ve Ahlak, çev. Vasıf Eranus, 1st., 1983. Din ve Bilim, çev. Akşit Göktür, 1st., 1990. Aylaklığa Övgü, çev. Mete Ergin, 1st., 1992.“The Essence of Religion”, The Basic Writings ofB. Russell, ed. Robert E. Egner, Lester E. Denonn, George Allen Unwin Ltd. ss. 565-577, New York, 1961.“What is An Agnostic”The Basic Writings ofB. Russell, ed. Robert E.E. Lester E.D., s.s. 577-585 New York 1961.“A Free Man's Worship”The Basic Writings ofB. Russell, ed. Robert E.E. Lester E.D., ss. 66-73 New York 1961. Turgut, İhsan, Felsefenin Temel Sorunları, İzmir, 1991. Watt, W. M., İslam Düşüncesinin Teşekkül Devri, çev. Ethem Ruhi Fığlah, Ant, 1981. Weber, A., Felsefe Tarihi, çev. H. Vehbi Eralp, 1st., 1991. 76 1
Benzer Tezler
- Ölüm ve ötesinin kötülük problemi ile ilişkisi: Gazzâlî ve Bertrand Russell örneği
The relationship of death and beyond with the problem of evil: The example of Gazzali and Betrand Russell
SEDANUR GÜVENER
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2024
FelsefeTokat Gaziosmanpaşa ÜniversitesiFelsefe ve Din Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. MEHMET DEMİRTAŞ
- Bertrand Resusell'da din-ahlak ilişkileri
The Religion-morale relationship in Bertrand Ressell
ÖMER ÖZTÜRK
- Bertrand Russell'da ölüm ve ölümsüzlük problemi
The problem of death and immortality acording to Bertrand Russell
ELVAN AKAR
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2007
DinDokuz Eylül ÜniversitesiFelsefe ve Din Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. İBRAHİM EMİROĞLU
- Bertrand Russell'ın eğitime ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi
An analysis of Bertrand Russell's thought on education
SENANUR BALÇIN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2021
Eğitim ve ÖğretimOndokuz Mayıs ÜniversitesiEğitim Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. FERHAT AKDEMİR
- Bertrand Russell'ın klasik mantığa getirdiği eleştiriler
Bertrand Russell's critics of classical logic
GÜLİZAR BÜLBÜL
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2006
FelsefeAnkara ÜniversitesiFelsefe ve Din Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ.DR. İBRAHİM ÖZDEMİR