A harmonised contract law for cross-border transactions across the European Union
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 771880
- Danışmanlar: Belirtilmemiş.
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Hukuk, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Law, International Relations
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2016
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Saxion Hogescholen
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 167
Özet
In October 2011, the European Commission published a proposed Common European Sales law (CESL) with the intention to create a harmonised set of contractual provisions to improve the trade in the internal market. The idea for this proposal came from the results of the Gallup organisation that has done research on behalf of the European Commission relating to the issues of agreeing, interpreting, and applying contracts in cross-border transactions which can affect the smooth functioning of the internal market. This research has revealed that businesses are experience four major difficulties in the provisions in foreign contract law, obtaining legal advice in foreign law, and difficulties in costs and litigations in cross-border transactions. The European Commission has therefore created the proposal to counter the difficulties by providing a harmonised set of contractual provisions so that businesses will be stimulated to take part in cross-border transactions more often. This paper has therefore focussed on the question of whether the proposal is effective enough to counter those four major difficulties. This is done according to the assessment framework that has been created. Thus, if the proposed CESL can truly counter those difficulties and encourage businesses to take part in cross-border transactions, the proposal can be considered effective. By comparing similar contractual provisions from Dutch civil law and UK common law with the proposal and determining whether the proposal has improved on the failures of previous attempts, it was concluded that the proposed CESL is not adequately effective. The reason for this conclusion was the lack of the provisions for the litigation procedure and because the parties are forced to approach a domestic as well a foreign lawyer to understand the contractual provisions of foreign law (or the CISG and Rome 1+2) to fill the gaps that were missing in the proposal. To avoid a unilateral conclusion, there was also a focus on the comments of the UK, the Netherlands, Germany, and their law commissions and scholars about the proposal. Based on their views, it is also concluded that the proposed CESL is not effective enough to be used in practice for the stimulation of more cross-border transactions.
Özet (Çeviri)
Özet çevirisi mevcut değil.
Benzer Tezler
- Feshin geçersizliği ve işçilik alacakları
Invalidity of termination and labour claims
EMİNE ESRA UYSAL İBAT
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2018
HukukAkdeniz ÜniversitesiÖzel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ FARUK BARIŞ MUTLAY
- Uluslararası banka garanti sözleşmeleri ve bankanın savunma araçları
International bank guarantees and bank's defences
FİRUZE DİLEM BULGAN
- Avrupa Birliği Kamu İhalesi Hukukunun genel ilkeleri
General principles of European Union Public Procurement Law
SERVET ALYANAK
Doktora
Türkçe
2009
HukukAnkara ÜniversitesiAvrupa Birliği ve Uluslararası Ekonomik İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. MAHMUT TUĞRUL ARAT