The role of the regulatory bodies in the privatisation process
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 517055
- Danışmanlar: Dr. PAUL COOK
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Kamu Yönetimi, Public Administration
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 1989
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: The University of Manchester
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 60
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
Privatisation has become a favourable policy in recent years throughout the world. Developiııg countries as well as developed countries have adopted privatisation policies as a remedy for their problematic public enterprise sectors. However, privatising public enterprises does not on its own provide expected results from the policies, it is not a clear cut solution. There is stili room to regulate privatised enterprises in accordance with public interests and market conditions. While the economic dimension of regulation is concerned with the imposition of controls on entry, exit, prices, outputs, services supplied, markets served, consolidations and profitability in particular industries, the social face of regulation includes protection of consumers from potentially adverse effects of competition. There are two types of regulatory control; rate-of-return regulation which is employed in the U.S. and a price control formula which is adopted in the U.K. Both systems have advantages and disadvantages, however their foundations are much the same. An İmportant point which must be mentioned while setting up a regulatory raechanism is information flow. As long as a regulatory body is well informed about the conditions of an industry it will be able to operate properly. The regulatory system in the U.K. has a distinctive character since specialised regulatory bodies have been established for privatised industries. The authority of regulation is in the hands of the Secretary of State for Trade and industry, the Monopolies and Mergers üommission (MMC) and the chief executives of specialised bodies: the Office of Telecoramunications (üftel) provides a good example of a specialised regulatory body in the U.K. Turkey is one of the developing countries which has adopted privatisation policies since the early 1980s. However, the regulatory aspect of privatisation seems to be neglected. Despite the fact that privatisation itself is quite a new phenomenon for Turkey, it cannot be a sufficient reason not to establish a regulatory framework since the success of privatisation depends very much upon complementary regulatory policies. This study proposes a regulatory model for Turkey.
Benzer Tezler
- Türkiye'de özelleştirme ve telekominikasyon sektörü
In Turkey privatization and sector of telecominication
MUHİDDİN ŞAHİN
- Türkiye'de kalkınma - sermaye birikimine enerji ihtiyacı üzerinden bakmak
Development - capital accumulation in Turkey from the point of view of energy need
MEHMET YUSUFOĞLU
- Radyo ve televizyon alanının düzenlenmesi ve denetlenmesinde yeni eğilimler ve yönelimler (ABD, Batı Avrupa ve Türkiye örnekleri üzerine karşılaştırmalı çalışma)
New tendencies and orientations in regulating and supervising of radio and television areas (a comparative study on USA, West Europe and Turkey samples)
HÜLYA ÖZTEKİN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2007
Radyo-TelevizyonErciyes ÜniversitesiRadyo Televizyon ve Sinema Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ.DR. METİN IŞIK
- The role of analytical procedures in revealing creative accounting practices: An empirical study in audit companies in Istanbul
Yaratıcı muhasebe uygulamalarının ortaya çıkarılmasında analitik prosedürlerin rolü: İstanbul'daki denetim şirketlerinde ampirik bir çalışma
HAYA S. A. ABOKWAIK
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2024
İşletmeAnadolu Üniversitesiİşletme Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ARMAN AZİZ KARAGÜL
- 2008 yılı ekonomik krizi sonrasında Türk bankacılık sektörünün veri zarflama analizi ile etkinliğinin incelenmesi
After the economic crisis of 2008, the Turkish banking sector with data envelopment analysis, efficiency analysis
HÜLYA YAĞCI