Geri Dön

The role of collective mobilization in the divergence of the rural economies of China and India (1950-1990)

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

PDF İndir

  1. Tez No: 402968
  2. Yazar: BURAK GÜREL
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. JOEL ANDREAS
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Kamu Yönetimi, Public Administration
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2015
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Johns Hopkins University
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 525

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

The economic divergence of China and India in the post-1950 era has appeared as one of the most intriguing puzzles of comparative and historical social sciences in recent decades. In 1950, although both countries were very poor, China was much poorer, with a per capita GDP 38% less than that of India. This situation changed completely in the decades following Indian independence (1947) and the Chinese Revolution (1949). China's economy caught up with India's in 1978 and greatly surpassed it later on, making its per capita GDP 30% higher than India's in 1990. The differential performance of their rural economies contributed significantly to this outcome. This study argues that this outcome was closely related to two countries' differential performance in the development of physical infrastructure and human capital in the countryside. In China, the radical land reform of 1947-52 and the rural collectivization after 1952 eliminated the power of the rural elite, flattened the political economic terrain, and enabled the state to establish the rural collectives. By mobilizing unpaid labor and financial resources of the villagers through the mediation of the rural collectives, the Chinese state developed rural infrastructure, technology, and human capital at a pace and geographical scope that was far beyond its limited fiscal capacity. Rural collectives also enabled the state to tax the increasing agricultural surplus and utilize it for agricultural modernization and rural industrialization. I argue that efforts by the Indian state to establish rural organizations with similar mobilization capabilities failed due to the effective opposition of well-entrenched political and economic interests in the countryside. Unable to mobilize the unpaid labor and financial resources of the rural population, the Indian government relied primarily on its limited fiscal resources, which produced a much slower and geographically narrower development of physical infrastructure and human capital. It also failed to tax the agricultural surplus effectively, which constrained agricultural modernization and rural industrialization. As a result, China's agriculture and rural economy developed much more rapidly than India's, which contributed significantly to the divergence of their economies in the post-1950 era.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Tez No

    515202

    Humanitarian assistance policies of the European Union towards syrian refugees in Turkey

    Avrupa Birliği'nin Türkiye'deki Suriyeli mültecilere yönelik insani yardım politikaları

    CANSU ÇELİKER

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2018

    Siyasal BilimlerOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. BAŞAK KALE LACK

  2. Tez No

    250650

    The role and impact of the United Nations in confronting international terrorism in the aftermath of september 11: prospects and challenges in the fight against global jihadism

    Birleşmiş Milletler?in 11 eylül saldırıları sonrasında uluslararası terörizm ile mücadelesindeki rolü ve etkisi: Küresel jihad akımına karşı mücadelede fırsatlar ve zorluklar

    DERİN KAYALAR

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2009

    Uluslararası İlişkilerOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü

    PROF. DR. HÜSEYİN BAĞCI

  3. Tez No

    830078

    Mobilizasyon teorisi bağlamında büyük Zonguldak grevi

    The great Zonguldak strike in the context of the mobilization theory

    BÜLENT ÖZEL

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2023

    Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileriZonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi

    Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. SADIK KILIÇ

  4. Tez No

    829392

    Authoritarian stability: The role of international cooperation in the Iranian regime's survival

    Otoriter istikrar: İran rejiminin hayatta kalmasında uluslararası işbirliğinin rolü

    FATEMEH LESANI

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2023

    Uluslararası İlişkilerAtılım Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. NİLGÜN ELİKÜÇÜK YILDIRIM

  5. Tez No

    117362

    Formation and representation of interests in Turkish political economy:The case of MÜSİAD(Independent Industrialist's and Businessmen's Association)

    Türkiye Ekonomi politiğinde çıkar oluşumu ve temsili: MÜSİAD(Müstaki Sanayici ve İşadamları Derneği) örnek çalışması

    MURAT ÇEMREK

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2002

    Kamu Yönetimiİhsan Doğramacı Bilkent Üniversitesi

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. HOOTAN SHAMBAYATİ

Geri Dön