Geri Dön

Mimarlığın teknolojik evrimi

Technological evolution of architecture

PDF İndir

  1. Tez No: 512314
  2. Yazar: ERDEM DOKUZER
  3. Danışmanlar: DOÇ. DR. PELİN DURSUN ÇEBİ
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Mimarlık, Architecture
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2018
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Mimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Mimari Tasarım Bilim Dalı
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 150

Özet

Bu çalışma, mimarlığın teknoloji tarihi üzerine yapılan evrimsel bir analojidir. Araştırmaya kaynaklık eden veriler, eskizlerden, yayınlanmış tezlerden, eleştirisel makalelerden ve her dönemin ayakta kalan mimari yapılarından elde edilmiştir. Yapılan literatür taramalarında, maddi kültürün çeşitliliğini açıklayan ve bu çalışmanın kuramsal alt yapısına zemin sağlayan evrimsel analojilerin izi sürülmüştür. Önceki çalışmalardan ödünç alınan bilgiler ışığında, mimarlık ve biyoloji arasında, neden-sonuç ilişkisine dayalı, değişen çevreye uyum sağlama süreçlerinin ve ilişkilerinin ele alındığı evrimsel bir analoji önerilmiştir. Biyolojik çeşitliliği açıklayan evrim kuramları, zaman içerisinde rastlantısal ve nedensel ilişkilerin gözlenebildiği bir perspektif sunar, mimarlığın işlevsel gereksinimlerini barındıran teknolojik tarihi ise, neden-sonuç ilişkisine dayalı bu sürecin gözlemleneceği uygun bir zemin oluşturmaktadır. Dolayısıyla çalışma kapsamında mimarlığın teknolojik boyutu ele alınmış ve teknolojik yeniliğin en yoğun yaşandığı sanayi devri sonrası döneme odaklanılmıştır. Literatür taramalarında, mimari kültürün gelişimini-ilerleyişini anlatmak için yapılan“evrim geçirme”tanımının çoğu kez bilimsel bağlamından uzak, yüzeysel bir şekilde kullanıldığı fark edilmiştir. Bu nedenle“değişim”ve“evrim”kavramlarının mimarlık alanındaki kullanımlarına gelinceye kadar yaşadığı kuramsal gelişim, ikinci bölümde detaylı bir şekilde irdelenmiştir. Özellikle 19.yüzyıldan sonra, kültürel alanlarda yaygınlaşmaya başlayan evrimsel analojilerin ortaya koyduğu determinist yaklaşımlar, farklı sistemlerdeki karmaşık ilişkileri ortaya çıkarmak için bir yöntem olarak kullanılmıştır. Mimarlığın teknolojik ilerleyişini evrimsel bir analoji temelinde kurabilmek için, çalışmanın üçüncü bölümünde bu evrimci yaklaşımların arka planına inilmiş, teknoloji ve mimarlığın gelişimini farklı açılardan ele alan ve dönemi içinde özgün kabul edilen örneklerin karşılaştırmalı analizleri yapılmıştır. Dördüncü bölümde, analizlerden elde edilen veriler sentezlenerek, evrimsel analojinin bilimsel çerçevesi dört temel evrim ilkesi üzerine kurulmuştur:“gereksinim”,“adaptasyon”,“seçilim”ve“çeşitlik”. Bu dört temel evrimsel filtre ile mimarlığın teknolojik gelişimi;“strüktür-malzeme”,“yapım-araç teknolojisi”ve“teknolojik-bilimsel yenilikler”başlıkları altında irdelenmiştir. Teknolojik değişimin en yoğun hissedildiği sanayi devrimi ağırlıklı olmak üzere, her biri kendi dönemi içinde önemli teknolojik yenilik getiren farklı mimari örnekler, çevresel ve sosyolojik dinamiklerle değerlendirerek neden-sonuç ilişkisi altında ele alınmış, karşılaştırmalı bir tablo ile değişim izlenebildiği evrimsel bir şema (haritalama) oluşturulmuştur. Sonuç bölümünde, mimarlığın teknolojik evrimi bu evrimsel şema üzerinden değerlendirilerek geleceğin mimarlığını hakkında bir öngörüde bulunulmuştur.

Özet (Çeviri)

This work is an evolutionary analogy about the history of architecture. The sources of research are derived from sketches, published theses, critical articles, and architectural structures that survive from each period. Evidence of evolutionary analogies explaining the diversity of material cultures and providing the background to the theoretical sub-structure of this work has been traced in the literature reviews. In the light of information borrowed from previous works, an evolutionary analogy has been proposed, addressing the processes of adaptation to the changing environment and its relations, based on the cause-effect relationship between architecture and biology. The most visible part of the change in architecture is“technology”. Technological advancement has enabled the development of engineering knowledge and construction techniques, in this way; building forms, composition rules, materials, methods of use of structures, composition of typical elements, details, decoration, etc. many architectural elements have undergone changes. Successful results that meet sociological and physical needs have been developed and passed on to the future, while those that fail have been eliminated or destroyed over time. From primitive shelters that provide the need for housing to this end, everything that has been tried, produced and developed until the modern skyscrapers of the 21st century has been added to the enormous diversity of architectural cultures. This major change in architecture and the resulting diversity have complex interrelationships of environmental and social dynamics.“Evolutionary approaches”that describe change around a causal mechanism have the potential to explain this change in architectural culture. The way in which evolutionary approaches in cultural fields have evolved from the origins of biology to the day-to-day behavior of all adaptive systems have been one of our most powerful tools in seeking the laws underlying change processes. The explanatory and comparative approach of evolutionary theory has been an inspiration to elucidate the complex relationships of systems in different fields. The“natural selection”mechanism, which Darwin pointed out, is an often used method in evolutionary analogies for systems outside of biology, which indicates that an organic structure that adapts to its environment will have more chances to survive. But the lack of a general theory of change, which explains the development of architecture in a comparative and systematic way, has often led architects and historians to skip the“cause-and-effect”relationship when revealing detailed chronologies of events and structures. Given the complex interplay between social, cultural, geographical, technological, economic and innumerable individual intentions that affect architectural culture in any given period, presenting a chronological list of changes that architecture has experienced does not provide a sufficient explanation. Steadman underlined this in the preface to the book“The Evolution of Design”, and mentioned that a more comprehensive study of architectural culture change is needed. At the same time, mistakes are often made in the use of concepts such as change and evolution. These misuse are often seen in the use of the term“evolving”to describe the development and progress of architectural cultures. These definitions of evolution away from the scientific context can bring with it a conceptual confusion in revealing the possible evolution of architecture. When we look at evolutionary studies in the field of architecture in the literature, in the early 20th century, architects like Fletcher, Geddes and Jencks have been used to analyze the historical development of architectural cultures. But nowadays, it is noteworthy that the number of historical evolutionary analogies that architects have used to analyze the historical development of architectural cultures has gradually decreased. Therefore, this study of“technological evolution of architecture”aims to fill the theoretical gap left by the recently decreasing historical evolutionary analysts and to develop an alternative, contemporary scientific method for explaining architectural cultural change through the principles of organic evolution. In the first chapter, the problem area of the study is defined and the thought which causes the study to be done is tried to be conveyed to the reader in a short and concise manner. The aim, method and scope of the work are expressed in this section. In the second part, the concepts of“change”and“evolution”which constitute the conceptual background of the study are dealt with in detail so that the analogical approach to the technological evolution of architecture can be read correctly. In the literature reviews made, it was noticed that the definition of“evolving”to describe the development of architectural cultures-progression-was often used superficially away from the scientific context. For this reason, the theoretical development that has lived up to the use of the concepts of“change”and“evolution”in the field of architecture has been mentioned in detail. Also in this section, the development of concepts of change and evolution has been conveyed in chronological order until the emergence of theories of“cultural”and“organic”evolution, in order to descend into the background of the idea of evolution and present the scientific context of the reader. In the literature survey, it was observed that ideas about the change or evolution of architecture began to spread after the 19th century. Thus, in the second chapter, the thoughts on the evolution of architectural cul- tures have been examined at the end of the 19th century and earlier, along with the progressive cultural evolution ideas. The theoretical background of the evolutionary analogies that constitute the subject of the third chapter has been revealed. In the third chapter, the evolutionary analogies that began to become widespread in the cultural sphere after the 19th century were inspired to build the technological progress of architecture on the basis of an evolutionary analogy. The architectural evolution analogies and the technological evolutionary analogies made in cultural areas were evaluated together, and some architectural works that considered the development of technology and architecture from different angles unique within the period were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, the principles of organic evolution, which will form the original aspect and theoretical framework of the evolutionary analogue proposed in the fourth chapter, have been determined. In the fourth chapter, analogical methods, which are valuable in the light of the data obtained from the analyzes, have been synthesized and four basic organic evolutionary principles have been defined for the scientific framework of the evolutionary analogue:“requirement”,“adaptation”,“selection”and“diversity”. The technological development of architecture with these four basic evolutionary filters;“structure-material”,“construction-vehicle technology”and“technological-scientific innovations”have examined. Unique architectural structures, each with significant technological innovation in their period, have been selected, predominantly in the Industrial Revolution, where technological change is felt most intensely. The selected works were evaluated under environmental and sociological dynamics within the periods and an evolutionary reading (mapping) was conducted under the cause-effect relationship, in which a comparative table could be followed. In the conclusion section, this evolutionary reading was evaluated, historical sections were taken from different points, and a simple formula-grammar was tried to be compared by the change, environmental and cultural dynamics of architecture. To try to establish such an analogy approach will bring different perspectives and possibly new starting points to architecture point of view.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Tez No

    792386

    Creative evolution in architecture: A critical inquiry into new relations of objectile, subjectile and intelligent spaces

    Mimarlıkta yaratıcı evrim: Teknolojik nesne [objectıle]-öznel arayüz [subjectıle] ve akıllı mekanların yeni ilişkileri üzerine eleştirel bir araştırma

    SERDAR ERİŞEN

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2021

    MimarlıkOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    Mimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. GÜVEN ARİF SARGIN

  2. Tez No

    405079

    The Pakistani courtyard house: A comparative study of spatial configurations using syntactical analysis

    Pakistan'ın avlulu evleri: Uzamsal konfigürasyonların sentaks analizi karşılaştırması

    NAVEEN IFTIKHAR ALI

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2015

    Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Mimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ALPER ÜNLÜ

  3. Tez No

    685060

    Impact of technology in architectural competitions: Berlin after the reunification

    Teknolojinin mimari yarışmalar üzerinde ki etkisi: birleşme sonrası Berlin

    HİLAL ÇİNAR

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2021

    MimarlıkBahçeşehir Üniversitesi

    Mimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ BELİNDA TORUS

  4. Tez No

    252112

    Possible futures for architectural entity within the context of transdisciplinary technological developments

    Disiplinler ötesi teknolojik gelişmeler bağlamında mimari varlığın olası geleceği

    LALE BAŞARIR

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2009

    Bilim ve Teknolojiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Bilişim Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. M. TANYEL TÜRKASLAN BÜLBÜL

    PROF. DR. GÜLEN ÇAĞDAŞ

  5. Tez No

    85222

    Axiality in the process of space organisation in architecture

    Mimari mekan organizasyon sürecinde akslar ve aksların kullanımı

    ÖZGÜR DİNÇER

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    1999

    Mimarlıkİzmir Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü

    Mimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. AHMET EYÜCE

Geri Dön