Tek tanrılı dinler karşısında kadın. (Hristiyanlık`ta ve İslamiyet`te kadının statüsüne karşılaştırmalı bir yaklaşım)
Women versus monotheistic religions. (A comparative study of women`s status in christianity and İslam)
- Tez No: 36289
- Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. MEHMET ALİ AĞAOĞULLARI
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Din, Kamu Yönetimi, Sosyoloji, Religion, Public Administration, Sociology
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, Hristiyanlık, Kadın statüsü, Kadınlar, İlahi dinler, İran, İslamiyet, United States of America, Christianity, Women status, Women, Divine religions, Iran, Islam
- Yıl: 1994
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
SUMMARY WOMEN VERSUS MONOTHEISTIC RELIGIONS (A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WOMEN'S STATUS IN CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM) Studying the relationship between women and religion poses manifold problems. There is, first, the question of religion in theory and religion in practice, the way it is actually experienced by people in various contexts and in different historical periods. Secondly, it is difficult to speak about women as if they constitute a unified entity, when in actual fact they lead a fragmented existence subject to divisions of class, race, nationality, ethnicity. Then again, while women have lived, and continue to live, in male-dominated societies, within or alongside the dominant patriarchal culture there has always been the possibility of the formation and maintenance of a certain distinctively female culture, for women have been both victims and active agents of history. Structures of domination, therefore, are also loci of resistance - a fact which consigns any simplistic and reductionist interpretation of socio-historical phenomena - including religion- to irrelevance. Things become all the more complicated when it comes to trying to understand women's subjectivity, the ways in which they conceive of themselves and of the world around them. This is indispensable if we are to be able to comprehend religion and the way it relates to women, particularly since religion is, perhaps more than anything else, a meaning system. But on the other hand, there are also the objective functions and aspects of religion to consider: the means it provides for legitimization and reification; its contribution to engendering and reinforcing rigid gender differences; the way in which women's subordination has been underwritten by the holy texts of the major monotheistic religions. 229certain themes initially introduced in the Introduction, but this time in a more overtly“subjective”manner, including explicit statements on how I feel about religion. Thus I argue that women should go beyond the restrictive boundaries of religion and reclaim both the right to eat of the forbidden fruit of the tree of knowledge, and also to claim the right to name, to produce“the definitions by which things are known”, and first and foremost with regard to themselves.“What's in a name?”one might ask -but the possessors of the right to name, to define, are also the possessors of power. The struggle for“self-determination”for women inevitably involves undermining imposed definitions and creating alternative ones. Thus I end with Hilde Hein's words: The very notion of religion, though not devoid of features that may be gratifying to women as well as to men, must be so contaminated with patriarchal structures and residual associations of polarized values, hierarchy, and transcendence that even the most scrupulous feminist expurgation oould not disinfect it. ^ounterweapons will not serve where disarmament must be our end. 234SUMMARY WOMEN VERSUS MONOTHEISTIC RELIGIONS (A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WOMEN'S STATUS IN CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM) Studying the relationship between women and religion poses manifold problems. There is, first, the question of religion in theory and religion in practice, the way it is actually experienced by people in various contexts and in different historical periods. Secondly, it is difficult to speak about women as if they constitute a unified entity, when in actual fact they lead a fragmented existence subject to divisions of class, race, nationality, ethnicity. Then again, while women have lived, and continue to live, in male-dominated societies, within or alongside the dominant patriarchal culture there has always been the possibility of the formation and maintenance of a certain distinctively female culture, for women have been both victims and active agents of history. Structures of domination, therefore, are also loci of resistance - a fact which consigns any simplistic and reductionist interpretation of socio-historical phenomena - including religion- to irrelevance. Things become all the more complicated when it comes to trying to understand women's subjectivity, the ways in which they conceive of themselves and of the world around them. This is indispensable if we are to be able to comprehend religion and the way it relates to women, particularly since religion is, perhaps more than anything else, a meaning system. But on the other hand, there are also the objective functions and aspects of religion to consider: the means it provides for legitimization and reification; its contribution to engendering and reinforcing rigid gender differences; the way in which women's subordination has been underwritten by the holy texts of the major monotheistic religions. 229certain themes initially introduced in the Introduction, but this time in a more overtly“subjective”manner, including explicit statements on how I feel about religion. Thus I argue that women should go beyond the restrictive boundaries of religion and reclaim both the right to eat of the forbidden fruit of the tree of knowledge, and also to claim the right to name, to produce“the definitions by which things are known”, and first and foremost with regard to themselves.“What's in a name?”one might ask -but the possessors of the right to name, to define, are also the possessors of power. The struggle for“self-determination”for women inevitably involves undermining imposed definitions and creating alternative ones. Thus I end with Hilde Hein's words: The very notion of religion, though not devoid of features that may be gratifying to women as well as to men, must be so contaminated with patriarchal structures and residual associations of polarized values, hierarchy, and transcendence that even the most scrupulous feminist expurgation oould not disinfect it. ^ounterweapons will not serve where disarmament must be our end. 234SUMMARY WOMEN VERSUS MONOTHEISTIC RELIGIONS (A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WOMEN'S STATUS IN CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM) Studying the relationship between women and religion poses manifold problems. There is, first, the question of religion in theory and religion in practice, the way it is actually experienced by people in various contexts and in different historical periods. Secondly, it is difficult to speak about women as if they constitute a unified entity, when in actual fact they lead a fragmented existence subject to divisions of class, race, nationality, ethnicity. Then again, while women have lived, and continue to live, in male-dominated societies, within or alongside the dominant patriarchal culture there has always been the possibility of the formation and maintenance of a certain distinctively female culture, for women have been both victims and active agents of history. Structures of domination, therefore, are also loci of resistance - a fact which consigns any simplistic and reductionist interpretation of socio-historical phenomena - including religion- to irrelevance. Things become all the more complicated when it comes to trying to understand women's subjectivity, the ways in which they conceive of themselves and of the world around them. This is indispensable if we are to be able to comprehend religion and the way it relates to women, particularly since religion is, perhaps more than anything else, a meaning system. But on the other hand, there are also the objective functions and aspects of religion to consider: the means it provides for legitimization and reification; its contribution to engendering and reinforcing rigid gender differences; the way in which women's subordination has been underwritten by the holy texts of the major monotheistic religions. 229certain themes initially introduced in the Introduction, but this time in a more overtly“subjective”manner, including explicit statements on how I feel about religion. Thus I argue that women should go beyond the restrictive boundaries of religion and reclaim both the right to eat of the forbidden fruit of the tree of knowledge, and also to claim the right to name, to produce“the definitions by which things are known”, and first and foremost with regard to themselves.“What's in a name?”one might ask -but the possessors of the right to name, to define, are also the possessors of power. The struggle for“self-determination”for women inevitably involves undermining imposed definitions and creating alternative ones. Thus I end with Hilde Hein's words: The very notion of religion, though not devoid of features that may be gratifying to women as well as to men, must be so contaminated with patriarchal structures and residual associations of polarized values, hierarchy, and transcendence that even the most scrupulous feminist expurgation oould not disinfect it. ^ounterweapons will not serve where disarmament must be our end. 234
Benzer Tezler
- Erken Hristiyan ve ilk Bizans resim ve kabartma sanatında kaynak ve okullar (2 cilt)
Sources and school of painting and sculpture during the early Christian and first Byzantine period
AHMET MEHMET KİPMEN
- Soğuk Deri ve Romancının Romanı'nda ötekileştirilen bedenler olarak kadınlar ve hayvanlar
Women and animals as“Other”ed bodies in Cold Skin and Elizabeth Costello
MELİKE GÜL MÜRDÜK
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2025
FelsefeDokuz Eylül ÜniversitesiKadın Çalışmaları Ana Bilim Dalı (disiplinlerarası)
PROF. DR. NİLSEN GÖKÇEN ULUK
- İntihar olgusunun antropolojik bağlamda analizi
The analysi̇s of sui̇ci̇de i̇n an anthrologi̇cal context
CİHAN ÇELİK
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2019
AntropolojiVan Yüzüncü Yıl ÜniversitesiAntropoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ HANDAN TUNÇ
- Bir güncel sanat pratiği olarak baba ve otorite
As a contemporary art practice father and authority
RABİA DEMİR
Sanatta Yeterlik
Türkçe
2019
Güzel SanatlarGazi ÜniversitesiResim Ana Sanat Dalı
PROF. DR. TANSEL TÜRKDOĞAN
- Feste und feiertage im Türkischen und Deutschen
Türklerde ve Almanlarda bayramlar ve tatil günleri
KÜRŞAD MURAD ÖZHAN
Yüksek Lisans
Almanca
2002
Halk Bilimi (Folklor)Hacettepe ÜniversitesiAlman Dili ve Edebiyatı Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ.DR. ŞERİFE YILDIZ