Geri Dön

Marx and Adorno: Value-form and negative dialectics

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 401019
  2. Yazar: ALİ CANER YILDIRIM
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. GORDON FINLAYSON
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Felsefe, Philosophy
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2012
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: University of Sussex
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 65

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

I'hc csscnlialily ol'Marx's philosophy to understand Adomo's writings had been, in a certain way. an overlooked fact. Instead of works focusing on this relation, hitherto studies were clustered around a chardcieri/aiion of Adomo as a critic of ideolog) by way of accessing him through his relalively more popular writings. This phenomenon, as a result, gave rise to readings of his philt)sophy as if It epitomizes a rupture between Marx and Marxian philosophy. Without a doubt it is not aimed to ensure a llctitious and ideological homogeneity in Marxist/Marxian philosophy as a whole in this work. Nevertheless, against this fashionable, as well as reductive approach towards Adorno's philosophy, it is argued that Adomo is a complementary to Marx's philosophy and it is a necessity to read Adomo through Marx and vice \ ersa to be able to access the truth \ alue of these two philosophers' philosophical accounts. The nexus of their negative critique of capitalism is the intricacy of non-conceptual and use-value with regard to the identarian concept of value-form. Both of these notions, simultaneously point towards the non-idenlical components of experience within capitali.st society along with the qualitative indiv idualitics which are“not yet”, i.e. through seeking the abolition of the value-form, they point beyond capitali.st society as an aujhebung. Both non-conceptual(s) and u.se-\ alue in capitalist society are to be constructed as concepts“set in motion', that is. they would he beyond identity and contradiction in post-capitalist society. By virtue of this the subject-objecl and universal-particular relation will be at a condition of ”peace“ (in Adorno's words) and ”freedom- (in Marx's words).

Benzer Tezler

  1. 20. yüzyıl Marksizminde bir gerilim: Bilim mi felsefe mi?

    A dilemma in 20th century's Marxism: Science or philosophy?

    ERSİN VEDAT ELGÜR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2006

    FelsefeHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ.DR. CEMAL GÜZEL

  2. Theodor W. Adorno'da özgürlük ve ahlak ilişkisi

    The relationship between freedom and morality in Theodor W. Adorno

    RIDVAN KARAMAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    FelsefeVan Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ MEHMET CAFER ŞAKAR

  3. Theodor W. Adorno ve Michel Foucault'da hakikat ve iktidar ilişkisi

    The truth and power relationship in Theodor W. Adorno and Michel Foucault

    METİN BECERMEN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2009

    FelsefeHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Bölümü

    PROF. DR. KURTULUŞ DİNÇER

  4. The analysis of alienation [entfremdung] in being and time from a marxist perspective

    Varlık ve zaman?daki yabancılaşma [entfremdung] kavramının marksist bakış açısından analizi

    EDA KESKİN

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2010

    FelsefeOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Bölümü

    PROF. DR. AHMET İNAM

  5. Meta bolluğunun fantazmagorik teşhiri: Dünya fuarlarının emsali niteliğindeki İzmir Enternasyonal Fuarı'nda tüketim kültürü ve gösterinin tezahürleri

    The phantasmagorical display of commodity abundance: The consumer culture's and the spectacle's manifestations in the Izmir International Fair

    EMRE HAÇAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2022

    SosyolojiGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Radyo Televizyon ve Sinema Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ GÜLSÜN GÜVENLİ