Debt servicing capacity and the role of public investments: A case study of Turkey
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 364377
- Danışmanlar: YRD. DOÇ. DR. DENİZ GÖKÇE
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Ekonomi, Economics
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 1989
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Ekonomi Ana Bilim Dalı
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 110
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
In this dissertation, the debt capacity of a borrowing and developing country is investigated. The typical Growth-Cum-Debt approach of Avramovic investigates the debt capacity through various stages on basic assumptions of Harrod's growth model. There are several shortcomings in such growth related debt models which are skipping various features of the development process. In this paper I aimed at incorporating some of isolated features that were kept out of the concern in Growth-Cum-Debt models, but not all of them could be considered in an analytical model describing the process in a compact fashion. That's why the critics directed towards the conventional approach are also the matters of this work. The determining differences of this paper's model can be stated such that: -The growth rate of an economy can not be given. The countries in development process can not determine their development strategies independently within an environment of scarce resources in international capital markets and political limitations that the governments of developing countries face. The logical consequence of this view is that the investment strategy is an exogenous factor, indeed. -The economy is made up of two sectors with tradable and nontradable output which are attributed to private and public sectors respectively. This is an undeniable feature of the economy which should be defined clearly, especially due to government's responsibility in the accumulation of debt stock in Turkey as in some Latin American countries. The reasoning under this seperation is the obvious difference in capital-output ratios of these sectors with a government involving in infrastructure investments and a private sector in investments with higher rate of return. The crucial point here is where to invest external resources which are highly expensive not only in the meaning of its real but also of its severe social and political costs
Benzer Tezler
- Dünya ekonomisindeki işbirliği çabaları ve KEİB Projesi örneği
Cooperation initiatives in the world economy and the example of BSECR Project
KAZIM UĞUR KIZILASLAN
- Makroekonomik veriler ile NPL tahmini: Bir Türkiye uygulaması
NPL FORECASTING WITH MACROECONOMIC DATA: THE TURKEY APPLICATION
FATİH ERDEM KARA
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2025
Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiEndüstri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ MEHMET ALİ ERGÜN
- Su ürünleri firmalarının finansal performanslarının analizi: Norveç örneği ve Türkiye için öneriler
Analysis of financial performance of aquaculture companies: The Norwegian example and recommendations for Turkiye
OSMAN KAAN ÖZDOĞAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2025
İşletmeHacettepe Üniversitesiİşletme Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. ZARİFE GÖKNUR BÜYÜKKARA
- Projelerin finansmanında yap-işlet-devret modeli
The Build-Operate-Transfer approach for the financing of projects
HANGELDI KADYROV
