Geri Dön

Sosyal Sigortalar Kurumu'nun işverene ve üçüncü kişiye rücuu

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 16862
  2. Yazar: AYDIN BAŞBUĞ
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. SARPER SÜZEK
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Hukuk, Law
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1991
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 161

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

ABSTRACT In the law establishing the Institution for Social Insurance {(SI) of Turkey, it is prescribed that the Institution has the right of recovery against the employer and third party. The reason underlying this clause is recovering the loss the Institution faces due to health insurance applied for work accidents or professional diseases. The right to recovery is a right accruing directly from the law, since it has the objective to recover the losses of the Institution. Therefore,' the legal aspect of this right is not based on the principle of subrogation. The extent of this right which the Institution possesses is independent from the rights the insured may seek against the employer or a third party. For the legal base of the right to recovery is directly stemmed from the law, the employer has a şui 2.S.U.S.LİS. liability, different and apart from his liability against the employee. The employer who has an objective liability within the Law of Obligations and Law of Labor, is in a position to adopt a liability against the Institution which is based on the principle of negligency in the same case. For this reason, it is necessary to consider the liability emerged due to not taking proper measures regarding the worker health and work security as a negligency. The liability of the employer as the person who employes the worker, is different from his liability defined in the Law of Obligations. The employer is liable for the assistance from the insurance for professional diseases or for work accident, in case both himself and the employee are neg 1 i gen t. The liability of the employer for not fulfilling the responsibility of presenting the declaration of employment has been expanded. The employer in case he does not issue a declaration of employment, should pay the aid from the insurance covering professional diseases or work accidents, regardless whether he is negligent or not. w

Benzer Tezler

  1. Yargıtay kararları ışğında iş kazaları

    Work accidents with supreme courts decisions

    ASLI NANECİ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2008

    HukukErciyes Üniversitesi

    Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. FARUK ANDAÇ

  2. İşsizlik sigortası ve Türkiye

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    CEYLAN ER

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1994

    Kamu Yönetimiİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. NAZİF KUYUCUKLU

  3. Türk iş hukukunda iş kazası ve işvereni sorumluluğu

    Work accident and employer liability in Turkish labor law

    HAKAN ÖZKAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    HukukYeditepe Üniversitesi

    Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ REFİK CEM DİNAR

  4. İş kazası ve meslek hastalıklarında tarafların hak ve yükümlülükleri (sigortalı-işveren-SSK)

    Right and debts of sides (workers, employers, insurance company) in work related accidents and work-related illnesses

    ERDAL ŞENSOY

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2002

    Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileriUludağ Üniversitesi

    Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. İLKNUR KILKIŞ

  5. Türk Sosyal Sigortalar Hukukunda işverenin prim ödeme yükümlülüğü

    The Obligation of premium paying of the employer in Turkish social insurence law

    DOĞAN KORKMAZ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1996

    HukukAnkara Üniversitesi

    PROF.DR. SARPER SÜZEK