Geri Dön

Dil ve siyaset: Türk siyasal söyleminde siyasetçi profili ve siyasetin anlamlandırılması

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 41630
  2. Yazar: Ö. AYKUT ÇELEBİ
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. COŞKUN SAN
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Kamu Yönetimi, Siyasal Bilimler, Public Administration, Political Science
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1995
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 299

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

Summary of the Thesis This thesis which is titled as“Language and Politics: The Profile of Politicians and Signification of Politics in Turkey”, was prepared in relation to partial fulfillment of Ph. D. program and submitted to the Institute of Social Sciences of University of Ankara. The thesis is composed of three main parts analyzing the theoretical conditions and norms of a democratic politics which had substatially enormous impacts on the structuration of politics in Turkey. Besides of those analytical chapters, it was hold three more sections in the thesis which have been titled followingly. In the methodological appendix, the empirical techniques used during the work were described and made tecnical arguments about the some aspects of them. In the glossary section, the explication of some of the concepts that are employed during the work were given. Lastly, The theoretical and empirical materials which are cited in the text documented in the reference section. In the first chapter of the thesis, the concept of public sphere was presented and conceptualized both as a norm and substance. Therefore, following, J. Habermas and H. Arendt, the public sphere was formulated as an open, critical and rational dialogue between social actors and their different 'opinions'. Public sphere as an agora(space) and social context(public encounter) provides the normative framework of democratic participation and opinion formation. In the second chapter, it was showed and described the tension between the meta-narratives of the nation-state's logic of discursive organization and public policy orientation of the interest based, particularistic collective movements. It was assumed that language has been significant role in this process. It is based on a presupposition that language does not only describe or picture reality but signify as well. Discourse as sum of the meaningful activities and its signification by mediation of language, is higly related to the narrative stuructures of hegemonic ideologies. 298Ideology was defined as struggle over meaning which serves to sustain asymetric power relations and domination. Thus it was tried to reach a conclusion which has verified the main assumption: Dialogue and discourse are mutually exclusive in terms of political signification. Discourses are institutionalized narrative structures which define ex post facto conditions of reality by means of linguistics justifications. Dialogue is oriented to reach an identity/difference or agreement, discourse on the contrary, is oriented to homogenize the identities which are multiple and historically constructed in nature. In the third part it was analysed comparatively the structure of Turkish political discourses in which distinct opinions bear direct resemblences with each other with respect to their political opinion formatin procedures. The underlying reason of this process can be explined as the absence of the autonomous public spheres. Turkish political scene has been constructed within the boundairies of populistic and nationalistic discourses by the actions and policies of the political elites. Therefore, it was tried to show that Demirel, Ecevit and partially Özal not only because of their political personalities have been important but at the same time they have defined or limited the political parameters of the concept of the political in Turkey. ftff ty#P 299

Benzer Tezler

  1. Sosyal demokrasi çizgisinde 1945-1977 arası CHP dönüşümü ve ortanın solu

    In the social democracy line between 1945-1977, CHP transformation & left of center

    TAYFUN SÖĞÜT

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2020

    Siyasal BilimlerAltınbaş Üniversitesi

    Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ AKİF BAHADIR KAYNAK

  2. Das begriffsfeld 'Europa' in den antrittsreden der Türkischen ministerpräsidenten und deutschen bundeskanzler seit 1949 ein beitrag zur politolinguistischen diskursanalyse

    1949 sonrası Türk başbakanları ve Alman Şansölyeleri'nin göreve başlama konuşmalarında 'Avrupa' kavram alanı siyasal dilbilimsel söylem analizine bir katkı

    ONUR ZENGİN

    Doktora

    Almanca

    Almanca

    2017

    Alman Dili ve EdebiyatıHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Alman Dili ve Edebiyatı Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. NİHAT ÜLNER

  3. Türkiye'de güvenlik söyleminin kuruluşu: TBMM tutanakları üzerinden bir inceleme (1978-2002)

    Formation of security discourse in Turkey: An investigation of parlimentary minutes (Turkish national assembly) 1978-2002

    TAHA BARAN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2018

    Siyasal BilimlerYıldız Teknik Üniversitesi

    Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ELÇİN MACAR

  4. Türk Ocakları ve siyaset (1960' tan günümüze)

    Türk Ocakları and politics (from 1960 up to now)

    AYTEKİN ERSAL

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2004

    Türk İnkılap TarihiHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılap Tarihi Ana Bilim Dalı

    Y.DOÇ.DR. AYTEN SEZER

  5. Hate speech on the Turkish Twitter-sphere

    Türk Twitter'da nefret söylemi

    LINA FAHID JAMIL HADDADIN

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2021

    Siyasal BilimlerMarmara Üniversitesi

    Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ ÖZDEN SEZGİ DURGUN ÖZKAN