The missing link in the history of Islamic legal theory: The development of Uṣūl al-Fiqh between al-Shāfi'ī and al-Jaṣṣāṣ during the 3rd/9th and early 4th/10th centuries
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 401617
- Danışmanlar: PROF. AHMAD ATIF AHMAD
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Hukuk, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2014
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: University of California Santa Barbara
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 329
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
The 3rd/9th and 4th/10th centuries witnessed significant developments in Islamic intellectual history. Most of the ḥadīth collections that later came to be recognized as canonical were compiled in this period and the major schools of law and certain theological schools also completed their formation during the same period. Despite this continuous progress in other fields of religious sciences, there is an unusual lapse of time between what is widely considered the first work in uṣūl al-fiqh (Islamic legal theory) al-Risāla by al-Shāfi'ī (204/819), and what is recognized as the second work al-Fuṣūl fī-al-uṣūl by al-Jaṣṣāṣ (370/981). Due to the absence of a major work devoted solely to uṣūl al-fiqh from this period, the majority of contemporary scholars considered it as a period of history during which there was little or no intellectual activity in the field of uṣūl al-fiqh and where no significant developments took place. This assumption has driven some scholars to assign a new starting point for the field of uṣūl al-fiqh and even different definitions of uṣūl al-fiqh. The question of what in fact took place during this 'dark period,' however, has not been fully or adequately explored. This dissertation attempts to provide an answer to this question and to shed light on the development of uṣūl al-fiqh during this period. It argues that the ostensible 'gap' (or absence of scholarly production) between the years (204/819) and (370/981) in the field of uṣūl al-fiqh (Islamic legal theory) is in fact illusory. The years mentioned here are the death year of al-Shāfi'ī, the author of al-Risāla, often reckoned to be the first treatise in uṣūl al-fiqh and the death year of al-Jaṣṣāṣ (370/981), the author al-Fuṣūl fī-al-uṣūl, the next independent treatise in the field. The presence of a gap may be defended only if understood in the sense of the absence of an independent extant work in the category of uṣūl al-fiqh. Based upon the results of this examination of extensive documentation, this dissertation argues that the 'gap' period, rather than a one in which no important developments took place, should instead be viewed by scholars as a“period of independent productivity,”where the scholars of the time contributed to the topics of uṣūl al-fiqh without a strict school affiliation. I trace the lineage of the debates found in al-Fuṣūl fī-al-uṣūl by al-Jaṣṣāṣ (370/981) to earlier works and debates within the century and a half in question to earlier sources. Three sets of sources were examined in this research. The first set consists of a number of manuscripts that have either being ignored by modern scholars or been under-studied as works relevant to the history of usul al-fiqh. The second set of sources are works in various fields of the religious sciences, including but not limited to works on fiqh, kalām, ḥadīth, and tafsir, which contain scattered information relevant to the study of uṣūl al-fiqh. The third set of sources consists of citations from the scholars of the 'gap' period found in the later literature of uṣūl al-fiqh as well as biobibliographical sources. I have restricted the topics presented in this dissertation to the discussions of the primary sources of Islamic law due to the predominance of these issues in the documentation examined. The dissertation therefore consists of four chapters. The first chapter deals with the evolution of the concept of uṣūl to uṣūl al-fiqh. I examine the topics that were included within that rubric by first tracing the transformations of the term during the gap period and then by comparing al-Shāfi'ī's al-Risāla and al-Jaṣṣāṣ's al-Fuṣūl. The subsequent three chapters examine the discussions of the period over the use of khabar al-wāḥid (solitary report), ijmā' (consensus), and qiyās (analogy) as sources of authority for Islamic law. I chose these three issues because the legal theoretical discussions intensified around these topics during this period, and they later came to be considered among“the fundamental sources of Islamic law.”The dissertation makes significant new claims about the early development, function, and definition of uṣūl al-fiqh in the period between al-Shāfi'ī and al-Jaṣṣāṣ that contradict commonly held opinions. It will therefore be of interest to scholars researching the early history of Islamic law and legal theory, but also to the broader audience who are interested in the authority problem in Islam and the discussions related to orthodoxy and orthopraxy.
Benzer Tezler
- Fıkıh usûlü tarihinde kayıp halka: Hicri III. ve IV. asırlarda usûlî görüşler
The missing link in uşul al-fiqh history: Opinions about usul in 3rd and 4th centuries of the hegira
ABDULBASIT SALTEKİN
- Diş hekimlerinin implant çevresi hastalıklarla ilgili tanı ve tedavi yaklaşımları
Diagnosis and treatment approaches of dentists regarding peri-implant diseases
NİL BATUR
Diş Hekimliği Uzmanlık
Türkçe
2022
Diş HekimliğiEge ÜniversitesiPeriodontoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. HATİCE OYA TÜRKOĞLU
- Firmalar için insan kaynakları katkı modeli oluşturulması ve insan kaynakları yönetimi ile firma performansı ilişkisinin analazi
Human resources contribution model and analysis of the link between human resources management and firm performance
ZAFER AĞDELEN
Doktora
Türkçe
2003
Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiEndüstri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. MEHMET HALUK ERKUT
- Descartes comme héritier d'Aristote dans le contexte des preuves de Dieu
Tanrı ispatları bağlamında Aristoteles'in mirasçısı olarak Descartes
İHSAN HAYRİ BATUR
Doktora
Fransızca
2023
FelsefeGalatasaray ÜniversitesiFelsefe Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. SELAMİ ATAKAN ALTINÖRS
- Morphology in design: Utilization and (Re)production of morphological knowledge through urban design competitions
Tasarımda morfoloji: Kentsel tasarım yarışmaları aracılığıyla morfolojik bilginin kullanımı ve (yeniden) üretimi
SELEN DEMİREZEN
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2023
Şehircilik ve Bölge PlanlamaOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiŞehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. OLGU ÇALIŞKAN