Decision and plurality: The specificity of the political in Carl Schmitt and Hannah Arendt
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 401934
- Danışmanlar: PROF. ALAN HUNT, PROF. ALICE ORMISTON
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Kamu Yönetimi, Siyasal Bilimler, Public Administration, Political Science
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2003
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Carleton University
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 152
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
This thesis tries to analyze the critics of liberal understanding of political community and democracy from the point of Cari Schmitt and Hannah Arendt. Even though they were both criticizing the liberal philosophy for destroying the specificity of politics in the society, Schmitt's analysis suggests a total conceptualization of politics by concentrating on only a strong state (a strong-sovereigri). There is no place for civic participation and dialogue in Schmitt's political philosophy. For Schmitt, homogeneity is the condition for the possibility of democracy. Moreover, he explicitly indicates that the state, as an ethical, univocal, transcendent and comprehensive unit, has the right to demand from its members the readiness to die. However Arendt's endeavor is to formulate the“Socratic”formation of modern citizenship and different ways of participation and dialogue for the re-construction of public sphere (a strong-constitution). Her conception of politics is in fact based on the idea of active citizenship, that is, on the value and importance of civic engagement and collective deliberation about ali matters affecting the political community. I think, by examining Arendt's suggestions and critics, it is not utopian to indicate that there are stili possibilities for the civic virtue, political equality and particularly the new dimensions of active citizenship in the formation of post-politics for our societies. My thesis tries to acknowledge that Arendt's aim could be a better way to comprehend the democratic implications of the specificity of the political against the arguments of the Schmittian-conservative analysis that tries to fmd a common substance for the ontology of politics. This thesis is also trying to claim that the very reality of the public realm emerges only through the robust communication of opinions emanating from a multitude of diverse perspectives. In this way, I hope to indicate that Arendt's conception remains important for contemporary attempts to revive the idea and the practice of democratic citizenship.
Benzer Tezler
- Essays on the effect of emotions on the political decision and judgment
Duyguların siyasal karar ve yargılara etkileri üzerine makaleler
FARUK AKSOY
Doktora
İngilizce
2021
Siyasal BilimlerSabancı ÜniversitesiSiyaset Bilimi Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. ÖZGE KEMAHLIOĞLU BAYER
- An Unvarranted promise of democracy: deregulation in broadcasting
Yerine getirilmemiş bir demokrasi sözü: yayıncılıkta kuralların ortadan kaldırılması
GÜLİN DİNÇ
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
1993
Kamu YönetimiOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiKamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. KAYA RAŞİT
- İran şirketler hukukunda anonim şirketlerin yeri ve organizasyonu
The status and organization of the joint-stock companies in the Iran's ompany law
SAFARALİ KHOEINI
- La problématique de la volonté chez Leibniz
Leibniz'de irade sorunsalı
RİZA HAKAN KILIÇCIOĞLU
Yüksek Lisans
Fransızca
2020
FelsefeGalatasaray ÜniversitesiFelsefe Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. ALİYE KOVANLIKAYA
- Le Concept de décision chez Nietzsche
Nietzsche'de karar kavramı
İBRAHİM EYLEM DOĞAN
Doktora
Fransızca
2017
FelsefeGalatasaray ÜniversitesiFelsefe Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. MEHMET TÜRKER ARMANER
