Geri Dön

Who decides the arbitrator's jurisdiction in international commercial arbitration: The competencecompetence doctrine from a transnational perspective

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 402412
  2. Yazar: LÜTFİ GÖKTAŞ
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. TONY COLE
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Hukuk, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Law, International Relations
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2015
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Brunel University London
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 73

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

The contractual character of international arbitration raises questions regarding jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal. Although arbitration is a consensual process, the issue of who decides the arbitrator's jurisdiction is problematic because the arbitral proceedings cannot be deemed as being entirely separate from the court in the seat of the arbitration. As leading conventions, the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention provides multinational parties with a dispute resolution mechanism that enables them to have their disputes resolved by a neutral adjudication in order not to be affected by diminutions of national courts and to have easily enforceable judgments. To understand the authorization of arbitrators, the competence-competence doctrine must be scrutinized. Whereas the positive effect of the doctrine is widely recognized, the Model Law and the NYC are not clear on the negative effect, and different countries adopt different approaches regarding the negative effect of the competencecompetence doctrine, which is concerned with who decides the arbitrator's jurisdiction when a party objects to the validity or scope of the arbitration agreement. Some apply the prima facie approach, which places greater value on the parties' interest for the purpose of preventing dilatory tactics and providing cost-efficiency. Others take a more interventionist and presumptive approach, which seeks to affirm the parties' intention at all stages in order to minimize the risk that parties who never agreed to arbitration are forced to participate. This dissertation offers a comparative analysis of jurisdictional approaches to granting priority to the arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Milletlerarası ticari tahkimde grup şirketler doktrini çerçevesinde tahkim anlaşmasının üçüncü kişilere teşmili

    Extension of arbitration agreements to third parties pursuant to group of companies doctrine in international commercial arbitration

    HANDE BİNGÖL

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2023

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. BERK DEMİRKOL

  2. Libya mevzuatına göre petrol ihtilafında uluslararası tahkim: uluslararası statü mevzuatı ve Libya'daki tahkim arasında karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme

    International arbitration in oil disputes with reference to libyan legislation a comparative study between international status legislation and arbitration in Libya

    WALEID AYID ALSAKEK

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    Uluslararası İlişkilerİstanbul Yeni Yüzyıl Üniversitesi

    Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. MEHMET BARDAKÇI

  3. Gemilerin ihtiyati haczi

    Arrest of ships

    ONUR YILMAZ

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2023

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. HAKAN PEKCANITEZ

  4. Şirket içi tahkimde kendine özgü paralel yargılanma problemi ve olası çözümleri

    Sui generis parallel proceedings problem in intracorporate arbitration and possible solutions

    ALİ GÖKTUĞ İPEK

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2019

    HukukUniversiteit Leiden

    DR. DáNİEL DóZSA

  5. Uluslararası tahkimde üçüncü taraf finansmanı

    Third party finance in international arbitration

    KENAN YILMAZ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2022

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. İLHAN YILMAZ