Geri Dön

الإجماع السكوتي وتطوره وتطبيقاته عند الحنفية

Hanefîler'de Sükûtî İcmânın Gelişimi ve Örnek Uygulamaları

  1. Tez No: 852072
  2. Yazar: MUSTAFA SERDAR ÖZCAN
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. RA’ED NASRE ABU MOUNES
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Din, Religion
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2020
  8. Dil: Arapça
  9. Üniversite: University of Jordan (Al-Jami'ah Al-Urdunia)
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: İslam Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: İslam Hukuku Bilim Dalı
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 167

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

This study aimed to clarify the reality of the silent consensus (al-ijmâ' al-sukûtî) and the development of the arguments about it in the Hanafi school through the conditions of the Hanafi jurists, which they have specified to deduce from them, by presenting the issue of its authority in the Hanafi school. The study presented briefly the biography of the Hanafi community (al-madhab), the definition of the silent consensus, the extent of its authority the genres of consensus (al-ijmâ') among the Hanafi jurists, and the highlighted the necessary conditions establish the silent consensus as a source of Shari'a according to the Hanafi jurists and the other schools schoolars and dealt with its significance and the provision of the denier of the silent consensus and its relationship to othe evidences such as the general text of the Islamic sources, their reduction takhsîs and the pats of cause (al-illa) in al-qiyâs, juristic preference (al-estehsân), and the impact of inference by silent consensus through applied examples in the derivative details boks of the Hanafi community. The study showed a set of results. The first one is that the silent consensus was proven as a decisive Islamic evidence among the early Hanafi jurists. They accepted it as an evidence like the mashhûr hadith. However, that it was accepted as a near decisive evidence by the later Hanafi jurists. But despite the fact that it is near decisive, it takes precedence of al-hadith alwahid and al-qiyâs according to all Hanafi jurists. The second one is that the silent consensus means decisiveness in terms of the provision and the opposition to it is prohibited when it comes true certainly, if it is not known that the silent consensus comes certainly true it means near decisiveness, so the opposition to it becomes not forbidden. The third one is that the silent ١٥٨ consensus is considered an evidence which can reduce the extent of the general texts according to Hanafi schoolars. But is being decisive or near decisive evidence has an effect on reducing the extent of another decisive and near decisive evidence. The forth one is, that Hanafi jurists considered it a path of the cause paths in al-qiyâs. The fifth one is that they did not separate between the explicit consensus and silent consensus and opted for the permissibility of juristic preference (al-estehsân) by silent consensus.

Benzer Tezler

  1. الإجماع النحوي عند المرادي (المتوفى: 749ه) دراسة تحليلية

    Analitik bir çalışma olan al-Moradi'nin dilbilgisi konsensüsü (Öldü: 749 ah)

    AMMAR YASİR MAHMOOD ABDULMONEEM

    Yüksek Lisans

    Arapça

    Arapça

    2022

    DinKarabük Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ MOHAMMAD NADER ALI

  2. الإجماع عند الإمام الغزالي

    İmam Gazzȃlȋ'ye göre icmȃ / The consensus (al-icmâ') of Imam Ghazali

    KARAM ABDULSATTAR MURDHI

    Yüksek Lisans

    Arapça

    Arapça

    2021

    DinEskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. YUNUS ARAZ

  3. Hicrî 9. yüzyıl Memzûc fıkıh usûlü eserlerinde İcmâ teorisi(Molla Fenârî, Molla Hüsrev ve İbnü'l-Hümâm)

    نظرية الإجماع في مؤلفات أصول الفقه المملوكية في القرن التاسع الهجري (الملا فناري، الملا خسرو، وابن الهمام)/The Theory of Ijma in the Works of Mamluk Usul al-Fiqh of the 9th Century of the Hijra (Mullah Fanari, Mullah Khosrow, and Ibn al-Humam)

    MUSTAFA İNANÇ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2025

    DinKaramanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. YUSUF ERDEM GEZGİN

  4. أسباب اختلاف الأصوليين الصميري والإسنوي في بابي الإجماع والاجتهاد أنموذجاً

    Köktenciler Al-Sumairi ve Al-Asnawi'nin konsensüs ve ictihad bölümü bir model olarak farklılığının nedenleri. İncelenmesi ve gerçekleştirilmesi

    FAROOQ ABDULMALEK MOHAMMED ALJADIR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Arapça

    Arapça

    2022

    DinÇankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ KUTAİBA FARHAT

  5. تتبّع الرُخَص عند الأصوليّين

    Tetebbu'u'r-Ruhas 'Inde'l-Usûliyyîn

    FAHİD ELALİ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Arapça

    Arapça

    2024

    DinNevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. MERTER RAHMİ TELKENAROĞLU