Geri Dön

The Interface between the Comman European Framework of Reference and Processability Theory: Emprical Research

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 760204
  2. Yazar: CANSU AKAN
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. ANGELA HAHN
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Kamu Yönetimi, Çevre Mühendisliği, Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlama, Public Administration, Environmental Engineering, Urban and Regional Planning
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: cross-sectional, Processability Theory, the CEFR, interface, stages, levels
  7. Yıl: 2019
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 87

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

This cross-sectional study investigates the interface between the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) (Council of Europe (CoE), 2001, 2017) and Processability Theory (PT) (Pienemann, 1998, 2005). The CEFR is a reference tool which classifies what a learner can or cannot do at a specific language level while learning a language. PT is a psycholinguistic approach to SLA which proposes that every L2 learner follows a developmental hierarchy when acquiring a second language and spells out“the order in which morpho-syntactic phenomena emerge in the learner's production”(Håkansson, 2016, p. 111). While PT provides an empirical framework for learner development, the CEFR, indeed, has been criticized for lacking a sound theoretical background and SLA informed design (Alderson, 2007; Hulstijn et al., 2010; Hulstijn, 2007; Huhta et al., 2014; Little, 2007). The aim of this empirical study is to find out a possible interface between the CEFR levels and PT stages and whether PT can inform the CEFR level rating scales that have come in for a lot of criticism due to“the missing linguistic, psycholinguistic, and sociolinguistic poles underneath”, which create a“shaky ground”(Hulstijn, 2007, p. 663). The hypothesis is that there is an interface between the CEFR levels and PT stages, but not in all. It is hypothesized that for those in which an interface is found, PT can contribute to the theoretical background of the CEFR, making it a sounder reference tool. To this end, the data for this study is elicited through communicative tasks, which are recorded for further transcription. Informants are first assigned a CEFR level based on their oral production by four trained raters and then, are profiled by means of distributional analysis in PT framework. The results obtained through distributional analysis are implicationally scaled to diagnose PT Stages of the informants. The findings are compared and analysed qualitatively. The results are promising and confirm the hypotheses that there is an interface between PT stages and the CEFR levels. The interface seems to be more present at lower levels in comparison to higher levels. In line with this finding, it is put forward that PT has the potential the compensate for the theoretical shortcomings of the CEFR scales especially at lower levels.

Benzer Tezler

  1. The 21st century higher education EFL learner profile with e-classroom interactional competence via learning-oriented assessment: A case study

    21. yüzyıl yüksek öğrenimde öğrenme odaklı değerlendirme yoluyla e-sınıf içi etkileşim yetkinliğine sahip yabancı dil olarak Ingilizce öğrenen öğrenci profili: Bir durum çalışması

    FİGEN YILMAZ

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2022

    Eğitim ve ÖğretimÇukurova Üniversitesi

    İngiliz Dili Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. GÜLDEN TÜM

    PROF. DR. SONGÜL TÜMKAYA

  2. Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde okuduğunu anlama ve yazma becerileri aracılığıyla Türk toplum bilgisi paylaşımı

    Turkish social knowledge transfer through reading comprehension and writing skills in teaching Turkish to foreigners

    TUĞÇE TOGAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2023

    Eğitim ve ÖğretimMarmara Üniversitesi

    Türkçe ve Sosyal Bilgiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ASUMAN AHMED ABDO SHABAN

    DOÇ. DR. ASLI FİŞEKCİOĞLU

  3. Communication interculturelle dans l'enseignement de langue etrangere : Analyse des opinions des enseignants à travers les exemples de la France et de la Turquie

    Yabancı dil öğretiminde kültürlerarası iletişim : Fransa ve Türkiye örneklerinde öğretmen görüşleri incelemesi

    GİZEM KÖŞKER

    Doktora

    Fransızca

    Fransızca

    2017

    Eğitim ve ÖğretimAnadolu Üniversitesi

    Yabancı Diller Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. GÜLNİHAL GÜLMEZ

  4. Hapishanelerde ifade özgürlüğü bağlamında kitap yasakları

    Book bans in the context of freedom of expression in prisons

    EVİN NAZ ERCAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2020

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ÖZEN ÜLGEN ADADAĞ

  5. Türkiye'de su hakkı

    The right to water in Turkey

    YILDIZ AKEL ÜNAL

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ERDOĞAN BÜLBÜL