Geri Dön

Çocuklarda magnetik rezonans görüntülemede propofol ile ketaminin karşılaştırmalı değerlendirilmesi

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 59298
  2. Yazar: MEHMET ÖZALEVLİ
  3. Danışmanlar: DOÇ. DR. DİLEK ÖZCENGİZ
  4. Tez Türü: Tıpta Uzmanlık
  5. Konular: Anestezi ve Reanimasyon, Anesthesiology and Reanimation
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1997
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Çukurova Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Tıp Fakültesi
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 45

Özet

We didn't find any dens regions or atelectatic areas in lung tomographic studies in group I. However, dens regions in the dependent parts of the lungs were seen in two patients of group II. Systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure decreased in group I. While heart rate increased, But systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure and heart rate increased in group II. There was not seen statistically significant difference between groups for breathing frequency, and oxygen saturation. Postanaesthetic recovery score (PAR) was found 8 and up 20 of 22 patients in I group (% 91) whereas only in 14 of 20 patients was 8 and up in II group(% 70). In our study, there was not found difference between groups on haemodynami, oxygenation and not causing atelectasia in pediatric patients who have an indication for radiologic procedure. However, postanesthetic recovery time was found to be shorter in propofol group than ketamine group. tn conclusion, We should prefer ketamine in the patients who have an atalectasia risk due to not causing diffuse lung density. 35SUMMARY In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of ketamine and propofol on recovery, oxygenation, haemodynami and formation of atelectasis in radiologic procedure. The protocol was approved by parental consent and ethic committe of Çukurova University. To study, fourtytwo patients who have no lung pathology, in ASA class I or II were accepted. Patients who have indication for radiologic procedure were divided in to two groups. While propofol was used in I. group(n=22), ketamin was used in II. group(n=20). Blood pressure, heart rate, breathing frequency, oxygen saturation and computerised lung tomography in supine position were obtained in all patients before anaesthesia induction. Propofol was administred 100 microgram/kg/min by continuous infusion following 2- 2.5 mg/kg induction doses in group I. Ketamine was applied 0.5-1 mg/kg intermittant bolus in each 10-15 min following 2 mg/kg induction doses in group II. Blood pressure, heart rate, breathing frequency, oxygen saturation was remeasured in 5., 10., 15., 20., 25., 30. minutes after anaesthesia maintenance during computed lung tomography in supine position. Computerised lung tomography was repeated in 60. and 90. minutes during anaesthesia. The patients breathed in air. All the patients were observed for two hours at the end of anaesthesia. Post anaesthetic recovery score (PAS) of patients was determined during this period. There was not found demographic statistically significance between groups(P>0.05). Using computerised tomography, dens regions in the left lung lingular segment was seen in one awake patient. In this patient, ketamine was used for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. Dens regions did not chance in 60 and 90 minutes following anaesthesia There was not seen statistically significant difference between groups for radiologic procedure and time of anaesthesia. 34We didn't find any dens regions or atelectatic areas in lung tomographic studies in group I. However, dens regions in the dependent parts of the lungs were seen in two patients of group II. Systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure decreased in group I. While heart rate increased, But systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure and heart rate increased in group II. There was not seen statistically significant difference between groups for breathing frequency, and oxygen saturation. Postanaesthetic recovery score (PAR) was found 8 and up 20 of 22 patients in I group (% 91) whereas only in 14 of 20 patients was 8 and up in II group(% 70). In our study, there was not found difference between groups on haemodynami, oxygenation and not causing atelectasia in pediatric patients who have an indication for radiologic procedure. However, postanesthetic recovery time was found to be shorter in propofol group than ketamine group. tn conclusion, We should prefer ketamine in the patients who have an atalectasia risk due to not causing diffuse lung density. 35

Özet (Çeviri)

SUMMARY In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of ketamine and propofol on recovery, oxygenation, haemodynami and formation of atelectasis in radiologic procedure. The protocol was approved by parental consent and ethic committe of Çukurova University. To study, fourtytwo patients who have no lung pathology, in ASA class I or II were accepted. Patients who have indication for radiologic procedure were divided in to two groups. While propofol was used in I. group(n=22), ketamin was used in II. group(n=20). Blood pressure, heart rate, breathing frequency, oxygen saturation and computerised lung tomography in supine position were obtained in all patients before anaesthesia induction. Propofol was administred 100 microgram/kg/min by continuous infusion following 2- 2.5 mg/kg induction doses in group I. Ketamine was applied 0.5-1 mg/kg intermittant bolus in each 10-15 min following 2 mg/kg induction doses in group II. Blood pressure, heart rate, breathing frequency, oxygen saturation was remeasured in 5., 10., 15., 20., 25., 30. minutes after anaesthesia maintenance during computed lung tomography in supine position. Computerised lung tomography was repeated in 60. and 90. minutes during anaesthesia. The patients breathed in air. All the patients were observed for two hours at the end of anaesthesia. Post anaesthetic recovery score (PAS) of patients was determined during this period. There was not found demographic statistically significance between groups(P>0.05). Using computerised tomography, dens regions in the left lung lingular segment was seen in one awake patient. In this patient, ketamine was used for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. Dens regions did not chance in 60 and 90 minutes following anaesthesia There was not seen statistically significant difference between groups for radiologic procedure and time of anaesthesia. 34We didn't find any dens regions or atelectatic areas in lung tomographic studies in group I. However, dens regions in the dependent parts of the lungs were seen in two patients of group II. Systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure decreased in group I. While heart rate increased, But systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure and heart rate increased in group II. There was not seen statistically significant difference between groups for breathing frequency, and oxygen saturation. Postanaesthetic recovery score (PAR) was found 8 and up 20 of 22 patients in I group (% 91) whereas only in 14 of 20 patients was 8 and up in II group(% 70). In our study, there was not found difference between groups on haemodynami, oxygenation and not causing atelectasia in pediatric patients who have an indication for radiologic procedure. However, postanesthetic recovery time was found to be shorter in propofol group than ketamine group. tn conclusion, We should prefer ketamine in the patients who have an atalectasia risk due to not causing diffuse lung density. 35

Benzer Tezler

  1. Çocuk hastalarda manyetik rezonans görüntülemede propofol infüzyonuna eklenen ketaminin total propofol dozuna ve taburculuk sürelerine etkisi

    The effect of different bolus doses of ketamine added to propofol infusion during MRI scan on total propofol doses and discharge.

    FATİH DOĞU GEYİK

    Tıpta Uzmanlık

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2010

    Anestezi ve ReanimasyonHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. TURGAY ÖCAL

  2. Çocuklarda manyetik rezonans görüntüleme nedeniyle uygulanan sedasyonun etkinlik ve güvenliği

    Efficacy and safety of sedation used in children because of magnetic resonance imaging

    DEMET ALTUN

    Tıpta Uzmanlık

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2011

    Anestezi ve Reanimasyonİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. EMRE ÇAMCI

  3. Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme yapılan pediatrik olgularda deksmedetomidine ve propofol sedasyonunun karşılaştırılması

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    FERDA ÖZTÜRK

    Tıpta Uzmanlık

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2012

    Anestezi ve ReanimasyonSağlık Bakanlığı

    Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Ana Bilim Dalı

    UZMAN HACER ŞEBNEM YELTEPE TÜRK

  4. Çocuklarda manyetik rezonans görüntülemede sedasyon uygulamalarının güvenilirliği

    Safety of sedation administrations for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging

    HALİL KOCAMAZ

    Tıpta Uzmanlık

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2008

    Çocuk Sağlığı ve HastalıklarıDicle Üniversitesi

    Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. MEHMET ALİ TAŞ

  5. Simetrik santral tegmental trakt hiperintensitesi gösteren serebral palsili ve sağlıklı çocuklarda MRG bulgularının değerlendirilmesi

    Evaluation of MRİ findings in healthy and cerebral palsy children with symmetrical central tegmental tract hyperintensity

    MUHAMMED EMRE BÜYÜKKAPLAN

    Tıpta Uzmanlık

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    Radyoloji ve Nükleer TıpSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi

    Radyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. AVNİ MERTER KEÇELİ