Geri Dön

Giriş kali,te kontrolunda kullanılan kabul örneklemeleri ve bir işletmede uygulanması

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 55619
  2. Yazar: ONUR TOPGÜL
  3. Danışmanlar: DOÇ.DR. COŞKUN ÖZKAN
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliği, Industrial and Industrial Engineering
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1996
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 124

Özet

ÖZET Bir malı, malzemeyi veya hammadeyi kullanacak kişiler ile bunu üretenler karşı karşıya geldiğinde uygulanan kalite kontrolü Giriş Kalite Kontrolü veya muayenesi olarak adlandırılır. Seri üretime dayanan büyük miktarlarda malların, belirli zaman aralıklarına göre, partiler halinde teslimi söz konusu olduğu zaman, malzemelerin istenilen standatlara uygun olup olmadıklarına, saptanan spesifikasyonu karşılayıp karşılamadığına bakılarak parti hakkında kabul veya red karan verilir. Bu karar, belirli standartlara göre üretilen malların oluşturduğu partinin muayenesine dayanır ki, burada kullanılan örnekleme muayenesidir. Kabul örneklemelerinin, kabul veya red karan verilmesi için dayanılan örnek sayısı bakımından; - Birli Kabul Örneklemeleri, - Çift Kabul Örneklemeleri, - Ardışık - İkili Kabul Örneklemeleri, olmak üzere üç türü vardır. Kalite kusurlu oranına dayanılarak belirtilirse ve her parti, bir tek örneğin muayenesine göre kabul veya red edilirse, buna kusurlu oranına dayanan birli kabul örneklemesi denir. Birli kabul örneklemesi, parti büyüklüğü N, örnek büyüklüğü n ve kabul için örnekte çıkmasına izin verilecek en yüksek kusurlu sayısı c olmak üzere üç faktöre göre belirlenir ve karar her zaman tek bir örnekle verilir. Çift örnekleme planlarında, partiyi red veya kabul karan partiden çekilen tek bir örnek grubuna göre değil, İM örnek grubunun muayenesi sonucunda verilir. Alınan örnek grubu birli örnekleme planındakinden daha küçüktür. Bu durumda partinin çapı büyüdükçe çift örneklemeden sağlanan kontrol giderlerinden tasarruf daha fazla olur. Ardışık örnekleme planlarında, örnek büyüklüğü bir sabit değer değil, bir tesadüfi değişkendir. Bu yöntemin en belirgin özelliği aşamalardan oluşmasıdır. Muayenenin her aşamasında, yeni örnekler alınmasına gereksinim olup olmadığına, yani muayenenin devam edip etmeyeceğine belirli kurallar çerçevesinde karar verilir. Bu örnekleme planlarının hazırlanması ve kullanıma geçirilmesi için kolay anlaşılır ve uygulanabilir tablolar geliştirilmiştir ki bunlar standart örnekleme tablolar olarak adlandırılırlar. Bu yöntemlerden yola çıkılarak bir örnekleme planı dizayn edilmiş ve bir işletmede uygulanmıştır.

Özet (Çeviri)

SUMMARY ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING IN RECEIVING INSPECTION The trend in industry has been to shift the burden of ensuring incoming quality to the vendor. Various quality assurance programs are being developed in which the vendor provides proof of product quality to the purchaser. Vendor documentation of ongoing quality improvement programs is usually required, along with access to control charts at critical process points. The receiving companies also have a vendor-rating system based on the quality history of the vendor. Sampling does a good job of accepting very good lots and rejecting very bad lots. Unfortunately, a large area on inspection lies in the middle. The sampling rules in all the formal sample plans are based on probability, but the application of probability predicts the acceptance of lots with substandard quality. When production has already taken place, we often wish to know the quality level of the lot. When a supplier ships a batch of parts, for example, should they be accepted as good or not? Acceptance sampling is the statistical quality control technique for making these kinds of decisions. To specify a particular sampling plan, we indicate the sample size, n, and the number of defectives in the sample permitted, c (acceptance number), before the entire lot from which the sample was drawn is to be rejected. The operating characteristics (OC) curve for a particular combination of n and c shows how well the plan discriminates between good and bad lots. Therefore, if the actual quality is good, the plan provides for a high probability of acceptance, but if the actual quality is poor, the probability of acceptance is low. Thus, the OC curve shows how well a given plan discriminates between good and poor quality. A sampling plan that discriminates perfectly between good and bad lots would have vertical OC curve. For all lots having percent defectives to the right of the line, the probability of acceptance is zero. Unfortunately, the only plan that could achieve this discrimination is one requiring 100 percent inspection. Therefore, the justification of acceptance sampling turns on a balance between inspection costs and the probable costs of passing bad parts. By making sampling plans more cuscriminating (increasing sample size) or tighter (decreasing acceptance numbers), we can approach any desired level of outgoing quality that we please, but at increasing inspection costs. This increased inspection effort would result in lower probable costs of passing defective parts. At some point the combination of these incremental costs is a minimum. This minimum point defines the most economical XIsampling plan for a given situation. Obviously, if the cost of passing defective products is high, a great deal of inspection is economically justified. To justify 100 percent inspection of a sample, the probable losses due to the passing of bad products would have to be large in relation to inspection costs, perhaps resulting in the loss of contracts and customers. It is on this basis that the Japanese objective of zero defects can be justified. On the other hand, to justify no inspection at all, inspection costs would have to be very large in relation to the probable losses due to passing bad parts. The most usual situation is between these extremes, where there is a risk of not accepting lots that are actually good and a risk of accepting lots that are bad. OC curves can be constructed from data obtained from normal or Poisson distributions. If lots are large, perhaps greater than 10 times the sample size, probabilities for the OC curve can be obtained from the binomial distribution. However, if samples are large, the normal or Poisson approximations are also very good, and they are much more convenient to use. Usually, the lot percent defectives is small and the lots are relatively large, so the Poisson distribution is used to calculate values for the percentage probability of acceptance, for OC curves. We can explain some terms of sampling; AQL (Acceptable Quality Level): Lots of this level of quality are regarded as good, and we wish to have a high probability for their acceptance. a (Producer' s Risk): The probability that lots of the quality level AQL will not be accepted. Usually a=5 percent in practice. LTPD (Lot Tolerance Percent Defective): The dividing line selected between good and bad lots. Lots of this level of quality are regarded as poor, and we wish to have a low probability for their acceptance. P (Consumer' s Risk): The probability that lots of the quality level LTPD will be accepted. Usually (3=10 percent in practice. To specify a plan that meets the requirements for AQL, a, LTPD, and p, we must find a combination of n an c with an OC curve that passes through these points. The mechanics of actually finding specific plans that fit can be accomplished by using standard tables, charts, or formulas that result in the specification of a combination of n and c that closely approximates the requirements set of AQL, a, LTPD, and p. When we set the levels for each of these four values, we are determining two critical points on the OC curve that we desired, points (AQL, a) and (LTPD, P). xuTo specify a plan that meets the requirements for AQL, a, LTPD, and P, we must find a combination of n and c with an OC curve that passes through points (AQL, a) and (LTPD, P). The mechanics of actually finding specific plans that fit can be accomplished by using standard tables, charts, or formulas that result in the specification of a combination of n and c that closely approximates the requirements set for (AQL, a) and (LTPD, P). We can also calculating AOQ ( Average Outgoing Quality). The random sample of size n is inspected, and any defectives found in the sample are replaced with good parts. Based on the number of defectives, c', found in the sample, the entire lot is accepted if c'c. If the lot is rejected, it is subjected to 100 percent inspection, and all defectives found are replaced by good parts. Then, the entire lot of N parts is free of defectives. If, however, the lot is accepted by the sample, we run the risk that some defective parts have passed. The average number of defectives can be calculated. Dodge-Romig provides both tables and charts for sampling plan that provide specified LTPD or AOQL protection with p=10 percent and minimum total inspection. The levels of LTPD or AOQL selected for a given situation depend on the consequences of bad quality. If subsequent operations can catch further defectives without disrupting production, these standards can be fairly loose, but if the lower quality results in high production and quality-related costs, LTPD or AOQL should be held to low levels. Double sampling has the advantage of lower inspection costs for a given level of protection. It is accomplished by taking a smaller sample initially. Based on the results of this sample, the lot is either accepted, rejected, or no final decision is made. In the last instance, a second sample is drawn and a final decision is made based on the combined samples. The disadvantage of double sampling is that the inspection load varies considerably. As with single sampling, Dodge-Romig provides both tables and charts to aid in plan design. These aids are constructed both for the situation where one wishes to specify LTPD or AOQL, with p=10 percent, and for minimum total inspection. In sequential sampling, samples are drawn at random. But after each sample is inspected, the cumulated results are analyzed and a decision made to accept the lot, reject the lot, or take another sample. Sequential sample sizes can be as small as n=l. The main advantage of sequential sampling is a reduction in the total amount of inspection required to maintain a given level of protection. If the number of rejects on the graph rises such that the point falls on or above the reject zone, the lot is rejected. If the point should fall on or below the accept zone, the lot is accepted. Until one of these events occurs, sampling is continued. A sequential sampling plan is specified by the four requirements; AQL, a, LTPD, and p. In turn, these requirements determine the OC curves of the sequential plans that meet the requirements. The disadvantage of sequential sampling is that inspection loads vary considerably. xmThe relative advantages and disadvantages of alternative sampling plans do not rest on the protection from poor quality that can be achieved. The risks involved depend on the OC curve of the plan and can be preset, and specific objectives of LTPD or AOQL protection can be implemented in all three. In the table provides the comparison of several factors that influence the choice among the three type of plans. The bulk of the material presented on acceptance sampling has to do with the derivation of plans that meet specified risk. But what should those risks and quality levels be? The answer depends on the relative costs of inspection and the costs or consequences of passing defective items. If, for example, we were searching for an economical single sampling plan, we could use the Dodge-Romig tables to find several plans at different LTPD or AOQL levels of protection, determining minimum number inspection and the AOQ. There are many published sampling plans that can be followed for incoming inspection. Many companies still use these plans because they believe that they are the best available. MIL-STD-105D is presented here in brief form as an example of a standard sampling plan. A sampling plan developed for the firm according to these standard tables. You can see the comparison of the sampling plan according to the several factors: XIVXV

Benzer Tezler

  1. Tez No

    138804

    Acceptance sampling methods used in quality control and an application

    Kalite kontrolde kullanılan kabul örneklemesi yöntemleri ve bir uygulama

    SENEM ŞAHAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2003

    İstatistikDokuz Eylül Üniversitesi

    İstatistik Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. SÜLEYMAN ALPAYKUT

  2. Tez No

    97844

    Tek aşamalı nitel ve nicel kabul örnekleme planlarına çeşitli yaklaşımlar ve uygulamaları

    Various approaches to single attribute and quantitative acceptance sampling plans and their applications

    MEHTAP SÜZEK

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2000

    İstatistikHacettepe Üniversitesi

    İstatistik Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. HÜLYA ÇINGI

  3. Tez No

    4767

    Toplam kalite kontrolunun sigara teknolojisinde uygulama olanaklarının incelenmesi

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    METİN ÖNER

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1988

    Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliğiİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Üretim Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. MEHMET GÜNEŞ GENÇYILMAZ

  4. Tez No

    507715

    Kentsel atıksu arıtma tesisi anaerobik çamur çürütücülerinin dinamik proses modelleme yaklaşımı ile analizi

    Analysis with dynamic process modeling approach of anaerobic sludge digesters of the urban wastewater treatment plant

    KERİM EKİCİ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2018

    Çevre Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Çevre Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. HAYRETTİN GÜÇLÜ İNSEL

  5. Tez No

    323900

    Effects of gas shielding flow rate on weld quality of tig welding in Ti6Al4V alloy

    Ti6Al4V alaşımı tig kaynağında uygulanan koruyucu gaz parametresinin kaynak kalitesi üzerindeki etkisi

    BANU BERİŞ

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2012

    Mühendislik Bilimleriİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Malzeme Bilimi ve Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. HÜSEYİN ÇİMENOĞLU

Geri Dön