Marx and Adorno: Value-form and negative dialectics
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 401019
- Danışmanlar: DR. GORDON FINLAYSON
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Felsefe, Philosophy
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2012
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: University of Sussex
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 65
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
I'hc csscnlialily ol'Marx's philosophy to understand Adomo's writings had been, in a certain way. an overlooked fact. Instead of works focusing on this relation, hitherto studies were clustered around a chardcieri/aiion of Adomo as a critic of ideolog) by way of accessing him through his relalively more popular writings. This phenomenon, as a result, gave rise to readings of his philt)sophy as if It epitomizes a rupture between Marx and Marxian philosophy. Without a doubt it is not aimed to ensure a llctitious and ideological homogeneity in Marxist/Marxian philosophy as a whole in this work. Nevertheless, against this fashionable, as well as reductive approach towards Adorno's philosophy, it is argued that Adomo is a complementary to Marx's philosophy and it is a necessity to read Adomo through Marx and vice \ ersa to be able to access the truth \ alue of these two philosophers' philosophical accounts. The nexus of their negative critique of capitalism is the intricacy of non-conceptual and use-value with regard to the identarian concept of value-form. Both of these notions, simultaneously point towards the non-idenlical components of experience within capitali.st society along with the qualitative indiv idualitics which are“not yet”, i.e. through seeking the abolition of the value-form, they point beyond capitali.st society as an aujhebung. Both non-conceptual(s) and u.se-\ alue in capitalist society are to be constructed as concepts“set in motion', that is. they would he beyond identity and contradiction in post-capitalist society. By virtue of this the subject-objecl and universal-particular relation will be at a condition of ”peace“ (in Adorno's words) and ”freedom- (in Marx's words).
Benzer Tezler
- 20. yüzyıl Marksizminde bir gerilim: Bilim mi felsefe mi?
A dilemma in 20th century's Marxism: Science or philosophy?
ERSİN VEDAT ELGÜR
- Theodor W. Adorno'da özgürlük ve ahlak ilişkisi
The relationship between freedom and morality in Theodor W. Adorno
RIDVAN KARAMAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2024
FelsefeVan Yüzüncü Yıl ÜniversitesiFelsefe Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ MEHMET CAFER ŞAKAR
- Theodor W. Adorno ve Michel Foucault'da hakikat ve iktidar ilişkisi
The truth and power relationship in Theodor W. Adorno and Michel Foucault
METİN BECERMEN
- The analysis of alienation [entfremdung] in being and time from a marxist perspective
Varlık ve zaman?daki yabancılaşma [entfremdung] kavramının marksist bakış açısından analizi
EDA KESKİN
- Meta bolluğunun fantazmagorik teşhiri: Dünya fuarlarının emsali niteliğindeki İzmir Enternasyonal Fuarı'nda tüketim kültürü ve gösterinin tezahürleri
The phantasmagorical display of commodity abundance: The consumer culture's and the spectacle's manifestations in the Izmir International Fair
EMRE HAÇAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2022
SosyolojiGalatasaray ÜniversitesiRadyo Televizyon ve Sinema Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ GÜLSÜN GÜVENLİ
