Geri Dön

Separatism in post-Soviet geography and Russian interventionism: The case of Transnistria

Sovyet sonrası coğrafyada ayrılıkçılık ve Rus müdahaleciliği: Transdnyester orneği

  1. Tez No: 594712
  2. Yazar: IVAN RADU
  3. Danışmanlar: DOÇ. DR. ZEYNEP ARKAN TUNCEL
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Uluslararası İlişkiler, International Relations
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2019
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Hacettepe Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: İktisat Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Uluslararası İlişkiler (İngilizce) Bilim Dalı
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 133

Özet

In the context of the collapse of the Soviet Union, a series of separatist movements emerged in the Soviet republics. Following independence, Moldova had to deal with a separatist movement in the Transnistrian region, supported by Russia. The desire not to lose control in the former Soviet area pushed Moscow to get directly involved in the Transnistrian military conflict in 1992. The Russian 14th army that secured the victory of the separatists has been maintained to this day, and after several transformations, changed its status from participant to peacekeeper. The new created separatist republic survived due to its authoritarian regime and economic interests of the Moldovan political elite in Transnistria, a territory outside of the rule of law. In addition to internal obstacles, Russian interventionism pushed by strategic interests in the region represents the main factor that has contributed to the maintenance of the conflict in the current state. Russia is driven by great power ambitions and preservation of its national security to engage in power politics in the strategic area which it calls its 'near abroad', of which Moldova is also a part. The main purpose of Russian intervention in Transnistria is not the region itself but Moldova. In order to prevent Chisinau from integrating in NATO and the European Union, which are Russia's main rivals in the region, Moscow continues to support the Transnistrian separatist regime. The most important instruments of Russian interventionism in Transnistria are: the presence of military troops, political and economic support for the separatist regime and soft power politics in Moldova and Transnistria.

Özet (Çeviri)

In the context of the collapse of the Soviet Union, a series of separatist movements emerged in the Soviet republics. Following independence, Moldova had to deal with a separatist movement in the Transnistrian region, supported by Russia. The desire not to lose control in the former Soviet area pushed Moscow to get directly involved in the Transnistrian military conflict in 1992. The Russian 14th army that secured the victory of the separatists has been maintained to this day, and after several transformations, changed its status from participant to peacekeeper. The new created separatist republic survived due to its authoritarian regime and economic interests of the Moldovan political elite in Transnistria, a territory outside of the rule of law. In addition to internal obstacles, Russian interventionism pushed by strategic interests in the region represents the main factor that has contributed to the maintenance of the conflict in the current state. Russia is driven by great power ambitions and preservation of its national security to engage in power politics in the strategic area which it calls its 'near abroad', of which Moldova is also a part. The main purpose of Russian intervention in Transnistria is not the region itself but Moldova. In order to prevent Chisinau from integrating in NATO and the European Union, which are Russia's main rivals in the region, Moscow continues to support the Transnistrian separatist regime. The most important instruments of Russian interventionism in Transnistria are: the presence of military troops, political and economic support for the separatist regime and soft power politics in Moldova and Transnistria.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Güney Osetya ve Abhazya sorunları çerçevesinde Tiflis-Moskova ilişkileri: 1989-2008

    Tbilisi-Moscow relationships on South Ossetia and Abkhazia issues: 1989-2008

    FARİDA BABAEVA

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2017

    Uluslararası İlişkilerAkdeniz Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. MUSTAFA ÖZTÜRK

  2. Dış Ruslar argümanının Rus dış politikasındaki yerini Transdinyester sorunu üzerinden değerlendirmek

    Evaluation of the place of the Russian foreign argument in Russian foreign policy through the Transdinester problem

    SERHAT CAN DEMİRBAŞ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    Uluslararası İlişkilerGiresun Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ SERDAR KESGİN

  3. Rusya'nın medeniyetsel kimlik inşası olarak Avrasyacılık

    Eurosianism as a civilizational identity building for Russia

    VUGAR IMANOV

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2007

    Siyasal BilimlerMarmara Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. EMİNE BÜŞRA ERSANLI

  4. A post-Soviet state under Russian threat: Explaining Georgia's alignment preferences

    Rus tehdidi altında Sovyet sonrası bir ülke: Gürcistan?ın ittifak seçeneklerinin açıklanması

    MURAT GÜNEYLİOĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2011

    Uluslararası İlişkilerDokuz Eylül Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. NAZİF MANDACI

  5. Neorealizm ve Saldırgan Realizm Teorisi bağlamında Rusya Federasyonu dış politikasında ayrılıkçı hareketlerin kullanımı

    The use of separatist movements in the foreign policy of the Russian Federation in the context of neorealism and Offensive Realism Theory

    EMİN ABBASOV

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2022

    Uluslararası İlişkilerAkdeniz Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. HARUN GÜMRÜKÇÜ