Geri Dön

The conceptual analysis of 'Culpa in contrahendo': A critical study in European private international law

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 839096
  2. Yazar: ANIL ÖZTÜRK
  3. Danışmanlar: Belirtilmemiş.
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Hukuk, Uluslararası Ticaret, Law, International Trade
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2017
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Trinity College Dublin
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 89

Özet

This study critically depicts the position on culpa in contrahendo in the European Private International Law. This critical description is based on the conceptual analysis of culpa in contrahendo. In this context, first, the conceptual elements and the legal character of culpa in contrahendo have been determined in consideration of the differences between the national legal systems and more broadly between the two main legal traditions (Common law and Civil law traditions), and hence, the rules on the determination of the competent court and applicable law in the European Private International Law has been analysed in this respect. To briefly summarize the study, first, the elements of culpa in contrahendo liability are the presence of the contract negotiations, breach of the pre-contractual duty of good faith, fault, damages, and causation-at-fact. The recognition and legal situation of the precontractual duty of good faith seems to be the main point of divergence between different legal systems. That is, in Common law systems the said duty is not recognized and therefore its breach is not sanctioned, whereas in most Civil law systems the duty is sanctioned. Nonetheless, it has also been ascertained that, the breach of the pre-contractual duty of good faith is being compensated under the institutions of promissory estoppel and misrepresentation in the Common law legal systems, albeit these institutions have more specific elements than those for the liability for culpa in contrahendo. Following the determination of the fact that the liability for culpa in contrahendo exists in most legal systems with varying scopes and names, it has been found that its legal characterization is different in every national legal system, and there are different theories in this respect. The most plausible of these theories is the one that defines the culpa in contrahendo as a fiduciary liability arising from a breach of a special proximity between the parties, and purports the application of contractual liability provisions in the absence of provisions specific to that responsibility. However, it has also been shown that different legal systems prefer to define culpa in contrahendo as a contractual or tort liability (France), or by adopting the case-by-case characterization (Portugal, UK, Ireland). Evaluating the European Private International Law rules under the light of this analysis, it has been found that, in its step-bystep development, the European Private International Law has, first, accordingly categorized the culpa in contrahendo as a non-contractual liability, but determined the applicable law as the law applicable to the contract that has been negotiated. It is important to note that the European Private International Law does not acknowledge or reject the pre-contractual duty of good faith, regarding the differences between Common law and Civil law systems.

Özet (Çeviri)

Özet çevirisi mevcut değil.

Benzer Tezler

  1. The Conceptual Analysis of 'Culpa on Contrahendo': A Critical Study In European Private International Law

    'Culpa on Contrahendo'nun kavramsal analizi: Avrupa uluslararası özel hukuku üzerine eleştirel bir çalışma

    ANIL ÖZTÜRK

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2017

    HukukTrinity College Dublin

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    ÖĞR. GÖR. NAZLI HEİMANN

  2. Yoksulluk ve belirsizlik: Yoksulluğun yönetimi ve sosyal sorunun kuruluşu

    Poverty and uncertainty: Government of poverty and constitution of social question

    ZAFER YILMAZ

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2011

    Siyasal BilimlerAnkara Üniversitesi

    Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü

    DOÇ. DR. FİLİZ ÇULHA ZABCI

  3. Antonio Buero Vallejo'nun oyunlarında simgesel ögeler

    Symbolic elements in Antonio Boero Vallejo's plays elementos simbolicos en las obras de Antonio Buero Vallejo

    AYFER TEKER

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1997

    Batı Dilleri ve EdebiyatıAnkara Üniversitesi

    Batı Dilleri ve Edebiyatları Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. YILDIZ CANPOLAT

  4. Populism, identity and leadership in supporting pro-refugee policies: Social identity approach

    Mülteci yanlısı politikaları desteklemede popülizm, kimlik ve liderlik: Sosyal kimlik yaklaşımı

    METE SEFA UYSAL

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2021

    PsikolojiDokuz Eylül Üniversitesi

    Psikoloji Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. DUYGU GÜNGÖR CULHA

  5. Siyasal toplumsallaşma, siyasal kültür ve siyasal katılım arasındaki ilişkinin kavramsal analizi

    The conceptual analysis of the relations among the political socialization political culture and political participation

    ESRA AKAY

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2006

    Siyasal BilimlerDumlupınar Üniversitesi

    Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF.DR. SAMİ DENKER