Geri Dön

Debt servicing capacity and the role of public investments: A case study of Turkey

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 364377
  2. Yazar: NİHAT KENTEL
  3. Danışmanlar: YRD. DOÇ. DR. DENİZ GÖKÇE
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Ekonomi, Economics
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1989
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Ekonomi Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 110

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

In this dissertation, the debt capacity of a borrowing and developing country is investigated. The typical Growth-Cum-Debt approach of Avramovic investigates the debt capacity through various stages on basic assumptions of Harrod's growth model. There are several shortcomings in such growth related debt models which are skipping various features of the development process. In this paper I aimed at incorporating some of isolated features that were kept out of the concern in Growth-Cum-Debt models, but not all of them could be considered in an analytical model describing the process in a compact fashion. That's why the critics directed towards the conventional approach are also the matters of this work. The determining differences of this paper's model can be stated such that: -The growth rate of an economy can not be given. The countries in development process can not determine their development strategies independently within an environment of scarce resources in international capital markets and political limitations that the governments of developing countries face. The logical consequence of this view is that the investment strategy is an exogenous factor, indeed. -The economy is made up of two sectors with tradable and nontradable output which are attributed to private and public sectors respectively. This is an undeniable feature of the economy which should be defined clearly, especially due to government's responsibility in the accumulation of debt stock in Turkey as in some Latin American countries. The reasoning under this seperation is the obvious difference in capital-output ratios of these sectors with a government involving in infrastructure investments and a private sector in investments with higher rate of return. The crucial point here is where to invest external resources which are highly expensive not only in the meaning of its real but also of its severe social and political costs

Benzer Tezler

  1. Dünya ekonomisindeki işbirliği çabaları ve KEİB Projesi örneği

    Cooperation initiatives in the world economy and the example of BSECR Project

    KAZIM UĞUR KIZILASLAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1996

    EkonomiAnkara Üniversitesi

    DOÇ.DR. BASKIN ORAN

  2. Dept-financed development experience of Korea:1962-1987

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    CHUL-HUM PAIK

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    1988

    EkonomiOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    PROF.DR. MERİH CELASUN

  3. Projelerin finansmanında yap-işlet-devret modeli

    The Build-Operate-Transfer approach for the financing of projects

    HANGELDI KADYROV

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2003

    İşletmeAnkara Üniversitesi

    İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı

    Y.DOÇ.DR. GÜVEN SAYILGAN

  4. Birleşmelerin hisse senedi fiyatlarına etkisi -Türkiye uygulaması-

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    FUNDA GÜREL

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1997

    BankacılıkMarmara Üniversitesi

    Bankacılık Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. VİLDAN SERİN

  5. Dış borçlanma sürecinde Türkiye

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    SELDA GENÇ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1998

    İşletmeİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. YÜCEL CANDEMİR