Geri Dön

Asansör sistemlerinin trafik analizi dizaynı ve simülasyonu

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 55585
  2. Yazar: CEVAT ERDEM İMRAK
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. HAMİT ÖZTEPE
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Makine Mühendisliği, Mechanical Engineering
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1996
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 109

Özet

Neural networks are usually used for pattern recognition and prediction. It is proposed here that they are used for passenger rate prediction in lifts. It is thus necessary to gather enough data to be used for training. The simulation program is executed on a pseudo building with 9 floors excluding the main terminal. Three cars with various contact capacity are used to service the whole building. In this program interfloor distance, contract speed, time for opening and closing the doors, passenger transfer time are chosen by users. The program runs on a 486PC with 8 MB RAM, 256MB hard disk configuration. It is run for different building configurations with maximum 9 floors and 3 cars. This limitation depends on computer's configuration and software limits as it is shown in SO and et.al. They used their simulation program on 25 floor building with four cars and it has taken 35 hours to train up neural network by using the 6000 records. It is shown how simulation can be used to predict lift system behavior, and a large number of simulation runs are carried out, tabulated and plotted. The ratio between the passenger arrival rate and the handling capacity of the lift system is suggested as a measure of system loading. As a result, average waiting time, round trip time, and interval graphics are obtained by using a simulation program. The possible use of control theory in lift systems is outlined in detail. XIX

Özet (Çeviri)

1. Classification: An input pattern is passed to the network and the network produces a representative class as output. 2. Pattern matching : an input pattern is passed to the network and the network produces the corresponding output pattern. 3. Pattern completion: an incomplete pattern is passed to the network and the network produces an output pattern that has the missing portions on the input pattern filled in. 4. Noise removal: a noise-corrupted input pattern is presented to the network and the network removes some or all of the noise and produces a cleaner version of the input pattern as output. 5. Optimization: An input pattern representing the initial values for a specific optimization problem is presented to the network and the network produces a set of variables that represent a solution to the problem. 6. Control: An input pattern represents the current state of a controller and the desired response for the controller and the output is the proper command sequence that will create the desired response. In this context, it is important to point out that, when using the term Lift Traffic Design, the word design pertains to the selection of lift configuration and not to the mechanical or electrical aspects of the lift system. Whenever the term Average Waiting Time (AWT) is mentioned, it always means Passenger Average Waiting Time, which is the average of all the waiting times that the passenger have to wait, until they board the car. Although that is sometimes used synonymously with System Response Time (SRT) there is a difference. The term Round Trip Time (RTT) is the average period of time for a single elevator car trip around a building, usually during up-peak traffic conditions, measured from the time the car doors open at the main terminal, until the car doors reopen at the main terminal, when the car returns to the main terminal, after its trip around the building. The Interval (INT) is defined as the time between the arrivals of cars at the main terminal. The symbol S is the average number of stop made by the lift in one journey, and H is the average highest reversal floor. The term Handling Capacity (HC) when used, relates to the Lift System Handling Capacity, and is defined as the percentage of the building population served in five minutes. This work is an exploration in the possibilities of the various fields in which neural networks can be applied in lift control. Neural networks are usually applied in problems where no set of clear and decisive rules exist, and where the nature of the problem requires intuitive reasoning, like pattern recognition problems. winNeural networks are usually used for pattern recognition and prediction. It is proposed here that they are used for passenger rate prediction in lifts. It is thus necessary to gather enough data to be used for training. The simulation program is executed on a pseudo building with 9 floors excluding the main terminal. Three cars with various contact capacity are used to service the whole building. In this program interfloor distance, contract speed, time for opening and closing the doors, passenger transfer time are chosen by users. The program runs on a 486PC with 8 MB RAM, 256MB hard disk configuration. It is run for different building configurations with maximum 9 floors and 3 cars. This limitation depends on computer's configuration and software limits as it is shown in SO and et.al. They used their simulation program on 25 floor building with four cars and it has taken 35 hours to train up neural network by using the 6000 records. It is shown how simulation can be used to predict lift system behavior, and a large number of simulation runs are carried out, tabulated and plotted. The ratio between the passenger arrival rate and the handling capacity of the lift system is suggested as a measure of system loading. As a result, average waiting time, round trip time, and interval graphics are obtained by using a simulation program. The possible use of control theory in lift systems is outlined in detail. XIX1. Classification: An input pattern is passed to the network and the network produces a representative class as output. 2. Pattern matching : an input pattern is passed to the network and the network produces the corresponding output pattern. 3. Pattern completion: an incomplete pattern is passed to the network and the network produces an output pattern that has the missing portions on the input pattern filled in. 4. Noise removal: a noise-corrupted input pattern is presented to the network and the network removes some or all of the noise and produces a cleaner version of the input pattern as output. 5. Optimization: An input pattern representing the initial values for a specific optimization problem is presented to the network and the network produces a set of variables that represent a solution to the problem. 6. Control: An input pattern represents the current state of a controller and the desired response for the controller and the output is the proper command sequence that will create the desired response. In this context, it is important to point out that, when using the term Lift Traffic Design, the word design pertains to the selection of lift configuration and not to the mechanical or electrical aspects of the lift system. Whenever the term Average Waiting Time (AWT) is mentioned, it always means Passenger Average Waiting Time, which is the average of all the waiting times that the passenger have to wait, until they board the car. Although that is sometimes used synonymously with System Response Time (SRT) there is a difference. The term Round Trip Time (RTT) is the average period of time for a single elevator car trip around a building, usually during up-peak traffic conditions, measured from the time the car doors open at the main terminal, until the car doors reopen at the main terminal, when the car returns to the main terminal, after its trip around the building. The Interval (INT) is defined as the time between the arrivals of cars at the main terminal. The symbol S is the average number of stop made by the lift in one journey, and H is the average highest reversal floor. The term Handling Capacity (HC) when used, relates to the Lift System Handling Capacity, and is defined as the percentage of the building population served in five minutes. This work is an exploration in the possibilities of the various fields in which neural networks can be applied in lift control. Neural networks are usually applied in problems where no set of clear and decisive rules exist, and where the nature of the problem requires intuitive reasoning, like pattern recognition problems. winNeural networks are usually used for pattern recognition and prediction. It is proposed here that they are used for passenger rate prediction in lifts. It is thus necessary to gather enough data to be used for training. The simulation program is executed on a pseudo building with 9 floors excluding the main terminal. Three cars with various contact capacity are used to service the whole building. In this program interfloor distance, contract speed, time for opening and closing the doors, passenger transfer time are chosen by users. The program runs on a 486PC with 8 MB RAM, 256MB hard disk configuration. It is run for different building configurations with maximum 9 floors and 3 cars. This limitation depends on computer's configuration and software limits as it is shown in SO and et.al. They used their simulation program on 25 floor building with four cars and it has taken 35 hours to train up neural network by using the 6000 records. It is shown how simulation can be used to predict lift system behavior, and a large number of simulation runs are carried out, tabulated and plotted. The ratio between the passenger arrival rate and the handling capacity of the lift system is suggested as a measure of system loading. As a result, average waiting time, round trip time, and interval graphics are obtained by using a simulation program. The possible use of control theory in lift systems is outlined in detail. XIX1. Classification: An input pattern is passed to the network and the network produces a representative class as output. 2. Pattern matching : an input pattern is passed to the network and the network produces the corresponding output pattern. 3. Pattern completion: an incomplete pattern is passed to the network and the network produces an output pattern that has the missing portions on the input pattern filled in. 4. Noise removal: a noise-corrupted input pattern is presented to the network and the network removes some or all of the noise and produces a cleaner version of the input pattern as output. 5. Optimization: An input pattern representing the initial values for a specific optimization problem is presented to the network and the network produces a set of variables that represent a solution to the problem. 6. Control: An input pattern represents the current state of a controller and the desired response for the controller and the output is the proper command sequence that will create the desired response. In this context, it is important to point out that, when using the term Lift Traffic Design, the word design pertains to the selection of lift configuration and not to the mechanical or electrical aspects of the lift system. Whenever the term Average Waiting Time (AWT) is mentioned, it always means Passenger Average Waiting Time, which is the average of all the waiting times that the passenger have to wait, until they board the car. Although that is sometimes used synonymously with System Response Time (SRT) there is a difference. The term Round Trip Time (RTT) is the average period of time for a single elevator car trip around a building, usually during up-peak traffic conditions, measured from the time the car doors open at the main terminal, until the car doors reopen at the main terminal, when the car returns to the main terminal, after its trip around the building. The Interval (INT) is defined as the time between the arrivals of cars at the main terminal. The symbol S is the average number of stop made by the lift in one journey, and H is the average highest reversal floor. The term Handling Capacity (HC) when used, relates to the Lift System Handling Capacity, and is defined as the percentage of the building population served in five minutes. This work is an exploration in the possibilities of the various fields in which neural networks can be applied in lift control. Neural networks are usually applied in problems where no set of clear and decisive rules exist, and where the nature of the problem requires intuitive reasoning, like pattern recognition problems. winNeural networks are usually used for pattern recognition and prediction. It is proposed here that they are used for passenger rate prediction in lifts. It is thus necessary to gather enough data to be used for training. The simulation program is executed on a pseudo building with 9 floors excluding the main terminal. Three cars with various contact capacity are used to service the whole building. In this program interfloor distance, contract speed, time for opening and closing the doors, passenger transfer time are chosen by users. The program runs on a 486PC with 8 MB RAM, 256MB hard disk configuration. It is run for different building configurations with maximum 9 floors and 3 cars. This limitation depends on computer's configuration and software limits as it is shown in SO and et.al. They used their simulation program on 25 floor building with four cars and it has taken 35 hours to train up neural network by using the 6000 records. It is shown how simulation can be used to predict lift system behavior, and a large number of simulation runs are carried out, tabulated and plotted. The ratio between the passenger arrival rate and the handling capacity of the lift system is suggested as a measure of system loading. As a result, average waiting time, round trip time, and interval graphics are obtained by using a simulation program. The possible use of control theory in lift systems is outlined in detail. XIX

Benzer Tezler

  1. Asansör kontrol sistemlerinin genetik algoritma ile simülasyon

    The Simulation of lift control system with genetic algorithms

    BERNA BOLAT

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2006

    Makine MühendisliğiYıldız Teknik Üniversitesi

    Makine Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. MUSTAFA ALIŞVERİŞÇİ

    DOÇ. DR. ERDEM İMRAK

  2. Product design assembly application, traffic design and simulation on double deck elevator systems

    Çift katlı asansörlerin montaja ve imalata uygun tasarım uygulaması, trafik analizi ve simülasyonu

    MURAT KOCAMAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2012

    Makine Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Makine Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. CEVAT ERDEM İMRAK

  3. Yoğun kullanımlı yapılarda asansör trafiğinin kullanıcı odaklı değerlendirilmesinde dinamik simülasyon programlarının kullanımı; Gazi Üniversitesi Hastanesi örneği

    Use of dynamic simulation programs in user-oriented evaluation of elevator traffic in high density buildings; sample of Gazi University Hospital

    DOSTCAN DELİGÖZ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    MimarlıkÇankaya Üniversitesi

    Mimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. TİMUÇİN HARPUTLUGİL

  4. A decision support model for elevator system design in tall buildings

    Yüksek binalarda asansör sistemi tasarımı için karar destek modeli

    AYŞE ÇOLAKOĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2015

    Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Bilişim Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. GÜLEN ÇAĞDAŞ

  5. Yeni Cami'nin akustik açıdan performans değerlendirmesi

    Evaluation of the acoustical performance of the New Mosque

    EVREN YILDIRIM

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2003

    Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Mimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. SEVTAP YILMAZ DEMİRKALE