Understanding the change in intelligence organizations: An institutional framework
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 720328
- Danışmanlar: DR. DAVİD REDLAWSK
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Kamu Yönetimi, Public Administration
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2020
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Unıversıty Of Delaware
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
The central goal of this dissertation is to explain why and how intelligence organizations change. The transformation of intelligence organizations often examined under organizational studies, bureaucracy studies, and intelligence studies and has never been a primary focus of research. This dissertation brings a new and overarching perspective to explain the transformation of intelligence organizations. To be more specific, it argues that three factors trigger the change in intelligence organizations: cataclysmic events, external threats, and domestic threats. Further, this dissertation also argues that regime type determines how intelligence organizations change. In order to explore the transformation of intelligence organizations within different regimes, I study twelve events under three cases: 9/11, 15th July 2016 Coup Attempt and the end of the Cold War as cataclysmic events; Russian aggression after 2010, Syrian Civil War, and Ukraine Conflict after 2010, and the emergence of ISIS as external threats; and domestic terrorism in the US in the 1990s, PKK, and Chechen terrorism in the 1990s as domestic threats. For each case, I study the background of events, official intelligence documents, statements of senior policymakers and intelligence officials, and available data. Also, I conduct interviews with nine national security experts. The findings confirm the predictions of the institutional framework presented in this dissertation. ABSTRACT xvii The analysis demonstrated that cataclysmic events led to a major transformation in the intelligence community regardless of regime type. However, this transformation occurred 1) slower in the US, 2) quicker in Russia, and 3) in a hybrid way in Turkey. Furthermore, even though traditional external threats led to regular change regardless of regime type, non-state external threats led to 4) a slow transformative change in the US, 5) a quick regular change in Russia, and 6) a hybrid change in Turkey. Last, domestic threats led to 7) slow regular change in the US, 8) a quick transformative change in Russia, and 9) a hybrid change in Turkey.
Benzer Tezler
- Understanding the change in intelligence organizations: An institutional framework
İstihbarat örgütlerinde yaşanan değişimi anlamak: Kurumsal bir çerçeve
AHMET ATEŞ
Doktora
İngilizce
2020
Unıversıty Of DelawareSiyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı
Yükleniyor...
- Exploring opinions of corporate instructional designers on their professional development and training needs
Kurumsal öğretim tasarımcılarının mesleki gelişim ve eğitim ihtiyaçları konusundaki görüşlerinin araştırılması
NAZLI GÖKALP
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2025
Orta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiEğitim Programları ve Öğretim Ana Bilim Dalı
Yükleniyor...
- Çoklu afetlerde yapay zeka yaklaşımı
Artificial intelligence approach in multi-disasters
SANEM ÖZTÜRK
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2026
Sakarya ÜniversitesiYangın ve Yangın Güvenliği Ana Bilim Dalı (disiplinlerarası)
Yükleniyor...