Geri Dön

F. H. Bradley metafiziği

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 41540
  2. Yazar: EMEL KOÇ
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. KENAN GÜRSOY
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Felsefe, Philosophy
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1995
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 216

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

The latest, and perhaps we may venture to say the most important, statement of Absolute Idealism in English philosophy is that of F.H. Bradley who, in his Appearance and Reality (1893) offers an interpretation of the theory which differs materially from that of his predecessors. Bradley defined metaphysics, as“the study of first principles or ultimate truths, or again the effort to comprehend the universe, not simply piecemeal or by fragments, but somehow as a whole”. As Berkeley claimed that“to be is to be perceived”, so Bradley insisted that“anything in no sense felt or experienced, become to me quite meaning.”Bradley approaches his task armed with a chief principle of whose validity he is completely convinced. Thinking, he says, means the acceptance of a certain standart, and that standart, in any case, is an assumption as to the character of reality. Ultimate Reality, he says, is such that it does not contradict itself, here is an absolute criterion. He, then, proceeds to apply this“absolute criterion”in its negative form to our various ordinary ideas about the world, that is, our various ways of regarding reality, and finds that it proves them all to be self-contradictory and, therefore, not real, but only“appearance”. Such ideas include those of qualities and relations, space and time, primary and secondary qualities, substance, self, cause, change, motion and nature. Though Bradley argues that all these ideas, because inconsistent and unintelligible, can only give us appearance and not reality, he emphasises that these appearances certainly exist. Nothing, he stresses, is actually removed from existence by being labelled“appearance”. It is clear from this that Bradley does not mean by calling anything, for example time, space, relations, etc.,“unreal”that it does not exist. He uses“real”in an abnormal way to mean what is rational, self-consistent, coherent, harmonious and all- inclusive. Anything which fall shorts of this is“unreal”and mere appearance.205 Appearance is only intelligible as an appearance of the Real. To think of some thing as merely an appearance is to think of it as ultimately adjectival : and the adjective implies a substantive. If there were no reality, there could be no appearance. All appearances have degrees of reality; but some are more real than others. Appearance cannot be reality, but, since appearances certainly exist, they must be related in some way to the real. Reality is present among its appearances in different degrees and with different values. Bradley insists that Reality, or Absolute,-is nothing apart from appearances; it "appears in its appearances and they are its revelation. How this harmonising and transforming of discrepant elements takes place, Bradley confesses he does not know, but insists that it is possible and necessary and therefore is so. We cannot understand how in the Absolute a rich harmony embraces every special discord. But, on the other hand, we may be sure that this result is reached. We do not know how all these partial unites come together in the absolute, but we may be sure that the content of not one is obliterated. Reality, as well as being rational, coherent, all-inclusive, harmonious, non- contradictory and containing all its appearances, must be supra-relational, and therefore, one. Knowledge of this Reality-this Absolute, as Mr. Bradley delights to call it-we can never obtain, for to know the Absolute at once implies that distinction between knower and known which cannot belong to the real. To know the Absolute I should have to be the Absolute. And even then I could not know myself, for even in self knowledge a relation breaks out again-the fatal Dualism which we want to get rid of; the distinction between knower and known, between part and Whole, which implies a relation between them. This thesis-that Reality cannot be fully known or thought-is defended by an elaborate attempt to show that all the categories of our thought imply incoherences or contradictions, inconsistencies which we cannot suppose to belong to Reality.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Josiah Royce'un metafiziği

    Josi̇ah Royce's metaphysi̇cs

    BAHTİNUR MÖNGÜ

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2014

    FelsefeAtatürk Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. MUSTAFA YILDIRIM

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. ÖNDER BİLGİN

  2. A quantitative sociolinguistic study of lexical variation in Turkish

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    MEHMET ÇELİK

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    1995

    DilbilimLa Trobe University

    DR. DAVID BRADLEY

  3. Anyonik reaktiflerin sepiyolit tarafından adsorplanma mekanizması

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    MUSTAFA ÇINAR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1998

    Maden Mühendisliği ve Madencilikİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Maden Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. MEHMET SABRİ ÇELİK

  4. Serum albumin ve globulin franksiyonlarındaki lipoproteinlere bağlı kolesterol düzeylerinin belirtimi

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    F. H. TUBA ARABACIOĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1989

    Biyokimyaİstanbul Üniversitesi

    PROF.DR. NEVZAT BABAN

  5. 27 numaralı Ayntâb Şer'îyye Sicilinin transkripsiyonu ve değerlendirilmesi (H.1076-1077/M.1666-1667)

    The transcription and evaluation of Ayntab Sheria Record/Registry numbered 27 (H.1076-1077/AD.1666-1667)

    BÜŞRA CANPOLAT

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    TarihGaziantep Üniversitesi

    Tarih Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ MURAT ÇELİKDEMİR