Geri Dön

Decision and plurality: The specificity of the political in Carl Schmitt and Hannah Arendt

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 401934
  2. Yazar: ÖZGÜR EMRAH GÜREL
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. ALAN HUNT, PROF. ALICE ORMISTON
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Kamu Yönetimi, Siyasal Bilimler, Public Administration, Political Science
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2003
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Carleton University
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 152

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

This thesis tries to analyze the critics of liberal understanding of political community and democracy from the point of Cari Schmitt and Hannah Arendt. Even though they were both criticizing the liberal philosophy for destroying the specificity of politics in the society, Schmitt's analysis suggests a total conceptualization of politics by concentrating on only a strong state (a strong-sovereigri). There is no place for civic participation and dialogue in Schmitt's political philosophy. For Schmitt, homogeneity is the condition for the possibility of democracy. Moreover, he explicitly indicates that the state, as an ethical, univocal, transcendent and comprehensive unit, has the right to demand from its members the readiness to die. However Arendt's endeavor is to formulate the“Socratic”formation of modern citizenship and different ways of participation and dialogue for the re-construction of public sphere (a strong-constitution). Her conception of politics is in fact based on the idea of active citizenship, that is, on the value and importance of civic engagement and collective deliberation about ali matters affecting the political community. I think, by examining Arendt's suggestions and critics, it is not utopian to indicate that there are stili possibilities for the civic virtue, political equality and particularly the new dimensions of active citizenship in the formation of post-politics for our societies. My thesis tries to acknowledge that Arendt's aim could be a better way to comprehend the democratic implications of the specificity of the political against the arguments of the Schmittian-conservative analysis that tries to fmd a common substance for the ontology of politics. This thesis is also trying to claim that the very reality of the public realm emerges only through the robust communication of opinions emanating from a multitude of diverse perspectives. In this way, I hope to indicate that Arendt's conception remains important for contemporary attempts to revive the idea and the practice of democratic citizenship.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Essays on the effect of emotions on the political decision and judgment

    Duyguların siyasal karar ve yargılara etkileri üzerine makaleler

    FARUK AKSOY

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2021

    Siyasal BilimlerSabancı Üniversitesi

    Siyaset Bilimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ÖZGE KEMAHLIOĞLU BAYER

  2. An Unvarranted promise of democracy: deregulation in broadcasting

    Yerine getirilmemiş bir demokrasi sözü: yayıncılıkta kuralların ortadan kaldırılması

    GÜLİN DİNÇ

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    1993

    Kamu YönetimiOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. KAYA RAŞİT

  3. İran şirketler hukukunda anonim şirketlerin yeri ve organizasyonu

    The status and organization of the joint-stock companies in the Iran's ompany law

    SAFARALİ KHOEINI

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    HukukGazi Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. KÜRŞAT GÖKTÜRK

  4. La problématique de la volonté chez Leibniz

    Leibniz'de irade sorunsalı

    RİZA HAKAN KILIÇCIOĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    Fransızca

    Fransızca

    2020

    FelsefeGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ALİYE KOVANLIKAYA

  5. Le Concept de décision chez Nietzsche

    Nietzsche'de karar kavramı

    İBRAHİM EYLEM DOĞAN

    Doktora

    Fransızca

    Fransızca

    2017

    FelsefeGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. MEHMET TÜRKER ARMANER