Geri Dön

İşçilerin serbest dolaşımı açısından Avrupa Topluluğu ve Türkiye-Avrupa Topluluğu ilişkileri

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 36423
  2. Yazar: FATİH KARAKULLUKÇU
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. HALUK GÜNUĞUR
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Ekonomi, Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri, Economics, Labour Economics and Industrial Relations
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1994
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 143

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

The economic object of the freedom of movement of persons is to create a Common Market in manpower. The political object is to create a greater cohesion of the peoples of the Community through the elimina tion of barriers to migration and the promotion of a“Community citi zenship”. The Treaty makes a distinction beteen 'workers' which may include members of a religious order if their membership constitutes an econo mic activity and“self-employed persons”. The former enjoy the“freedom of movement”the latter the“freedom of establishment”. Fredoom of movement implies the right of entry, residence and exit. It means in particular the rihgt to accept offers of employment; move freely within the territory of the host country for this purpose, reside in a host country for the purpose of employment and remain there after the termination of employment in accordance with implementing regulations. Expulsion is also governed by Communtiy rules. As a corollary the Mem ber States are bound to abolish any discrimination based on nationality between workers as regards employment, remuneration and other con ditions of work and employment. In principle only the citizens of the Member States are entitled to move freely within the Community but each Member State defines accor ding to its own law who its citizens are and how the citizenship is acqui red and lost. The principal Community legislation now in force, that is Regulation 1 61 6/68, is adddessed to“workers”in the sense of Community law rat her than national law. The term comprises persons in actual employment in the host country; persons looking for employment; unemployed who T.C. 70KSEKÖÖRETİM KUINIU142 are capable of working and have previously been employed; persons incapable of working through illness or injury sustained during employ ment in the host country; as well as retired persons, ie persons who have reached the normal age of retirement whilst working in the host country. Freedom of movement does not include“employment in the public service”though once so employed the worker is protected from discrimi nation on the ground of his nationality. According to the Treaty the Member States may restrict the move ment of workers, self employed persons and providers of services on the grounds of public policy, public security and public health. However, being in the nature of a derogation, this power of the Member States has to be interpreted strictly. Several cases involving refusal of entry and expul sion have highlighted the problem of defining“public policy”, ie whether to allow the Member States to apply their own criteria or whether to for mulate a Community concept of public policy. The matter is still to be settled though the Court has stressed on occasions that public policy al lowing a derogation from the principle of free movement, has to be in terpreted stricty and that the Member States' discretion has to be app lied within the limits of the Treaty. It means, in effect, that the use of derogation is reduced to cases of a particularly repulsive behaviour of the individual concerned, criminal convictions not being per se a ground of expulsion, and that it cannot serve an economic purpose sucH as to protect the jobs of a Member State's citizens. There must be fair hea ring, a right of appeal and the procedure ought not to be more onerous than the procedure in comparable administrative cases of a domestic nature.Social security and social rights of workers is another matter of Article 49 and 5 1 regulate this matter. Turkey -EC relations conutinue for a long time and free movement for Turkish workers within the Community has became an important problem between EC and Turkey in last years. The agreement between Turkey and EC (Ankara Agrement) contains on article about free move ment for workers. In addition to this article, there are also similar provi sions in Supplementary Protocol and Association Council decisions whose numbers are 2/76 and 1/80 Particularly 2/76 and 1/80 decisions are important steps in respect of free movement of Turkish workers. Article 12 of the Agreement and article 36 of the Supplementary Protocol specify that freedon of movement for workers between the Member States and the associated state is to be secured between the ent öf the twelfth and the twenty-second year after the Agreement came into force (i.e. 1 December 1975 and 1 December 1986). The pro cedures for this were to be established by the Association Council. The Community has refrained from ever putting this point on the Association Council agenda, however; the matter thus remains a dead letter and one of the clauses of the Agreement consequently remains in abeyance. Thre are three European Court of Justice's judgements about free movement of Turkih workers: Demirel Judgement, Sevince Judgement and Kuş Judgement. Jurisprudence pertaining to free movement has been gradually develepod on behalf of Turkish workers.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Tez No

    81642

    Avrupa Birliği Hukukunda sosyal güvenlik ve Türkiye-Avrupa Birliği ilişkilerindeki etkisi

    The Social Security Law of the European Union and the effect of Turkey-European Union relations

    CELAL POLAT

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1999

    EkonomiAnkara Üniversitesi

    Avrupa Topluluğu Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. AYŞE FÜSUN ARSAVA

  2. Tez No

    122928

    Avrupa Birliği'nde Türk işgücünün serbest dolaşımı

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    GÜROL ÖZCÜRE

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2002

    Uluslararası İlişkilerİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Avrupa Topluluğu Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. GÜLTEN KUTAL

  3. Tez No

    190572

    Free movement of workers in the European Union with special reference to EU-Turkey relations

    Avrupa Birliği'nde işçilerin serbest dolaşımı ve bu bağlamda Türkiye-Avrupa Birliği ilişkileri

    YUSUF AYAR

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2006

    HukukMarmara Üniversitesi

    Avrupa Birliği Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. MURAT YÖRÜNG

  4. Tez No

    122806

    Avrupa Birliği'nde malların ve kişilerin serbest dolaşımı ilkesinin Avrupa Topluluğu mahkemesinin kararları ışığında incelenmesi

    Examination of the free movement of persons and goods in European Union in light of the decisions of European Court of justice

    IŞIK GÜNGÖR ŞENSOY

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2002

    Hukukİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Avrupa Topluluğu Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ŞENER AKYOL

  5. Tez No

    330471

    Avrupa Birliği'nde birlik vatandaşlığı bağlamında kişilerin serbest dolaşımı ve KKTC'nin AB müktesebatına uyumu

    The free movement of persons in the framework of union citizenship in the European Union and the adaptation of TRNC to the Acquis Communautaire

    GÜLDEN ÇİFTÇİOĞLU

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2012

    Uluslararası İlişkilerAnkara Üniversitesi

    Avrupa Birliği ve Uluslararası Ekonomik İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. TUĞRUL ARAT

Geri Dön