Who decides the arbitrator's jurisdiction in international commercial arbitration: The competencecompetence doctrine from a transnational perspective
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 402412
- Danışmanlar: DR. TONY COLE
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Hukuk, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Law, International Relations
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2015
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Brunel University London
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 73
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
The contractual character of international arbitration raises questions regarding jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal. Although arbitration is a consensual process, the issue of who decides the arbitrator's jurisdiction is problematic because the arbitral proceedings cannot be deemed as being entirely separate from the court in the seat of the arbitration. As leading conventions, the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention provides multinational parties with a dispute resolution mechanism that enables them to have their disputes resolved by a neutral adjudication in order not to be affected by diminutions of national courts and to have easily enforceable judgments. To understand the authorization of arbitrators, the competence-competence doctrine must be scrutinized. Whereas the positive effect of the doctrine is widely recognized, the Model Law and the NYC are not clear on the negative effect, and different countries adopt different approaches regarding the negative effect of the competencecompetence doctrine, which is concerned with who decides the arbitrator's jurisdiction when a party objects to the validity or scope of the arbitration agreement. Some apply the prima facie approach, which places greater value on the parties' interest for the purpose of preventing dilatory tactics and providing cost-efficiency. Others take a more interventionist and presumptive approach, which seeks to affirm the parties' intention at all stages in order to minimize the risk that parties who never agreed to arbitration are forced to participate. This dissertation offers a comparative analysis of jurisdictional approaches to granting priority to the arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction.
Benzer Tezler
- Milletlerarası ticari tahkimde grup şirketler doktrini çerçevesinde tahkim anlaşmasının üçüncü kişilere teşmili
Extension of arbitration agreements to third parties pursuant to group of companies doctrine in international commercial arbitration
HANDE BİNGÖL
- Libya mevzuatına göre petrol ihtilafında uluslararası tahkim: uluslararası statü mevzuatı ve Libya'daki tahkim arasında karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme
International arbitration in oil disputes with reference to libyan legislation a comparative study between international status legislation and arbitration in Libya
WALEID AYID ALSAKEK
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2019
Uluslararası İlişkilerİstanbul Yeni Yüzyıl ÜniversitesiSiyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. MEHMET BARDAKÇI
- Şirket içi tahkimde kendine özgü paralel yargılanma problemi ve olası çözümleri
Sui generis parallel proceedings problem in intracorporate arbitration and possible solutions
ALİ GÖKTUĞ İPEK
- Uluslararası tahkimde üçüncü taraf finansmanı
Third party finance in international arbitration
KENAN YILMAZ
