Geri Dön

Az şubeli ve çok şubeli bankalar arasında verimlilik karşılaştırması

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 41029
  2. Yazar: DENİZ PATAT
  3. Danışmanlar: DOÇ.DR. HASAN KAVAL
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Bankacılık, Banking
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1994
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Gazi Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 127

Özet

SUMMARY In this thesis, it was aimed by empirical studies to steer the argument arising from the productivity of fewer-branch and multi-branch banks towards the result. In the light of the said objective, the fewer- branch banks and multi-branch banks were separated conceptually from one another in priority. The subjects of income-expense structures and the measurement of the work volume which are necessary to compare the banks with each other were included as well. The concept of the productivity which constitutes the backbone of the subject was examined and it was divided into two main sections. These sections are profitability and productivity. Tables were used in order to examine these subjects better. Rate of Return Table and Analysis of Gross Income Margin Table were examined for profitability and Analysis of Service Costs Table for productivity. The collective results of the selected fewer-branch and multi-branch banks and the collective results of all banks (namely income tables, balance seheets, income-expense margins) were taken up and they were adapted to these three tables. In order to prevent the deviations and get correct result they were examined for three years (1991-1992-1993) and comparisons were made with bank groups. As a result of such comparisons, a general growth is observed in productivity with regard to years. While the 111bank groups are examined, it is observed that banks with fewer branches operate more productively compared with multi-branch banks and banks in general. When the reason for such productivity is examined, two important reasons can be noticed. The first is the employment of the personnel more efficiently and the other is benefiting from the capital leverage more in the banks with fewer branches. IV

Özet (Çeviri)

SUMMARY In this thesis, it was aimed by empirical studies to steer the argument arising from the productivity of fewer-branch and multi-branch banks towards the result. In the light of the said objective, the fewer- branch banks and multi-branch banks were separated conceptually from one another in priority. The subjects of income-expense structures and the measurement of the work volume which are necessary to compare the banks with each other were included as well. The concept of the productivity which constitutes the backbone of the subject was examined and it was divided into two main sections. These sections are profitability and productivity. Tables were used in order to examine these subjects better. Rate of Return Table and Analysis of Gross Income Margin Table were examined for profitability and Analysis of Service Costs Table for productivity. The collective results of the selected fewer-branch and multi-branch banks and the collective results of all banks (namely income tables, balance seheets, income-expense margins) were taken up and they were adapted to these three tables. In order to prevent the deviations and get correct result they were examined for three years (1991-1992-1993) and comparisons were made with bank groups. As a result of such comparisons, a general growth is observed in productivity with regard to years. While the 111bank groups are examined, it is observed that banks with fewer branches operate more productively compared with multi-branch banks and banks in general. When the reason for such productivity is examined, two important reasons can be noticed. The first is the employment of the personnel more efficiently and the other is benefiting from the capital leverage more in the banks with fewer branches. IV

Benzer Tezler

  1. Gestion de performance avec DEA en utilisant les extensions de controle des poids, d'efficacite croisee et d'analyse de fenetre

    Ağırlık kısıtlamaları, çapraz etkinlik ve pencere analizi yöntemleri kullanılarak veri zarflama analizi ile performans yönetimi

    FİRÜZAN İŞCAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Fransızca

    Fransızca

    1999

    Endüstri ve Endüstri MühendisliğiGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Endüstri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. E. ERTUĞRUL KARSAK

  2. Türkiye'de kalkınma ve yatırım bankacılığı

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    NURGÜL KAYABAŞ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1989

    BankacılıkMarmara Üniversitesi

    PROF.DR. OKTAY GÜVEMLİ

  3. Merkezkaç yönetim-kamu bankalarında merkezkaç yönetim uygulanması araştırmasına bir örnek T.Emlak Bankası A.Ş.

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    İDRİS ÇEVİK

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1990

    İşletmeİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Organizasyon ve İşletme Politikaları Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. HAYRİ ÜLGEN

  4. Türkiye'de 500 büyük firmada döviz kuru riski yönetimine ilişkin bir saha araştırması

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    OSMAN KARAMUSTAFA

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1995

    İşletmeİstanbul Üniversitesi

    DOÇ.DR. BELKIS SEVAL

  5. Türk ekonomisinde banka yapısının değişimi 1980-1986

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    ERCAN ERKUL

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1988

    EkonomiAnkara Üniversitesi

    İktisat Ana Bilim Dalı