Geri Dön

Evolution of needs: Enslavement or liberation Rousseau versus Marx

Rousseau ile Marx ihtiyaçların evrimi: Kölelik ya da özgürlük

  1. Tez No: 364661
  2. Yazar: E. YILDIZ SİLİER
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. GÜROL IRZIK
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Sosyoloji, Felsefe, Sociology, Philosophy
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1999
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

In this thesis I will show how Rousseau's and Marx's different views about human nature lead to different conceptions of human needs and human good that underlie their entire theories. This comparison involves an investigation of Rousseau's notion of“corruption”and Marx's conception of“alienation”that are the central tenets in their critiques of civilization. Although both of these thinkers criticize civilization due to its negative impacts on individuals, they analyze the source and the solution of this problem differently. The difference between Rousseau and Marx can be expressed in the language of needs as follows: for Rousseau, the historical evolution of“perceived needs”diverges from ''true needs“ because of the ”false consciousness“ of one's needs that is reinforced by civilization. In other words, the subjective needs of an individual increase beyond the objective needs that are often not consciously known by him. By contrast, Marx's conception of needs implies that the evolution of perceived needs can converge to ”humane needs“ under particular socio-economic conditions. Their different evaluations of the historical evolution of needs also reflect in their notions of human good. Whereas Rousseau's ideal is a ”man of few needs“ who is happy since he can satisfy all his needs, Marx favors ”man rich in his needs“ who can develop his various capacities and thereby realize himself. Finally, I will show that Rousseau's understanding of human good as ”happiness“ and Marx's notion of ”self-realization“ are based on their conceptions of human nature as ”self-sufficient“ and ”sociable" respectively.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Milletlerarası özel hukukta iflâs

    Insolvency in private international law

    OĞUZ DORKEN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. BERK DEMİRKOL

  2. Isıtma araçlarının gelişimi ve elektrikli bir ısıtma aracının belirli gereksinimlere göre tasarlanması

    Evolution of heaters and designing a heating device for specific needs

    HÜLYA ALTUĞ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1994

    Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    PROF.DR. NİHAT TOYDEMİR

  3. Evolution of spatial organization of daily retailing in urban areas: The case of Ankara

    Kentsel alanlarda günlük perakende ticaretin mekansal evrimi: Ankara örneği

    GÜLSEN YILMAZ

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2002

    Şehircilik ve Bölge PlanlamaOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ.DR. MURAT GÜVENÇ

  4. The evolution of Iran`s foreign policy rationale: 1979 - 2015

    İranın dış politika mantığının evrimi: 1979 - 2015

    AYDIN KHAJEİ

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2017

    Uluslararası İlişkilerAtılım Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. HASAN ÜNAL