Geri Dön

'ben' ve 'başka-ben' ler sorunsalı ve oyunculuk sanatı

Problem of 'ego' and 'other-ego' and art of acting

  1. Tez No: 51643
  2. Yazar: ENGİN ŞENGÜL
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. ŞAHİN YENİŞEHİRLİOĞLU
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Felsefe, Sahne ve Görüntü Sanatları, Philosophy, Performing and Visual Arts
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1996
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 145

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

Summary In this work, I wanted to realize the philosophy of art on a particular art, the art of acting, and on the particular system of this art, Stanislavsky's system of acting. Therefore, I defined the most fundamental philosophical problem of the art of acting, and I analysed and scrutinized it in the philosophy of Sartre who is an“existentialist”philosopher. The mainest philosophical problem of the art of acting is the problem of“ego”and“other-ego”s. Because the definition of the acting for the many kinds of acting, including Stanislavsky's is“with an artistic aim, an ”ego“' s effort of get changing itself to an ”other-ego“ and therefore an ”ego“' s effort of changing to an ”other-ego“. Thus this work has those three sections: The Art of Acting and Stanislavsky, The Philosophical Problems of Art of Acting, The Problem of ”Ego“ and ”Other-Ego“s and Sartre. When I synthesized the knowledges on these three sections and thought on them, I concluded as the following: The main subject examined by both Sartre and Stanislavsky is ”the individual who lives with consciousness of his existence“; and they examine this subject with mainly the concepts of ”conciousness“, ”ego“ and ”other-ego“. Sartre's these thougts on the context of being, knowledge and value are deeper than Stanislavky's; but Stanislavsky thinks also about the effort of synthesizing the ”ego“ and ”other-ego“. The main questions which are replied by Sartre are: How can ”F base my own being and the beings of“other-ego”s? What are the structures of these beings? What is the structure of my knowledge about myself and about“other-ego”s? What is the structure of relations between“ego”,“other- ego”s and values? It is obvious that the effort of replying this questions can light“ego”who will both get change and change and“other-ego”who is changed to and therefore it can light the art of acting, too.

Benzer Tezler

  1. F. W. G. Hegel'in Efendi-Köle diyalektiği'nin J. P. Sartre felsefesi'ne yansıması: Ben ve başkabenler sorunsalı

    Reflection of F.W.G. Hegel's Master-Slave dialectic in J.P. sartre's philosophy: I and other problematic

    FİLİZ BAŞAĞAÇ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2013

    FelsefeMersin Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ZEHRAGÜL AŞKIN

  2. Network neutrality in the internet as a two sided market constituted by congestion sensitive end users and content providers

    Yoğunluğa duyarlı son kullanıcılar ve içerik üreticilerinden oluşan internette ağ tarafsızlığı

    ÖZGÜR KAPLANLIOĞLU

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2023

    Ekonomiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    İktisat Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. BÜLENT GÜLOĞLU

    PROF. DR. SENCER ECER

  3. Aspect verbal en grec Istanbouliote: modele de description fonctionnaliste

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    EMİNE YAVAŞGEL

    Yüksek Lisans

    Fransızca

    Fransızca

    1993

    Dilbilimİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Yabancı Diller Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. NÜKHET GÜZ