Conditions supporting the development of scientific argumentation in high school chemistry classrooms: The role of question prompts and an interactive simulation
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 402017
- Danışmanlar: PROF. MARTINA NIESWANDT, PROF. FLORENCE R. SULLIVAN
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Eğitim ve Öğretim, Kimya, Education and Training, Chemistry
- Anahtar Kelimeler: scientific argumentation, interactive simulations, gas properties and behaviors
- Yıl: 2015
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: University of Massachusetts Amherst
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 251
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
The purpose of this case study was to provide benefit to preservice and inservice science teachers, who have an interest in applying scientific argumentation in their high school chemistry instructions, by investigating role of question prompts and an interactive simulation supporting the development of scientific argumentation. In particular, the study examined the quality of students' arguments changing over time in scientific argumentation when they constructed and defended their arguments using the“Gas Properties”computer simulation. For this purpose, forty-seven11th grade students from four classes first worked in pairs and then, all the pairs returned the classroom for discussion. One pair was selected as a focal group by their chemistry teachers within each class resulting in a total of four focal groups. The chemistry teachers posed the driving question of Part I to familiarize students with scientific argumentation while exploring the effect of gravity on the behavior of air molecules in space. Then, the teachers challenged the students with the driving question of Part II to help students construct and defend more elaborate scientific arguments while comparing the behaviors of air and Helium molecules in space. I examined what type of arguments participants found convincing and also searched which conditions (i.e. challenged by the driving question, counter-arguments, peer question or self-questions, or prompted by representation of investigation, teacher questions, or similar arguments) helped students to improve their arguments in scientific argumentation. The results depicted that in pair discussions, argumentation was a way of participants' collectively supporting a scientific claim based on evidence from the interactive simulation and trying to agree on conclusions drawn from this evidence. Though, only two focal groups generated the highest quality of arguments with the waxing and waning amount of consensus over time from Part I to Part II. On the other hand, in classroom discussions focal groups tried to win their opponents over to their points of view and to weaken opposing views with making their evidence visible on the interactive simulation, which led four focal groups to produce the highest quality of arguments from Part I to Part II.
Benzer Tezler
- İ.T.Ü. Fakültelerinin araştırma etkinlikleri sekreterliğinden yararlanma etkinliklerinin veri zarflama analizi ile belirlenmesi
Determining the relative efficiencies of the faculties of İstanbul Technical University in their relationships with the research activities secretary
SİNAN SÖL
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1997
Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiEndüstri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. FÜSUN ÜLENGİN
- Yeraltı madencilik sektörü mesleki güvenlik risk analizi
Occupational safety risk analysis in underground mining sector
FATMA YAŞLI
Doktora
Türkçe
2020
Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesiİşletme Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. HÜR BERSAM BOLAT
- Türkiye'de son dönem cami tasarımında merkezi kubbeli mekân kurgusunun incelenmesi
Analysis of the central domed space design scheme in the recent Turkish mosque architecture
ABDULLAH GEDİL
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2019
Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiBina Bilgisi Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. YASEMİN ALKIŞER BREGGER
- Trüf ağaçlandırma alanlarının öncelik sırasının belirlenmesi: Bartın ili örneği
Determınıng the prıorıty order of truffle plantatıon areas: Bartın provınce example
MEHMET SAİT ÇETİN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2021
Ormancılık ve Orman MühendisliğiBartın ÜniversitesiOrman Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. ERSİN GÜNGÖR
- Zemine gömülü borulara etkileyen yükler
The Loads acting on buried pipes into the soil
GÖKHAN DEĞİRMENCİ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1997
İnşaat Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesiİnşaat Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. AHMET SAĞLAMER